Review of DOE's Nuclear Energy Research and Development Program

Review of DOE's Nuclear Energy Research and Development Program

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-88

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NUCLEAR ENERGY; NUCLEAR FUELS;

ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; GLOBAL NUCLEAR ENERGY PARTNERSHIPS; IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORIES; NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE; NUCLEAR HYDROGEN INITIATIVES; OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGETS; RESEARCH BUDGET; RESEARCH PROGRAMS;

BUDGET CONTROL;

EID: 85032844776     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.17226/11998     Document Type: Book

References (63)

1. Department of Energy (DOE). 2005. Department of Energy FY2006 Congressional Budget Request. Available at http://www.cfo.doe.gov/ budget/.
2. Department of Energy (DOE). 2004. Department of Energy FY2005 Congressional Budget Request. Available at http://www.cfo.doe.gov/ budget/.
3. DOE. 2005. Department of Energy FY2006 Congressional Budget Request.
4. DOE. 2006. Department of Energy FY2007 Congressional Budget Request.
5. DOE. 2007. Department of Energy FY2008 Congressional Budget Request.
6. Bowman, F.L. 2007. President and CEO, Nuclear Energy Institute, Testimony for the Record to the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, March 16, 2007.
7. Department of Energy (DOE). 2003. Manual 413.3-1, Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, Implementation, Deputy Secretary of Energy Order 2003-004184, March 31, 2003.
8. DOE. 2004. U.S. DOE/Nuclear Industry Strategic Plan for Light Water Reactor R&D, Washington, D.C., February.
9. DOE. 2006. Department of Energy Five Year Plan, Office of the Chief Financial Officer. March 2006.
10. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 1998. Earned Value Management System, ANSI/EIA 748-A-1998.
11. EIA. 2006. Energy and Economic Impacts of H.R. 5049, the Keep America Competitive Global Warming Policy Act, SR/OIAF/2006-03. August.
12. EIA. 2007. Energy Market and Economic Impacts of S. 280, the Climate Stewardship and Innovation Act of 2007, SR/OIAF/2007-04.
13. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). 1990. Advanced Light Water Reactor Utility Requirements Document, Volumes I, II, and III. March.
14. EPRI. 2006. Program on Technology Innovation: Room at the Mountain, Analysis of the Maximum Disposal Capacity for Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel in a Yucca Mountain Repository, EPRI 1013523.
15. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2007. Human Capital Requirements and Anticipated New Reactor Applications Will Challenge NRC's Workforce. GAO 07-105. July.
16. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). 2003. The Future of Nuclear Power, An Interdisciplinary MIT Study.
17. MPR Associates, Inc. (MPR). 2004. Construction Schedule Evaluation, MPR Report 2627. September.
18. MPR. 2004. Application of Advanced Construction Technology to New Nuclear Plants, MPR Report 2610. September.
19. MPR. 2005. DOE NP 2010 Nuclear Power Plant Construction Infrastructure Assessment, MPR-2776. October.
20. National Energy Policy Development Group (NEPDG). 2001. National Energy Policy. May.
21. National Research Council (NRC). 1992. Nuclear Power: Technical and Institutional Options for the Future. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
22. Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee (NERAC). 2001. A Roadmap to Deploy New Nuclear Power Plants in the United States by 2010. Washington, D.C., October 31.
23. Reyes, L. 2006. Semiannual Update of the Status of New Reactor Licensing Activities and Future Planning for New Reactors, SECY-06-001, January 31.
24. Specker, S. 2006. Emission-free Electric Generation Prospects, Resources of the Future Policy Forum. Washington D.C., March 30.
25. Taylor, J.J., and J. Santucci. 1997. The advanced light water reactor programme: An international endeavor. Nuclear Energy 36 (4): 313-321.
26. Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). 2005. ABWR Cost/Schedule/COL Project at TVA's Bellefonte Site. August.
27. University of Chicago (UC). 2004. The Economic Future of Nuclear Power. August.
28. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC). 2006. Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800) Proposed Revisions and Combined License (COL) Application Guidance, November 27. Available at http://www.nrc.gov/ reactors/new-licensing/col-appl-guide.html#draft.
29. Bloomberg Report. 2007. Sasol in talks with PBMR to improve processes. Business Report. February 16, 2007.
