Violent Phenotype in SAL Mice is inflexible and fixed in adulthood

Aggressive Behavior

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 430-436

  Natarajan, Deepa ^a   de Vries, Han ^b   de Boer, Sietse F ^a   Koolhaas, Jaap M ^a  

^a University of Groningen Center of Biological Sciences Haren   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aggression; Inflexibility; Mouse; SAL; Violence

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGGRESSION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR GENETICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MALE; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; PHENOTYPE; STATISTICAL MODEL; VIOLENCE;

AGE FACTORS; AGONISTIC BEHAVIOR; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; GENETICS, BEHAVIORAL; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; PHENOTYPE; VIOLENCE;

EID: 72749092482     PISSN: 0096140X     EISSN: 10982337     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ab.20312     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Benus RF, Den Daas S, Koolhaas JM, van Oortmerssen GA. 1990. Routine formation and flexibility in social and non-social behavior of aggressive and non-aggressive male mice. Behaviour 112:176-193.
2. Benus RF, Bohus B, Koolhaas JM, van Oortmerssen GA. 1991a. Heritable variation for aggression as a reflection of individual coping strategies. Behaviour 47:1008-1019.
3. Benus RF, Bohus B, Koolhaas JM, van Oortmerssen GA. 1991b. Behavioral differences between artificially selected aggressive and non-aggressive mice: Response to apomorphine. Behav Brain Res 43:203-208.
4. Caramaschi D, de Boer SF, de Vries H, Koolhaas JM. 2008. Development of violence in mice through repeated victory along with changes in prefrontal cortex neurochemistry. Behav Brain Res 189:263-272.
5. de Boer SF, Koolhaas JM. 2005. 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor agonists and aggression: Pharmacological challenge of the serotonin deficiency hypothesis. Eur J Pharmacol 526:125-139.
6. de Vries H, Netto WJ, Hanegraaf PLH. 1993a. MatMan: A program for the analysis of sociometric matrices and behavioural transition matrices. Behaviour 125:157-175.
7. de Vries H. 1993b. The row-wise correlation between two proximity matrices and the partial row-wise correlation. Psychometrika 58:53-69.
8. Fentress JC. 1976. Dynamic boundaries of patterned behavior: Interaction and self-organization. In: Bateson PPG, Hinde RA (eds.). Growing Points in Ethology. London, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp 35-69.
9. Koolhaas JM, Schuurman T, Wiepkema PR. 1980. The organization of intraspecific agonistic behaviour in the rat. Prog Neurobiol 15:247-268.
10. Krug EG, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, Zwi AB, Lozane R. 2002. World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
11. Kudryavtseva NN. 2000. Experimental approach to the study of learned aggression. Aggr Behav 26:241-256.
12. Kudryavtseva NN, Bondar NP, Alekseyenko OV. 2000. Behavioral correlates of learned aggression. Aggr Behav 26:386-400.
13. McSweeney FK, Swindell S. 2002. Common processes may contribute to extinction and habituation. J Gen Psychol 129: 364-400.
14. Natarajan D, de Vries H, Saaltink D, de Boer SF, Koolhaas JM. 2009. Delineation of violence from functional aggression in mice: An ethological approach. Behav Genet 39:73-90.
15. Van Hooff Jaram. 1982. Categories and sequences of behaviour: Methods of description and analysis. In: Scherer KR, Ekman P (eds.). Handbook of Methods in Nonverbal Behaviour Research. Cambridge, UK: University Press, pp 362-439.
16. Winslow JT, Camacho F. 1995. Cholinergic modulation of a decrement in social investigation following repeated contacts in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 121:164-172.
17. Winslow JT, Miczek KA. 1983. Habituation of aggression in mice: Pharmacological evidence of catacholaminergic and serotonergic mediation. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 81:286-291.