Interpersonal problems and personality traits: The relation between IIP-64C and NEO-FFI

Nordic Psychology

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 82-93

  Nysæter, Tor E ^a   Langvik, Eva ^a   Berthelsen, Mona ^b   Nordvik, Hilmar ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b Department of Organisational and Psychosocial Factors at work

Author keywords

IIP 64C; Interpersonal problems; NEO FFI; Personality traits; Statistical ipsation

Indexed keywords

EID: 73349106507     PISSN: 19012276     EISSN: 19040016     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1901-2276.61.3.82     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the inventory of interpersonal problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 521-536.
2. Baron, H. (1996). Strengths and limitations of Ipsative measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organization Psychology, 69, 49-56.
3. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.
4. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R: Professional manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.
5. Costa, P. T., Somerfield, M. R., & McCrae, R. R. (1996). Personality and coping: A reconceptualization. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of Coping. New York: Wiley.
6. Dunlap, W. P., & Cornwell, J. M. (1994). Factor Analysis of Ipsative Measures. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 29, 115-126.
7. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
8. Gurtman, M. B. (1995). Personality structure and interpersonal problems: A theoreticallyguided item analysis of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Assessment, 2, 343-361.
9. Gurtman, M. B. (1996). Interpersonal problems and the psychotherapy context: The construct validity of the inventory of interpersonal problems. Psychological Assessment, 8, 241-255.
10. Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureno, G., & Villasenor, V. S. (1988). Inventory of interpersonal problems: psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 885-892.
11. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). The structure of Interpersonal traits: Wiggin's Circumplex and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586-595.
12. nd edition. New York: Guilford Press.
13. Meade, A. W. (2004). Psychometric problems and issues involved with creating and using ipsative measures for selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 513-552.
14. Monsen, J. T., Hagtvet, K. A., Havik, O. E., & Eilertsen, D. E. (2006). Circumplex structure and personality disorder correlates of the interpersonal problems model (IIP-C): Construct validity and clinical implications. Psychological Assessment, 18, 165-173.
15. Murphy, K. R. & Davidshofer, C. O. (2001). Psychological Testing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
16. Nordvik, H. (2005). Personality traits: their nature and number. Journal of the Norwegian Psychological Association, 42, 994-997.
17. Soldz, S. (1997). The Interpersonal Circumplex in clinical research. In R. Plutchik & H. R. Conte (Eds.), Circumplex models of personality and emotion (pp. 411-428). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18. Soldz, S., Budman, S. H., Demby, A., & Merry, J. (1993). Representation of personality disorders in circumplex and Five-factor space: Explorations with a clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 5, 41-52.
19. Trapnell, P. D., & Wiggins, J. S. (1990). Extension of the interpersonal adjective scales to include the big five dimentions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 781-790.
20. Wright, A. G. C., Pincus, A.L., Conroy, D. E., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2009). Integrating methods to optimize circumplex description and comparison of groups. Journal of Personality Assessment, 9, 311-322.