Evidence-based interventions and screening recommendations for colorectal cancer in comprehensive cancer control plans: A content analysis

Preventing Chronic Disease

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Townsend, Julie S ^a   Richardson, Lisa C ^b   Steele, C Brooke ^b   White, Dana E ^b  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^b CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLORECTAL TUMOR; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; MASS SCREENING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE;

COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 73349106848     PISSN: 15451151     EISSN: 21665435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. United States cancer statistics: 2004 incidence and mortality. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute, US Cancer Statistics Working Group; 2007. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/uscs/. Accessed July 25, 2008.
2. Espey DK, Wu XC, Swan J, Wiggins C, Jim MA, Ward E, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2004, featuring cancer in American Indians and Alaska Natives. Cancer 2007;110(10):2119-52.
3. Perdue DG, Perkins C, Jackson-Thompson J, Coughlin SS, Ahmed F, Haverkamp DS, et al. Regional differences in colorectal cancer incidence, stage, and subsite among American Indians and Alaska Natives, 1999-2004. Cancer 2008;113(5):1179-90.
4. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993;329(27):1977-81.
5. Screening for colorectal cancer, topic page. Rockville (MD): US Preventive Services Task Force, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; July 2002. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspscolo.htm. Accessed July 28, 2008.
6. Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Schrag D, Boer R, Winawer SJ, Habbema JD, et al. How much can current interventions reduce colorectal cancer mortality in the US? Mortality projections for scenarios of risk-factor modification, screening, and treatment. Cancer 2006;107(7):1624-33.
7. Shapiro JA, Seeff LC, Thompson TD, Nadel MR, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Colorectal cancer test use from the 2005 national health interview survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(7):1623-30.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of colorectal cancer tests - United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008;57(10):253-8.
9. Abed J, Reilley B, Butler MO, Kean T, Wong F, Hohman K. Comprehensive cancer control initiative of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: an example of participatory innovation diffusion. J Public Health Manag Pract 2000;6(2):79-92.
10. Given LS, Black B, Lowry G, Huang P, Kerner JF. Collaborating to conquer cancer: a comprehensive approach to cancer control. Cancer Causes Control 2005;16 Suppl 1:3-14.
11. Kohatsu ND, Robinson JG, Torner JC. Evidence-based public health: an evolving concept. Am J Prev Med 2004;27(5):417-21.
12. Jenicek M. Epidemiology, evidenced-based medicine, and evidence-based public health. J Epidemiol 1997;7(4):187-97.
13. Brownson RC, Gurney JG, Land GH. Evidence-based decision making in public health. J Public Health Manag Pract 1999;5(5):86-97.
14. Institute of Medicine's Committee on Assuring the Health of the Public in the 21st Century; Board on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. The future of the public's health in the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2003.
15. National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences. Using what works: adapting evidence-based programs to fit your needs [CD-ROM]. Rockville (MD): National Cancer Institute; April 1, 2006.
16. Comprehensive cancer control plans: a content review. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control; December 2005.
17. Illinois Comprehensive Cancer Control State Plan 2005 -2010 [Internet]. Springfield (IL): Illinois Department of Public Health; 2005. Chapter III. Priorities to Address Comprehensive Cancer Control in Illinois; [cited 2009 May 28]; p. 26. http://cancercontrolplanet.cancer.gov/state_plans/ Illinois_Cancer_Control_Plan.pdf.
18. The Ohio Cancer Plan: 2010 [Internet]. Dublin (OH): Ohio Partners for Cancer Control; 2006. Early Detection; [cited 2009 May 28]; p. 12. http://cancercontrolplanet.cancer.gov/state_plans/ Ohio_Cancer_Control_Plan.pdf.
