Comparison of the responsiveness of the Brazilian version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) with DASH, UCLA and SF-36 in patients with rotator cuff disorders

Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 758-764

  Diniz Lopes, A ^a   Ciconelli, R M ^a   Carrera, E F ^a   Griffin, S ^b   Faloppa, F ^a   Baldy Dos Reis, F ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Outcome measures; Quality of life; Questionnaires; Rotator cuff

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISABILITIES OF ARM, SHOULDER AND HAND QUESTIONNAIRE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; ROTATOR CUFF INJURY; SHORT FORM 36; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES SHOULDER RATING SCALE; WESTERN ONTARIO ROTATOR CUFF INDEX;

ADULT; AGED; BRAZIL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROTATOR CUFF; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TENDINOPATHY;

EID: 72949106883     PISSN: 0392856X     EISSN: 1593098X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. GREEN S, BUCHBINDER R, HETRICK S: Physiotherapy interventions for shoulder pain (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, 2005, issue 2, Oxford, Update Software.
2. GREEN SE, BUCHBINDER R, FORBES A et al.: Interventions for shoulder pain (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, 2005, issue 2, Oxford, Update Software.
3. EJNISMAN B, ANDREOLI CV, SOARES BGO et al.: Interventions for tears of the rotator cuff in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 1: CD002758.
4. BOT SDM, TERWEE CB, VAN DER WINDT DWM et al.: Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 335-41.
5. GAY RE, AMADIO PC, JOHNSON JC: Comparative responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, the Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg (Am) 2003; 28: 250-254
6. GADOTTI IC, VIEIRA ER, MAGEE DJ: Importance clarification of measurement properties in rehabilitation. Rev Bras Fisio 2006; 10: 137-146
7. IRRGANG JJ. ANDERSON AF, BOLAND AL et al.: Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34: 1567-1573 (Pubitemid 44385848)
8. HOLTBY R, RAZMJOU H: Measurement properties of the Western Ontario Rotator Outcome Measure: a preliminary report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 506-510
9. LOPES AD, CICONELLI RM, CARRERA EF et al.: The validity and reliability of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) for use in Brazil. Clin J Sport Med 2008; 18: 266-272
10. VIGATTO R, ALEXANDRE NMC, FILHO HRC: Development of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Cross-cultural, adaptation, reliability and validity. Spine 2007; 32: 481-486
11. SOLOMON DH, GABRIEL SE: Quality Measures 101: What every rheumatologist should know. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2007; 25 (Suppl. 47): 18-21.
12. KIRKLEYA, ALVAREZ C, GRIFFIN S: The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for disorders of the rotator cuff: the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. Clin J Sport Med 2003; 13: 84-92.
13. RAZMJOU H, BEAN A, VAN OSNABRUGGE V et al.: Cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two rotator cuff disease-specific outcome measures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 26.
14. LOPES AD, STADNIKY SP, MASIERO D et al.: Translation and cultural adaptation of the WORC: a quality of life questionnaire for rotator cuff disorders. Rev Bras Fisioter 2006; 10: 309-315
15. KIRKLEY A, GRIFFIN S, DAINTY K: Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 2003: 19: 1109-1120
16. EL O, BIRCAN C, GULBAHAR S et al.: The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. Rheumatol Int 2006; 26: 1101-1108 (Pubitemid 44450845)
17. HUBER W, HOFSTAETTER JG, HANSLIKSCHNABEL B et al.: Translation and psychometric testing of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) for use in Germany. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2005; 143: 453-460
18. ORFALE AG, ARAÚJO PMP, FERRAZ MB et al.: Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the reliability of the Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire. Braz J Med Biol Res 2005; 38: 293-302.
19. CICONELLI RM, FERRAZ MB, SANTOS W et al.: Brazilian-Portuguese version of the SF-36. A reliable and valid quality of life outcome measure. Rev Bras Reumatol 1999; 39: 143-150
20. PARK S, STADNIKY SP, RAMOS MMS et al.: (2006) Validation of the Brazilian version of the "Modified - University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale". Proceedings of the VI Brazilian Congress of Shoulder and Elbow, June 1-3, 2006, Goiânia, Brazil.
21. HUSKISSON EC: Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; ii: 1127-1131
22. REVILL SI, ROBINSON JO, ROSEN M et al.: The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 1976; 31: 1191-1198
23. CLARKSON HM: Musculoskeletal assessment. Joint range of motion and manual muscle strength. Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro, 2002.
24. DUTTON M: Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation and Intervention. Artmed, Porto Alegre, 2007.
25. CICONELLI RM, SOÁREZ PC, KOWALSKI CC et al.: The Brazilian Portuguese version of the work productivity and activity impairment - General Health (WPAI-GH) questionnaire. Sao Paulo Med J 2006; 124: 325-332
26. DUNKL PR, TAYLOR AG, MCCONNEL GG et al.: Responsiveness of fibromyalogia clinical trial outcome measures. J Rheumatol 2000; 27: 2683-2691 (Pubitemid 30847948)
27. BEATON DE, KENNEDY CA: Beyond return to work: testing a measure of at-work disability in workers with musculoskeletal pain. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 1869-1879
28. REVICKI DA, CELLA D, HAYS RD et al.: Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient report outcomes. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 70.
29. MICHENER LA, MCCLURE PW, SENNETT BJ: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002; 11: 587-594
30. BEATON DE: Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. Spine 2000; 25: 3192-3199
31. WANG HH, LIAO HF, HSIEH CL: Reliability, sensitivity to change of the Peabody Development motor scale-second edition for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 1351-1359
32. COHEN J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1988.
33. KOCKER MS, STEADMAN RJ, BRIGGS KK et al.: Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee scale for various chondral disorders of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 2004; 86-A: 1139-1145
34. MACDERMID JC, DROSDOWECH D, FABER K: Responsiveness of self-report scales in patients recovering from rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 407-414
35. O'CONNOR DA, CHIPCHASE LS, TOMLINSON J et al.: Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: responsiveness of disease-specific and health-related quality of life outcome measures. Arthroscopy 1999; 15: 836-840
36. BEATON DE, SCHEMITSCH E: Measures of health-related quality of life and physical function. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 413: 90-105. (Pubitemid 38063303)
37. BEATON DE, RICHARDS RR: Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998; 7: 565-572