Divergence and mixed methods

Journal of Mixed Methods Research

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 3-5

  Mertens, Donna M ^a  

^a GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73149121566     PISSN: 15586898     EISSN: 15586901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1558689809358406     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. Bergman, M. (2008). (Ed). Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2. Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3. Dellinger, M. (2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, pp. 270-283.
4. Denscombe, M. (2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, pp. 270-283.
5. Greene, J.C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, pp. 7-22.
6. Greene, J.C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7. Hesse-Biber, S. (in press). Mixed methods. NY: Guilford.
8. Johnson, B. & Christensen, J. (2008). Educational research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9. Johnson, R.B., Onweugbuzie, A.J. & Turner, L.A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, pp. 112-133.
10. Mertens, D.M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11. Mertens, D.M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. NY: Guilford Press.
12. Mertens, D.M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Jul 2007; vol. 1: pp. 212 - 225.
13. Morgan, D. (2007). Paradigm lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, pp. 112-133.
14. Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (in press). Handbook of Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15. Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16. Orszab, P.R. (October 7, 2009). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies: Increased emphasis on program evaluations. Washington DC: Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget.