A comparison of multi-segment foot kinematics during level overground and treadmill walking

Gait and Posture

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 104-108

  Tulchin, Kirsten ^a   Orendurff, Michael ^a   Karol, Lori ^a  

^a TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

Author keywords

Gait; Multi segment foot kinematics; Overground walking; Treadmill

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTION; ADDUCTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLEXION CONTRACTURE; FOREFOOT; GAIT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOINT FUNCTION; KINEMATICS; LEG MOVEMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; TREADMILL EXERCISE; WALKING; WALKING SPEED;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; FOOT; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WALKING;

EID: 73149090093     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Orendurff M.S., Schoen J.A., Bernatz G.C., Crass S.M., and Klute G.K. How humans walk: bout duration, steps per bout and rest duration. J Rehabil Res Dev 45 (2009) 1077-1090
2. Glaister B.C., Bernatz G.C., Klute G.K., and Orendurff M.S. Video task analysis of turning during activities of daily living. Gait Posture 25 (2007) 289-294
3. Dingwll J., Cusumano J., Cavanaugh P., and Sternad D. Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking. J Biomech Eng 123 1 (2001) 27
4. Alton F., Baldey L., Caplan S., and Morrissey M.C. A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking. J Biomech 13 (1998) 434-440
5. Murray M.P., Spurr G.B., Sepic S.B., Gardner G.M., and Mollinger L.A. Treadmill vs. floor walking: kinematics, electromyogram, and heart rate. J Appl Physiol 59 1 (1985) 87-91
6. Riley P.O., Paolini G., Della Croce U., Paylo K.W., and Kerrigan D.C. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Gait Posture 26 1 (2007) 17-24
7. Benedetti M.G., Leardini A., Bianchi L., Berti L., and Giannini S. Comparisons of outputs of different models for foot kinematics. Proceedings of the international foot and ankle biomechanics congress (2008) 91
8. Canseco K., Long J., Marks R., Khazzam M., and Harris G.F. Quantitative characterization of gait kinematics in patients with hallux rigidus using the Milwaukee Foot Model. J Ortho Res 26 (2008) 419-427
9. Flemister A.S., Neville C.G., and Houck J. The relationship between ankle, hindfoot, and forefoot position and posterior tibial muscle excursion. Foot Ankle Int 28 4 (2007) 448-455
10. Huang U.C., Harbst K., Kotajarvi B., Hansen D., Koff M., Kitaoka H., et al. Effects of ankle-foot orthoses on ankle and foot kinematics in patient with ankle osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87 (2006) 710-716
11. Hunt A.E., and Smith R.M. Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking. Clin Biomech 19 (2004) 391-397
12. Khazzam M., Long J.T., Marks R.M., and Harris G.F. Kinematic changes of the foot and ankle in patients with systemic rheumatoid arthritis and forefoot deformity. J Ortho Res 25 (2007) 319-329
13. Levinger P., and Gilleard W. Tibia and rearfoot motion and ground reaction forces in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome during walking. Gait Posture 25 1 (2007) 2-8
14. Neville C., Flemister A., Tome J., and Houck J. Comparison of changes in posterior tibialis muscle length between subjects with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction and healthy controls during walking. JOSPT 37 11 (2007) 661-669
15. Ness M.E., Long J., Marks R., and Harris G. Foot and ankle kinematics in patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Gait Posture 27 (2008) 331-339
16. Rattanaprasert U., Smith R., Sullivan M., and Gilleard W. Three-dimensional kinematics of the forefoot, rearfoot and leg with the function of tibialis posterior in comparison with normals during stance phase of walking. Clin Biomech 14 (1999) 14-23
17. Ringleb S.I., Karvos S.J., Kotajarvi B.R., Hansen D.K., Kitaoka H.B., and Kaufman K.R. Changes in gait associated with acute stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Gait Posture 25 (2007) 555-564
18. Theologis T.N., Harrington M.E., Thompson N., and Benson K.D. Dynamic foot movement in children treated for congenital talipes equinovarus. JBJS [Br] 85-B (2003) 572-577
19. Tome J., Nawoczenski D.A., Flemister A., and Houck J. Comparison of foot kinematics between subjects with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction and healthy controls. JOSPT 36 9 (2006) 635-644
20. Woodburn J., Nelson K.M., Siegel K.L., Kepple T.M., and Gerber L.H. Multisegment foot motion during gait: proof of concept in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumat 31 10 (2004) 1918-1927
21. Wu W.L., Su F.C., Cheng Y.M., Huang P.J., Chou Y.L., and Chou C.K. Gait analysis after ankle arthrodesis. Gait Posture 11 (2000) 54-61
22. Rao S., Saltzman C., and Yack H.J. Segmental foot mobility in individuals with and without diabetes and neuropathy. Clin Biomech 22 (2007) 464-471
23. Tulchin K, Orendurff M, Adolfsen S, Karol L. Effects of speed on multi-segment foot kinematics. J Appl Biomech, in press.
24. Davis III R.B., Ounpuu S., Tyburski D., and Gage J.R. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci 10 5 (1991) 575-587
25. Tulchin K., and Haideri N. Utility of a multi-segment foot model. Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on the 3D analysis of human movement (2004) 25-28
26. Woltring H.J. A FORTAN package for generalized cross-validatory spline smoothing and differentiation. Adv Eng Software 8 2 (1986) 104-113
27. Perry J. Gait analysis; normal and pathological function (1992), Slack, Thorofare, NJ
28. Wervey R., and Schwartz M. A new device for improving foot marker alignment. Proceedings of the 8th annual GCMAS meeting (2003)
29. Matsas A., Taylor N., and McBurney H. Knee joint kinematics from familiarized treadmill walking can be generalized to overground walking in young unimpaired subjects. Gait Posture 11 1 (2000) 72-79