Determinants of pregnancy rate in the donor oocyte model: A multivariate analysis of 450 frozen-thawed embryo transfers

Human Reproduction

Volumn 24, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 3082-3089

  Dessolle, Lionel ^a   Daraï, Emile ^a   Cornet, Dominique ^a   Rouzier, Roman ^a   Coutant, Charles ^a   Mandelbaum, Jacqueline ^a   Antoine, Jean Marie ^a  

^a HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

Author keywords

Frozen embryo transfer; Implantation rate; Oocyte donation; Pregnancy rate

Indexed keywords

GONADORELIN DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; AMENORRHEA; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CRYOPRESERVATION; DOWN REGULATION; EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MODEL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NIDATION; OBESITY; OOCYTE DONATION; OVARY FUNCTION; PREGNANCY RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THAWING; THICKNESS;

EID: 72949110382     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep303     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abdalla HI, Wren ME, Thomas A, Korea L. Age of the uterus does not affect pregnancy or implantation rates: a study of egg donation in women of different ages sharing oocytes from the same donor. Hum Reprod 1997;12:827-829.
2. BellverJ, Rossal LP, Bosch E, Zuniga A, Corona JT, Melendez F, Gomez E, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Obesity and the risk of spontaneous abortion after oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 2003;79:1136-1140.
3. BellverJ, Melo MA, Bosch E, Serra V, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Obesity and poor reproductive outcome: the potential role of the endometrium. Fertil Steril 2007;88:446-451.
4. Bodri D, Colodron M, Vidal R, Galindo A, Durban M, Coll O. Prognostic factors in oocyte donation: an analysis through egg-sharing recipients showing a discordant outcome. Fertil Steril 2007;88:1548-1553.
5. Borini A, Violini F, Bianchi L, Bafaro MG, Trevisi MR, Flamigni C. Improvement of pregnancy and implantation rates in cyclic women undergoing oocyte donation after long-term down-regulation. Hum Reprod 1995;10:3018-3021.
6. Borini A, Bianchi L, Violini F, Macciolini A, Cattoli M, Flamigni C. Oocyte donation program: pregnancy and implantation rates in women of different ages sharing oocytes from single donor. Fertil Steril 1996; 65:94-97.
7. Borini A, Cattoli M, Bulletti C, Coticchio G. Clinical efficiency of oocyte and embryo cryopreservation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008; 1127:49-58.
8. Budak E, Garrido N, Reis Soares S, Barreto Melo MA, Meseguer M, Pellicer A, Remohi J. Improvements achieved in an oocyte donation program over a 10-year period: sequential increase in implantation and pregnancy rates and decrease in high order multiple pregnancies. Fertil Steril 2007;88:342-349.
9. Catteau-Jonard S. [Oocyte donation in France]. Alt medecine de la reproduction 2007;9:407-409.
10. Check JH, O'Shaughnessy A, Lurie D, Fisher C, Adelson HG. Evaluation of the mechanism for higher pregnancy rates in donor oocyte recipients by comparison of fresh with frozen embryo transfer pregnancy rates in a shared oocyte program. Hum Reprod 1995;10:3022-3027.
11. Check JH, Choe JK, Nazari A, Fox F, Swenson K. Fresh embryo transfer is more effective than frozen for donor oocyte recipients but not for donors. Hum Reprod 2001; 16:1403-1408.
12. Del Prato L, Borini A. Best protocol for frozen-thawed embryo transfer-cost benefit analysis needed. Fertil Steril 2006;86:1554-1555.
13. Dessolle L, Biau DJ, de Larouziere V, Ravel C, Antoine JM, DaraT E, Mandelbaum J. Learning curve of vitrification assessed by LC-CUSUM. Fertil Steril 2009; [Epub ahead of print].
14. Diluigi A., Nulsen JC. Effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists on luteal function. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19:258-265.
15. Flamigni C, Borini A, Violini F, Bianchi L, Serrao L. Oocyte donation: comparison between recipients from different age groups. Hum Reprod 1993;8:2088-2092.
16. Garcia-Velasco JA, Isaza V, Caligara C, Pellicer A, Remohi J, Simon C. Factors that determine discordant outcome from shared oocytes. Fertil Steril 2003;80:54-60.
17. Gardner DK, Sheehan CB, Rienzi L, Katz-jaffe C, Larman MG. Analysis of oocyte's physiology to improve cryopreservation procedures. Theriogenology 2007;67:64-72.
18. Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG, Hunter HR, Fitzgerald CT, Home G, Pease EE, Brison DR, Lieberman BA. Cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in natural or down-regulated hormonally controlled cycles: a retrospective study. Fertil steril 2006;85:603-609.
19. GhobaraT, Vandekerckhove P. Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;CD003414.
20. Gonen Y, Casper RF. Prediction of implantation by the sonographic appearance of the endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1990;7:146-152.
21. GunbyJ, Bissonnette F, Librach C, Cowan L, IVF Directors Group of the Canadian Fertility Andrology Society. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2004 results from the Canadian ART Register. Fertil Steril 2008;89:1123-1132.
