Birth order and adult family relationships: Firstborns have better sibling relationships than laterborns

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1029-1046

  Pollet, Thomas V ^a   Nettle, Daniel ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Birth order; Family relationships; Kin selection theory; Relationship quality; Reproductive value; Siblings

Indexed keywords

EID: 72749116169     PISSN: 02654075     EISSN: 14603608     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0265407509347940     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2007). Hamilton's rule and kin competition: The Kipsigis case. Evolution and Human Behavior 28, 299-312.
2. Bromberg, E.A. (1983). Mother-daughter relationships in later life: The effect of quality of relationship upon mutual aid. Journal of Social Gerontological Work, 6, 75-92.
3. Cicirelli, V.G. (1983). Adult children's attachment and helping behavior to elderly parents: A path model. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 815-825.
4. Dykstra, P.A., Kalmijn, M., Knijn, T.C.M., Komter, A.E., Liefbroer, A.C., & Mulder, C.H. (2004). Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study, a multi-actor, multi-method panel study on solidarity in family relationships, Wave 1. NKPS Working Paper No. 1. The Hague: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute. (Version of July 2005).
5. Essock-Vitale, S.M., & McGuire, M.T. (1985). Women's lives viewed from an evolutionary perspective. II. Patterns of helping. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 155-173.
6. Euler, H.A., & Michalski, R.L. (2007). Grandparental and extended kin relationships. In C. Salmon, & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Family Relationships: An evolutionary perspective (pp. 230-256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Freese, J., Powell, B., & Steelman, L.C. (1999). Rebel without a cause or effect: Birth order and social attitudes. American Sociological Review, 64, 207-231.
8. Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour, parts I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-52.
9. Hardman, D., Villiers C., & Roby, S. (2007). Another look at birth order and familial sentiment: Are middleborns really different? Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 197-211.
10. Healey, M.D., & Ellis, B.J. (2007). Birth order, conscientiousness, and openness to experience: Tests of the family-niche model of personality using a within-family methodology. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 55-59.
11. Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley & Sons.
12. House, J.S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K.R. (1988). Structures and processes of social support. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 293-318.
13. Hughes, A.L. (1988). Evolution and Human Kinship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Kennedy, G.E. (1989). Middleborns' perceptions of family relationships. Psychological Reports, 64, 755-760.
15. Kidwell, J.S. (1981). Number of siblings, sibling spacing, sex and birth order: Their effects on perceived parent-adolescent relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 315-332.
16. Kidwell, J.S. (1982). The neglected birth order: Middleborns. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 225-235.
17. Marsden, P.V., & Campbell, K.E. (1984). Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63, 482-501.
18. Menard, S. (1995). Applied Logistic Analysis, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series #106. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
19. Michalski, R.L., & Shackelford, T.K. (2002). An attempted replication of the relationships between birth order and personality. Journal for Research on Personality, 36, 182-188.
20. Nagelkerke, N.J.D. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78, 691-692.
21. Pampel, F.C. (2000). Logistic regression: A primer, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series #132. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
22. Paulhus, D.L., Trapnell, P.D., & Chen, D. (1999). Birth order effects on personality and achievement within families. Psychological Science, 10, 482-488.
23. Peng, C.-Y.J., Lee, K.L., & Ingersoll, G.M. (2002). An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 1-14.
24. Pollet, T.V. (2005). Childlessness and genetic relatedness: their influence on sibling ties in a Post-Industrial society. Unpublished MSc thesis. Liverpool: University of Liverpool.
25. Pollet, T.V. (2007). Genetic relatedness and sibling relationship characteristics in a modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 176-185.
26. Pollet, T.V., & Dunbar, R.I.M. (2008). Childlessness predicts helping of nieces and nephews in United States, 1910. Journal of Biosocial Science, 40, 761-770.
27. Pollet, T.V., Kuppens, T., & Dunbar, R.I.M. (2006). When nieces and nephews become important: Differences between childless women and mothers in relationships with nieces and nephews. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 83-93.
28. Pollet, T.V., & Nettle, D. (2007). Birth order and face-to-face contact with a sibling: Firstborns have more contact than laterborns. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1796-1806.
29. Powell, B., & Steelman, L.C. (1990). Beyond sibship size: Sibling density, sex composition, and educational outcomes. Social Forces, 69, 181-206.
30. Rohde, P.A., Atzwanger, K., Butovskaya, M., Lampert, A., Mysterud, I., Sanchez-Andres, A., & Sulloway, F.J. (2003). Perceived parental favoritism, closeness to kin, and the rebel of the family: The effects of birth order and sex. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 261-276.
31. Rosenthal, C.J. (1985). Kinkeeping and the familial division of labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 965-974.
32. Rossi, A.S., & Rossi, P.H. (1990). Of human bonding: Parent-child relations across the life course. New York: Aldine.
33. Salmon, C.A. (1999). On the impact of sex and birth order on contact with kin. Human Nature, 10, 183-197.
34. Salmon, C.A. (2003). Birth order and relationships: friends, family, sexual partners. Human Nature, 14, 73-81.
35. Salmon, C.A., & Daly, M. (1998). Birth order and familial sentiment: middleborns are different. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 299-312.
36. Steelman, L.C. (1985). A tale of two variables: A review of the intellectual consequences of sibship size and birth order. Review of Educational Research, 55, 353-386.
37. Steelman, L.C., & Powell, B. (1985). The social and academic consequences of birth order: Real, artifactual, or both? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 117-124.
38. Steelman, L.C., Powell, B., Werum, R., & Carter, S. (2002). Reconsidering the effects of sibling configuration: Recent advances and challenges. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 243-269.
39. Suitor, J.J., & Pillemer, K. (2007). Mothers' favoritism in later life: The role of children's birth order. Research on Aging, 29, 32-55.
40. Sulloway, F. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Pantheon.
41. Sulloway, F. (2001). Birth order, sibling competition, and human behaviour. In P. S. Davies, & H. R. Holcomb (Eds.), Conceptual challenges in evolutionary psychology: Innovative research strategies (pp. 39-83). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
42. Trivers, R.L. (1974). Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14, 249-264.
43. Umberson, D. (1992). Relationships between adult children and their parents: Psychological consequences for both generations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 664-674.
44. Zvoch, K. (1999). Family type and investment in education: A comparison of genetic and step-parent families. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 453-464.