A heuristic model selection scheme for representing hot flow data using the hot torsion test results

Materials and Design

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 2011-2017

  Khoddam, S ^a   Hodgson, P D ^b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

C. Forming; F. Plastic behaviour; H. Material property databases

Indexed keywords

ALLOYED STEELS; CONSTITUTIVE BEHAVIOUR; F. PLASTIC BEHAVIOUR; H. MATERIAL PROPERTY DATABASE; H. MATERIAL PROPERTY DATABASES; HEURISTIC APPROACH; HEURISTIC MODEL; HOT FLOW; HOT STRENGTH; HOT TORSION; MEASURED DATA; MODEL LIBRARY; MODEL SELECTION; NON-LINEAR; NON-LINEAR MODEL; OPTIMUM MODEL; RATIONAL MODELS;

HEURISTIC METHODS; MATERIALS PROPERTIES; TEST FACILITIES; TORSION TESTING; TORSIONAL STRESS;

STRAIN RATE;

EID: 72749099950     PISSN: 02641275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.027     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Estrin Y., and Mecking H. A unified phenomenological description of work hardening and creep based on one-parameter models. Acta Metall 32 (1984) 57-70
2. Anelli E. Application of mathematical modelling to hot rolling and controlled cooling of wire rods and bars. ISIJ Int 32 (1992) 440-449
3. Rao K.P., and Hawbolt E.B. Development of constitutive relationships using compression testing of a medium carbon steel. J Eng Mater - Trans ASME 114 (1992) 116-123
4. Lin Y.-C., Chen M.-S., and Zhang J. Modeling of flow stress of 42CrMo steel under hot compression. Mater Sci Eng A 499 (2009) 88-92
5. Kim S.I., Lee Y., and Byon S.M. Study on constitutive relation of AISI 4140 steel subject to large strain at elevated temperatures. J Mater Process Technol 140 (2003) 84-89
6. Kong L.X., Wang B., and Hodgson P.D. Prediction of stress-strain behaviors in steels using an integrated constitutive, FEM and ANN Model. ISIJ Int 41 (2001) 795-800
7. Narayan V., Abad R., Lopez B., Bhadeshia H.K.D.H., and Mackay D.J.C. Estimation of hot torsion stress strain curves in iron alloys using a neural network analysis. ISIJ Int 39 (1999) 999-1005
8. Mandal S., Sivaprasad P.V., Venugopal S., and Murthy K.P.N. Artificial neural network modeling to evaluate and predict the deformation behavior of stainless steel type AISI 304L during hot torsion. Appl. Soft Comput. 9 (2009) 237-244
9. Reddy N.S., Park C.H., Lee Y.H., and Lee C.S. Neural network modelling of flow stress in Ti-6Al-4v alloy with equiaxed and Widmanstätten microstructures. J Mater Sci Technol 24 (2008) 294-301
10. Hodgson P.D., Kong L.X., and Davies C.H.J. The prediction of the hot strength in steels with an integrated phenomenological and artificial neural network model. J Mater Process Technol 87 (1999) 131-138
11. Khoddam S., Lam Y.C., and Thomson P.F. An inverse computational method for determining the constitutive parameters using the hot torsion test results. Steel Res 67 (1996) 22-25
12. Gavrus A., Massoni E., and Chenot J.-L. An inverse analysis using a finite element model for identification of rheological parameters. J Mater Process Technol 60 (1996) 447-454
13. Burnham K.P., and Anderson D.R. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd ed. (2002), Springer, New York
14. Golub G.H., and Van Loan C.F. Matrix computations. 2nd ed. (1989), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
15. Marquardt D.W. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 11 (1963) 431-441
16. Khoddam S., and Hodgson P.D. Conversion of the hot torsion test results into flow curve with multiple regimes of hardening. J Mater Process Technol 153-154 (2004) 839-845
17. Hodgson PD, Collinson RC, Perrett B. The use of hot torsion to simulate the thermomechanical processing of steel. In: Suzuki AG, Sakai T, Matsuda F, editors. Physical simulation of casting, hot rolling and welding, NRIM, Tsukuba, Japan; 1997. p. 219-29.
18. Fields DF, Backofen WA. Determination of strain-hardening characteristics by torsion testing. In: Proceedings of the 6th annual meeting of the society. J ASTM 1957;57:1259-72.