The Interactorium: Visualising proteins, complexes and interaction networks in a virtual 3-D cell

Proteomics

Volumn 9, Issue 23, 2009, Pages 5309-5315

  Widjaja, Yose Y ^a   Pang, Chi Nam Ignatius ^a   Li, Simone S ^a   Wilkins, Marc R ^a   Lambert, Tim D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Complexome; Networks; Protein protein interactions; Systems biology; Virtual cell

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CYTOLOGY; EUKARYOTE; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROKARYOTE; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 73249150731     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200900260     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S. et al., Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13,2498-2504.
2. Hu, Z., Ng, D. M., Yamada, T., Chen, C. et al., VisANT 3.0: new modules for pathway visualization, editing, prediction and construction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35,W625-W632.
3. Ho, E., Webber, R., Wilkins, M. R., Interactive threedimensional visualization and contextual analysis of protein interaction networks. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7,104-112.
4. Ware, C., Franck, G., Evaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing information nets in three dimensions. ACM Trans. Graph. 1996, 15, 121-140.
5. Ahmed, A., Dwyer, T., Forster, M., Fu, X. et al., GEOMI: GEOmetry for maximum insight. Proceedings of 13th International Symposium on Graph Drawing, 2005, 468-479.
6. Marsh, B. J., Toward a "Visible Cell" ... and beyond. Aust. Biochem. 2006, 37, 5-10.
7. Tomita, M., Hashimoto, K., Takahashi, K., Shimizu, T. S. et al., E-CELL: software environment for whole cell simulation. Bioinformatics 1999, 15, 72-84.
8. Loew, L. M., Schaff, J. C., The Virtual Cell: a software environment for computational cell biology. Trends Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 401-406.
9. Huh, W., Falvo, J. V., Gerke, L. C., Carroll, A. S. et al., Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 2003, 425, 686-691.
10. Ghaemmaghami, S., Huh, W., Bower, K., Howson, R. W. et al., Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 2003, 425, 737-741.
11. Belle, A., Tanay, A., Bitincka, L., Shamir, R. et al., Quantification of protein half-lives in the budding yeast proteome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 13004-13009.
12. Bertin, N., Simonis, N., Dupuy, D., Cusick, M. E. et al., Confirmation of organized modularity in the yeast interactome. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5, e153.
13. Hart, G. T., Lee, I., Marcotte, E. R., A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality. Biomed Chromatogr. Bioinform. 2007, 8, 236.
14. Berman, H. M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G. et al., The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28,235-242.
15. Eades, P., A heuristic for graph drawing. Congressus Numerantium 1984, 42, 149-160.