22. Ledee N, Chaouat G, Serazin V, Lombroso R, Dubanchet S, Oger P, Louafi N, Ville Y. Endometrial vascularity by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound and cytokines: a complementary approach to assess uterine receptivity. J Reprod Immunol 2008;77:57-62.
23. Legro RS, Wong IL, Paulson RJ, Lobo RA, Sauer MV Recipient's age does not adversely affect pregnancy outcome after oocyte donation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172:96-100.
24. Letur-Konirsch H. Oocyte donation in France and national balance sheet (GEDO). Different European approaches. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2004; 32:108-115.
25. McClamrock HD. The great weight debate: do elevations in body mass index (BMI) exert a negative extraovarian effect on in vitro fertilization outcome? Fertil Steril 2008;89:1609-1610.
26. Metwally M, Ong KJ, Ledger WL, Li TC. Does high body mass index increase the risk of miscarriage after spontaneous and assisted conception? A meta-analysis of the evidence. Fertil Steril 2008;90:714-726.
27. Mirkin S, Gimeno TG, Bovea C, Stadtmauer L, Gibbons WE, OehningerS. Factors associated with an optimal pregnancy outcome in an oocyte donation program. J Assist Reprod Genet 2003;20:400-408.
28. Moomjy M, Cholst I, Mangieri R, Rosenwaks Z. Oocyte donation: insights into implantation. Fertil Steril 1999;71:15-21.
29. Noyes N, Hampton BS, Berkeley A, Licciardi F, Grifo J, Krey L. Factors useful in predicting the success of oocyte donation: a 3-year retrospective analysis. Fertil Steril 2001;76:92-97.
30. Pados G, Camus M, Van Waesberghe L, Liebaers I, Van Steirteghem A, Devroe P. Oocyte and embryo donation: evaluation of 412 consecutive trials. Hum Reprod 1992;7:1111-1117.
31. Paulson RJ, Hatch IE, Lobo RA, Sauer MV. Cumulative conception and live birth rates after oocyte donation: implications regarding endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod 1997;12:835-839.
32. Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; Practice Committee of American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril 2008; 90(Suppl. 5): S163-S164.
33. Remohi J, Gallardo E, Guanes PP, Simon C, Pellicer A. Donor-recipient synchronization and the use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists to avoid the premature luteinizing hormone surge in oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 1995; 10(Suppl. 2):84-90.
34. Remohi J, Ardiles G, Garcia-Velasco JA, Gaitan P, Simon C, Pellicer A. Endometrial thickness and serum oestradiol concentrations as predictors of outcome in oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 1997; 12:2271-2276.
35. Riggs R, Mayer J, Dowling-Lacey D, Chi TF, Jones E, Oehninger S. Does storage time influence postthaw survival and pregnancy outcome? An analysis of 11,768 cryopreserved human embryos. Fertil Steril 2008; Nov 20 [Epub ahead of print].
36. Saadat P, Boostanfar R, Slater CC, Tourgeman DE, Stanczyk FZ, Paulson RJ. Accelerated endometrial maturation in the luteal phase of cycles utilizing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: impact of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists versus antagonists. Ferti1 Steril. 2004;82:167-171.
37. Sauer MV, Kavic SM. Oocyte and embryo donation 2006: reviewing two decades of innovation and controversy. Reprod Bl'omed Online 2006; 12:153-162.
38. Sauer MV, Paulson RJ, Lobo RA. Oocyte donation to women of advanced reproductive age: pregnancy results and obstetrical outcome in patients 45 years and older. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:2540-2543.
39. Simon C, Oberye J, BellverJ, Vidal C, Bosch E, Horcajadas JA, Murphy C, Adams S, Riesewijk A, Mannaerts B et al. Similar endometrial development in oocyte donors treated with either high-or standard-dose GnRH antagonist compared to treatment with a GnRH agonist or in natural cycles. Hum Reprod 2005;20:3318-3327.
40. Soares SR, Troncoso C, Bosch E, Serra V, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Age and uterine receptiveness: predicting the outcome of oocyte donation cycles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:4399-13404
41. Soares SR, Velasco JA, Fernandez M, Bosch E, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Simon C. Clinical factors affecting endometrial receptiveness in oocyte donation cycles. Fertil Steril 2008;89:491-501.
42. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 1207-1220.
43. Soderstrom-Anttila V, Vilska S. Five years of single embryo transfer with anonymous and non-anonymous oocyte donation. Reprod Bl'omed Online 2007;15:428-433.
44. Tesarik J, Hazout A, Mendoza C. Luteinizing hormone affects uterine receptivity independently of ovarian function. Reprod Bl'omed Online 2003;7:59-64.
45. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:1856-1864.
46. Toner JP, Grainger DA, Frazier LM. Clinical outcomes among recipients of donated eggs: ananalysis of the US national experience, 1996-1998. Fertil Steril 2002;78:1038-1045.
47. Yaron Y, Ochshorn Y, Amit A, Kogosowski A, Yovel I, Lessing JB. Oocyte donation in Israel: a study of 1001 initiated treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1819-1824.
48. Yavin S, Arav A. Measurement of essential properties of vitrification solutions. Theriogenology 2007;67:81-89.
49. Zenke U, Chetkowski RJ. Transfer and uterine factors are the major recipient-related determinants of success with donor eggs. Fertil Steril 2004;82:850-856.