Critical analysis of a variational method used to describe molecular electron transport

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 16, 2009, Pages

  Bĝldea, Ioan ^a,b   Köppel, Horst ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE OF SPACE SCIENCES   (Romania)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 72849149255     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.165301     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. J. Heurich, J. C. Cuevas, W. Wenzel, and G. Schön, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 256803 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.256803
2. A. Nitzan and M. A. Ratner, Science 300, 1384 (2003). 10.1126/science.1081572 (Pubitemid 36638150)
3. K. Stokbro, J. Taylor, M. Brandbyge, J.-L. Mozos, and P. Ordejón, Comput. Mater. Sci. 27, 151 (2003). 10.1016/S0927-0256(02)00439-1
4. L. O. Baksmaty, C. Yannouleas, and U. Landman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 136803 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.136803
5. See, for example, New J. Phys 9, 111 (2007), especially the focus articles 111-125. 10.1088/1367-2630/9/5/111 (Pubitemid 46737645)
6. R. Landauer, Philos. Mag. 21, 863 (1970). 10.1080/14786437008238472
7. M. Büttiker, Y. Imry, R. Landauer, and S. Pinhas, Phys. Rev. B 31, 6207 (1985). 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.6207
8. H. Haug and A.-P. Jauho, Quantum Kinetics in Transport and Optics of Semiconductors (Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1996), Vol. 123.
9. S. Datta, Quantum Transport: Atom to Transistor (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2005).
10. S. R. White and A. E. Feiguin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 076401 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.076401
11. A. J. Daley, C. Kollath, U. Schollwöck, and G. Vidal, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2004) P04005. 10.1088/1742-5468/2004/04/P04005
12. A. E. Feiguin and S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B 72, 020404 (R) (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.020404 (Pubitemid 41506809)
13. R. Bulla, T. A. Costi, and T. Pruschke, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 395 (2008). 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.395
14. J. Taylor, H. Guo, and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 63, 245407 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.245407
15. M. Brandbyge, J.-L. Mozos, P. Ordejón, J. Taylor, and K. Stokbro, Phys. Rev. B 65, 165401 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.165401
16. A. R. Rocha, V. M. García-Suárez, S. Bailey, C. Lambert, J. Ferrer, and S. Sanvito, Phys. Rev. B 73, 085414 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.73. 085414 (Pubitemid 43279557)
17. M. H. Hettler, W. Wenzel, M. R. Wegewijs, and H. Schoeller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 076805 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.076805
18. B. Muralidharan, A. W. Ghosh, and S. Datta, Phys. Rev. B 73, 155410 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.155410
19. K. S. Thygesen and A. Rubio, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 091101 (2007). 10.1063/1.2565690 (Pubitemid 46385611)
20. M. A. Reed, C. Zhou, C. J. Muller, T. P. Burgin, and J. M. Tour, Science 278, 252 (1997). 10.1126/science.278.5336.252 (Pubitemid 27450865)
21. X. Xiao, B. Xu, and N. Tao, Nano Lett. 4, 267 (2004). 10.1021/nl035000m (Pubitemid 38292899)
22. T. Dadosh, Y. Gordin, R. Krahne, I. Khivrich, D. Mahalu, V. Frydman, J. Sperling, A. Yacoby, and I. Bar-Joseph, Nature (London) 436, 677 (2005). 10.1038/nature03898 (Pubitemid 41117266)
23. M. Tsutsui, Y. Teramae, S. Kurokawa, and A. Sakai, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 163111 (2006). 10.1063/1.2363995 (Pubitemid 44601724)
24. P. Delaney and J. C. Greer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 036805 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.036805
25. P. Delaney and J. C. Greer, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 100, 1163 (2004). 10.1002/qua.20287
26. P. Delaney and J. C. Greer, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 462, 117 (2006). 10.1098/rspa.2005.1565
27. G. Fagas, P. Delaney, and J. C. Greer, Phys. Rev. B 73, 241314 (R) (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.241314 (Pubitemid 43962718)
28. G. Fagas and J. C. Greer, Nanotechnology 18, 424010 (2007). 10.1088/0957-4484/18/42/424010 (Pubitemid 47479603)
29. I. Bĝldea and H. Köppel, Phys. Rev. B 78, 115315 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.115315
30. Any operator Q can be decomposed in a Hermitian and an anti-Hermitian part, Q= (A+iB) /2 where A= A† and B= B† are Hermitian operators (A≡Q+ Q†, iB≡Q- Q†). Because the complex conjugate of Eq. 4 must also be satisfied, A and B must satisfy similar conditions, □Ψ| A |Ψ□ = □ Ψ0 | A | Ψ0 □ and □Ψ| B |Ψ□ = □ Ψ0 | B | Ψ0 □.
31. C. Caroli, R. Combescot, P. Nozières, and D. Saint-James, J. Phys. C 4, 916 (1971). 10.1088/0022-3719/4/8/018
32. We checked by straightforward numerical calculations that these determinants do not vanish for the case of the point contact attached to long electrodes and for the single electron transistor connected to short electrodes.
33. In ab initio calculations like those of Refs., the equation of continuity 9 has to be imposed not only for a cluster of certain size (N), but also on a spatial grid containing a finite number of points { xl } l=1 Ng, and Ng should also be sufficiently large to ensure convergence.
34. For example, N= (2N N) in a half-filled cluster, where the number of electrons is equal to the number of sites.
35. W. Izumida, O. Sakai, and S. Suzuki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 70, 1045 (2001). 10.1143/JPSJ.70.1045
36. T. A. Costi, Phys. Rev. B 64, 241310 (R) (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevB.64. 241310
37. In fact, it is easy to understand that this result is not limited to the linear response approximation: it is just the exact ground state |G□ of H+W, which minimizes E of Eq. 1. Being an eigenstate, there is no need to impose the equation of continuity. The latter is automatically satisfied in the state |G□, J= Jq, but this ground state cannot sustain a finite current, i.e., J=0. One should remark in this context that the assumption that all the model parameters of the Hamiltonian are real (which allows to consider that all the eigenstates are real) excludes superconductivity: the average of the current operator jq of Eq. 8 vanishes for any real state.
38. R. Baer and D. Neuhauser, Chem. Phys. Lett. 374, 459 (2003). 10.1016/S0009-2614(03)00709-7 (Pubitemid 36742423)
39. W. R. Frensley, Rev. Mod. Phys. 63, 215 (1991). 10.1103/RevModPhys.63.215