Evaluation of the SIFT object recognition method in mobile robots

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 202, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 9-18

  Ramisa, Arnau ^a   Vasudevan, Shrihari ^b   Aldavert, David ^c   Toledo, Ricardo ^c   Lopez De Mantaras, Ramon ^b  

^a ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE IIIA CSIC   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c Computer Vision Center ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

Computer Vision; Mobile Robots; Object Recognition

Indexed keywords

MOBILE ROBOTS; OBJECT RECOGNITION;

GENERIC OBJECT RECOGNITION; MOBILE ROBOTIC; OBJECTS RECOGNITION; PERFORMANCE; REASONING PROCESS; RECOGNITION METHODS; TEXTURED OBJECTS;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 72749100957     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-061-2-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. D. Ballard. Generalizing the Hough transform to detect arbitrary shapes. Pattern recognition, 13(2):111-122, 1981.
2. M. Fischler and R. Bolles. Randomsample consensus: A paradigmfor model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM, 1981.
3. P. Holland and R. Welsch. Robust regression using iteratively reweighted leastsquares. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 6(9):813-827, 1977.
4. V. Lepetit, J. Pilet, and P. Fua. Point matching as a classification problem for fast and robust object pose estimation. In CVPR (2), pages 244-250, 2004.
5. D. Lowe. Local feature view clustering for 3d object recognition. In CVPR (1), pages 682-688. IEEE Computer Society, 2001.
6. D. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2):91-110, 2004.
7. G. Mori, S. Belongie, and J. Malik. Efficient shape matching using shape contexts. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27(11):1832- 1837, 2005.
8. M. Muja and D. Lowe. Fast approximate nearest neighbors with automatic algorithm configuration. In International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications (VISAPP'09), October 2009.
9. N. Pinto, D. D. Cox, and J. J. Dicarlo. Why is real-world visual object recognition hard? PLoS Computational Biology, 4(1):151-156, January 2008.
10. A. Ramisa. Localization and Object Recognition for Mobile Robots. PhD thesis, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, June 2009.
11. A. Ramisa, S. Vasudevan, D. Scaramuzza, R. L. de Ḿantaras, and R. Siegwart. A tale of two object recognition methods for mobile robots. In A. Gasteratos, M. Vincze, and J. K. Tsotsos, editors, ICVS, volume 5008 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 353-362. Springer, 2008.
12. S. Vasudevan, S. Gächter, V. Nguyen, and R. Siegwart. Cognitive maps for mobile robots - an object based approach. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 55(5):359-371, 2007.
13. P. Viola and M. Jones. Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 1, pages 511-518. IEEE Computer Society, 2001.