19. Comprehensive Cancer Control in California, 2004 [Internet]. Oakland (CA): California Dialogue on Cancer, 2004 Apr. Chapter V. Colorectal Cancer; [cited 2009 May 28]; p. 29. http://cancercontrolplanet.cancer.gov/state_plans/ California_Cancer_Control_Plan.pdf.
20. Alabama Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan 2006 -2010 [Internet]. Montgomery (AL): Alabama Department of Public Health; 2005. Early Detection: Colorectal Cancer; [cited 2009 May 28]; p. 68. http://cancercontrolplanet.cancer.gov/state_plans/ Alabama_Cancer_Control_Plan.pdf.
21. Alaska Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan 2005 -2010 [Internet]. Anchorage (AK): State of Alaska Department of Health and Social Services; 2006. Chapter II. The Burden of Cancer in Alaska; [cited 2009 May 28]; p. 13. http://cancercontrolplanet.cancer.gov/state_plans/Alaska_Cancer_Control_Plan.pdf.
22. Cherokee Nation Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan 2005 -2007 [Internet]. Tahlequah (OK): Cherokee Nation; 2005. Chapter 10, Colorectal Cancer; [cited 2009 May 28]; p. 82. http://cancercontrolplanet.cancer.gov/state_plans/Cherokee_Nation_Cancer_Control_Plan.pdf.
23. The Arizona Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan [Internet]. Phoenix (AZ): Arizona Department of Health Services. Appendix D, Arizona Comprehensive Cancer Control Coalition Special Topic: Research Organizations; [cited 2009 May 28]; p. 194. http://cancercontrolplanet.cancer.gov/state_plans/Arizona_Cancer_Control_Plan.pdf.
24. Massachusetts Statewide Plan to Reduce and Eliminate Death and Suffering Caused by Cancer 2006 -2011 [Internet]. Boston: Massachusetts Comprehensive Cancer Control Coalition; 2005. Early Detection; [cited 2009 May 28]; p. 76. http://cancercontrolplanet.cancer.gov/state_plans/Massachusetts_Cancer_Control_Plan.pdf.
25. Washington State Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan 2004 -2008 [Internet]. Olympia (WA): Washington State Department of Health; 2004. Secondary Prevention; [cited 2009 May 28]; p. 98. http://cancercontrolplanet.cancer.gov/state_plans/Washington_Cancer_Control_Plan.pdf.
26. Zaza S, Briss, PA, Harris KW, editors; Task force on Community Preventive Services. The guide to community preventive services: what works to promote health? New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
27. Research-tested intervention programs [homepage on the Internet]. Bethesda (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services; National Cancer Institute and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. http://rtips.cancer.gov/rtips/index.do. Accessed July 25, 2008.
28. Baker EA, Brennan Ramirez LK, Claus JM, Land G. Translating and disseminating research-and practice-based criteria to support evidence-based intervention planning. J Public Health Manag Pract 2008;14(2):124-30.
29. Green LW, Glasgow RE. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof 2006;29(1):126-53.
30. Coughlin SS, Costanza ME, Fernandez ME, Glanz K, Lee JW, Smith SA, et al. CDC-funded intervention research aimed at promoting colorectal cancer screening in communities. Cancer 2006;107(5 Suppl):1196-204.
31. Rabin BA, Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Kreuter MW, Weaver NL. A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. J Public Health Manag Pract 2008;14(2):117-23.
32. Dreisinger M, Leet TL, Baker EA, Gillespie KN, Haas B, Brownson RC. Improving the public health workforce: evaluation of a training course to enhance evidence-based decision making. J Public Health Manag Pract 2008;14(2):138-43.
33. Sabatino SA, Habarta N, Baron RC, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Kerner J, et al. Interventions to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers: systematic reviews of provider assessment and feedback and provider incentives. Am J Prev Med 2008;35(1 Suppl):S67-74.
34. Baron RC, Rimer BK, Breslow RA, Coates RJ, Kerner J, Melillo S, et al. Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2008 Jul;35(1 Suppl):S34-55.
35. Baron RC, Rimer BK, Coates RJ, Kerner J, Kalra GP, Melillo S, et al. Client-directed interventions to increase community access to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2008;35(1 Suppl):S56-66.
36. Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health 2007;28:413-33.
37. Wilson KM, Fridinger F; National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Work Group on Translation. Focusing on public health: a different look at translating research to practice. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008;17(2):173-9.