A test of com therapy in Japan

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 317-324

  Ayres, Joe ^a   Hopf, Tim ^a   Nagami, Kiyoko ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73049113379     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824099909388732     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allen, M., Hunter, J. E., and Donohue, W. A., 1989. Meta-analysis of self-report data on the effectiveness of public speaking anxiety treatment techniques. Communication Education, 38: 54-76.
2. Ayres, J., Ayres, F., Baker, A., Colby, N., DeBlasi, C., Dimke, D., Docken, L., Grubb, J., Hopf, T., Mueller, R., Sharp, D., and Wilcox, K., 1993. Two empirical tests of a videotape designed to reduce public speaking anxiety. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 21 May: 132-146.
3. Ayres, J., Hopf, T., and Peterson, E., in press. A test of COM Therapy. Communication Reports.
4. Beatty, M.J., McCroskey, J.C., and Heisel, A.D., 1998. Communication apprehension as tempermental expression: A communiobiological paradigm. Communication Monographs, 65: 197-219.
5. Booth-Butterfield, M., and Booth-Butterfield, S., The cognitive “Performance Orientation”; in communication anxiety. Paper presented at the annual Speech Communication Association convention. Chicago, IL. November.
6. Condit, C. M., in press. Culture and biology in human communication: Toward a multi-causal model. Communication Education.
7. Doi, T., 1973. The Japanese patterns of communication and the concept of amae. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59: 180-185.
8. Dwyer, K. K., in press. The multidimensional model: Teaching students to self-manage high communication apprehension by self-selecting treatments. Communication Education.
9. Ellis, A., 1962. Reason and emotion in psychotherapy, New York, NJ: Stuart.
10. Friedrich, G., Goss, B., Cunconan, T., and Lane, D., 1997. “ Systematic desensitization ”. In Avoiding Communication, Edited by: Daly, J. A., McCroskey, J. C., Ayres, J., Hopf, T., and Ayres, D., 305-330. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
11. Gudykunst, W., and Nishida, T., 1994. Bridging Japanese/North American Differences, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
12. Honna, N., and Hoffer, B., 1989. An English Dictionary of Japanese ways of thinking, Tokyo, Japan: Yuhikaku Publishing.
13. Ishii, S., and Bruneau, T., 1994. “ Silence and silences in cross-cultural perspectives: Japan and the United States ”. In Intercultural communication: A reader, 7th ed., Edited by: Samovar, L. A., and Porter, R. E., 246-251. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
14. Ito, Y., 1992. “ Theories on interpersonal communication styles from a Japanese perspective: A sociological approach ”. In Comparatively speaking: Communication and culture across space and time: vol. 19. Sage annual reviews of communication research, Edited by: Blummer, J. G., McCleod, J. M., and Rosengren, K. E., vol. 19, 238-268. Belmont, CA: Sage.
15. Kelly, L., and Keaton, J., in press. Treating communication anxiety: Implications of the communibiological paradigm. Communication Education.
16. Klopf, D., 1984. “ Cross-Cultural apprehension research: A summary of Pacific Basin studies ”. In Avoiding Communication: Shyness. Reticence, and Communication Apprehension, Edited by: Daly, J., and McCroskey, J., 157-169. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17. Klopf, D., 1997. “ Cross-Cultural apprehension research: Procedures and Comparisons ”. In Avoiding Communication: Shyness. Reticence, and Communication Apprehension, Edited by: Daly, J., McCroskey, J., Ayres, J., Hopf, T., and Ayres, D., 269-284. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
18. Levine, T. R., and McCroskey, J. C., 1990. Measuring trait communication apprehension: A test of rival measurement models of the PRCA-24. Communication Monographs, 57: 62-72.
19. McCroskey, J. C., 1978. Validity of the PRCA as an index of oral communication apprehension. Communication Monographs, 45: 192-203.
20. McCroskey, J. C., 1997. “ Willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self-perceived communication competence: Conceptualizations and perspectives ”. In Avoiding Communication, Edited by: Daly, J. A., McCroskey, J. C., Ayres, J., Hopf, T., and Ayres, D. M., 75-108. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
21. McCroskey, J. C., and Beatty, M. J., in press. The commurdbiological perspective: Implications for communication in instruction. Communication Education.
22. McCroskey, J. C., and McCroskey, L. L., 1988. Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 5: 108-113.
23. McCroskey, J. C., and Richmond, V. P., 1987. “ Willingness to communicate ”. In Personality and Interpersonal Communication, Edited by: Daly, J. A., and McCroskey, J. C., 129-156. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
24. Motley, M. T., 1995. Overcoming your fear of public speaking: A proven method, College Custom Series New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc.
25. Motley, M., and Molloy, J., 1994. An efficacy test of a new therapy ("Communication Orientation Motivation") for public speaking anxiety. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22: 48-58.
26. Okabe, R., 1983. “ Cultural assumptions of East and West: Japan and the United States ”. In Intercultural communication theory: Current perspectives, Edited by: Gudykunst, W. B., 21-44. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Peterson, H., 1965. A treasury of the world's great speeches, New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
28. Phillips, G. M., 1968. Reticence: Pathology of the normal speaker. Speech Monographs, 35: 39-49.
29. Spielberger, C. D., 1966. “ Theory and research on anxiety ”. In Anxiety and Behavior, Edited by: Spielberger, C. D., 3-20. New York, NY: Academic Press.
30. Wolpe, J., 1958. Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
31. Wolniewitz, R. A., 1997. The conceptual equivalence of communication apprehension in Japan and The United States, Southern Illinois University. Doctoral dissertation.
32. Zakahi, W.R., and McCroskey, J. C., 1989. Willingness to communicate: A potential confounding variable in communication research. Communication Reports, 2: 96-104.