30. Chang, Y., P. Finck, and C. Grandy. 2006. Advanced Burner Test Reactor Preconceptual Design Report. ANL-ABR-1, Argonne National Laboratory, September.
31. Department of Energy (DOE). 2002. A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy.
32. DOE. 2004. Next Generation Nuclear Plant, Request for Information and Expression of Interest. May 28.
33. DOE, Office of Nuclear Energy. 2006. The U.S. Generation IV Fast Reactor Strategy. DOE/NE-0130. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy.
34. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). 2003. High-temperature gascooled reactors for the production of hydrogen: An assessment in support of the hydrogen economy. EPRI Report 1007802. Palo Alto, Calif.: EPRI, April.
35. Hall, R.W., and C.A. Chaffey. 1982. Review of the operational experience of the Hinkley Point B AGR over the past two years. Nuclear Energy 21 (February): 41-50.
36. Independent Technology Review Group (ITRG). 2004. Design Features and Technology Uncertainties for the Next Generation Nuclear Plant. INEEL/EXT-04-01816, September.
37. Joeng, Y.H., and M.S. Kazimi. 2005. Attributes of a Nuclear Assisted Gas Turbine Power Cycle. MIT-NES-TR-003, February.
38. Modeen, D. 2006. Testimony to the House Science Committee, April 2006. Available at http://gop.science.house.gov/hearings/energy06/ April%206/Modeen.pdf.
39. National Research Council/National Academy of Engineering (NRC/NAE). 2004. The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
40. Rosenberg, M. 2007. Architecture of nuclear innovations. Energy Biz Magazine (January/February): 52-53.
41. Yildiz, B., M. Petri, G. Conzelmann, and C. Forsberg. 2005. Configuration and Technology Implications of Potential Nuclear Hydrogen System Applications. ANL-05/03, July.
42. Bunn, M., S. Fetter, J.P. Holdren, and B. van der Zwaan. 2003. The Economics of Reprocessing vs. Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel. Harvard University. December.
43. Crozat, M.P. 2007. Evaluating the Economics of GNEP Deployment. January 8. Distributed to the committee by DOE.
44. Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS). 1999. Engineering File-Subsurface Repository. BCA000000-01717-5705- 00005 REV 02 DCN 01. Las Vegas, Nev.: CRWMS Management and Operating Contractor (M&O). ACC: MOL.19990621.0157; MOL.19990615.0230.
45. Department of Energy (DOE). 2005. AFCI, Comparison Report, FY 2005. May.
46. DOE. 2006a. Report to Congress, Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative: Status Report for FY 2005. February.
47. DOE. 2006b. Mission Need Statement for GNEP Technology Demonstration Projects. March.
48. DOE. 2006c. AFCI, Comparison Report, FY 2006 Update. July.
49. DOE. 2006d. GNEP Implementation Strategy. November.
50. DOE. 2007. Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Strategic Plan. GNEP- 167312. January.
51. Hannum, W.H., ed. 1997. Special Issue of Progress in Nuclear Energy 31 (1).
52. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1980. International Nuclear Fuel Cycle Evaluation.
53. Kessler, J. 2006. Program on Technology Innovation: Room at the Mountain, Analysis of the Maximum Disposal Capacity for Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel in a Yucca Mountain Repository. Electric Power Research Institute Report 1013523. May.
54. National Research Council (NRC). 1957. The Disposal of Radioactive Waste on Land, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),.
55. Nuclear Energy Agency. 2002. Accelerator-Driven Systems (ADS) and Fast Reactors (FR) in Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycle.
56. OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency. 2006. Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Radioactive Waste Management, NEA 5990.
57. Wigeland, R.A., T.H. Bauer, T.H. Fanning, and E.E. Morris. 2006. Separations and transmutation criteria to improve utilization of a geological repository, Nuclear Technology 154 (April): 95-106. World Nuclear News (WNN). July 3, 2007.
58. Department of Energy (DOE). 2006. Idaho National Laboratory Ten-Year Site Plan. August.
59. DOE. 2006. INL Strategic Plan: Leading the Renaissance in Nuclear Energy. Summer.
60. DOE. 2006. Laboratory Plan FY2007-2011.
61. DOE. 2006. FY 2006 Report to Congress, Laboratory Directed Research and Development at the DOE National Laboratories.
62. DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration. 2007. NNSA Stockpile Stewardship Plan, (Unclassified) Final Coordination Draft-Working papers (April 2).
63. DOE. 2007. Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request.