Search based data sensitivity analysis applied to requirement engineering

Proceedings of the 11th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO-2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1681-1688

  Harman, Mark ^a   Krinke, Jens ^a   Ren, Jian ^a   Yoo, Shin ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Data sensitivity analysis; Empirical study; Multi objective genetic algorithms; Multi objective optimisation; Pareto optimality; The next release problem

Indexed keywords

COST ESTIMATE; DECISION MAKERS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; MULTI-OBJECTIVE FORMULATION; MULTI-OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMISATION; PARETO-OPTIMALITY; REAL WORLD DATA; REQUIREMENT ENGINEERING; SEARCH-BASED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; STRONG CORRELATION; VISUALISATION;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COST ACCOUNTING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA HANDLING; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 72749092231     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1569901.1570126     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. ARMOUR, P. Ten Unmyths of Project Estimation. Communications of the ACM 45, 11 (2002), 15-18.
2. BAGNALL, A., RAYWARD-SMITH, V., and WHITTLEY, I. The next release problem. Information and Software Technology 43, 14 (2001), 883-890.
3. BAKER, P., HARMAN, M., STEINHÖFEL, K., and SKALIOTIS, A. Search Based Approaches to Component Selection and Prioritization for the Next Release Problem. In 22nd International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM 06) (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, September 24-27 2006), pp. 176-185.
4. BANJOTOPOULOS, C. A Contribution to the Sensitivity Analysis of the Sea-Bed-Structure Interaction Problem for Underwater Pipelines. Computers & structures 40, 6 (1991), 1421-1427.
5. BOEHM, B., ABTS, C., and CHULANI, S. Software Development Cost Estimation Approaches - A Survey. Annals of Software Engineering 10, 1 (2000), 177-205.
6. BOEHM, B. W. Software Engineering Economics. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1981.
7. CHRISTOPHER FREY, H., and PATIL, S. Identification and Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods. Risk Analysis 22, 3 (2002), 553-578.
8. DEB, K., and GUPTA, H. Searching for Robust Pareto-Optimal Solutions in Multi-Objective Optimization. In Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (EMOa̧ŕ05) (2005), vol. 3410, Springer, pp. 150-164.
9. DEB, K., PRATAP, A., AGARWAL, S., and MEYARIVAN, T. A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on 6, 2 (2002), 182-197.
10. FLYVBJERG, B., HOLM, M. K. S., and BUHL, S. L. Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects. Journal of the American Planning Association 68, 3 (2002), 279-295.
11. FLYVBJERG, B., HOLM, M. K. S., and BUHL, S. L. How (In)ccurate Are Demand Forecasts in Public Works Projects? Journal of the American Planning Association 71, 2 (2005), 131-146.
12. GUNAWAN, R., CAO, Y., PETZOLD, L., and DOYLE, F. Sensitivity Analysis of Discrete Stochastic Systems. Biophysical Journal 88, 4 (2005), 2530-2540.
13. LEVINE, R., and RENELT, D. A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions. American Economic Review 82, 4 (September 1992), 942-63.
14. OSYCZKA, A. Multicriteria Optimization for Engineering Design. In Design Optimization (1985), pp. 193-227.
15. SALTELLI, A., CHAN, K., SCOTT, E., et al. Sensitivity Analysis. Wiley Chichester, 2000.
16. van den AKKER, M., BRINKKEMPER, S., DIEPEN, G., and VERSENDAAL, J. Software Product Release Planning Through Optimization and what-if Analysis. Information and Software Technology 50, 1-2 (2008), 101-111.
17. van VELDHUIZEN, D. A., and LAMONT, G. B. Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Test Suites. In SAC '99: Proceedings of the 1999 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (New York, NY, USA, 1999), ACM, pp. 351-357.
18. ZHANG, Y., HARMAN, M., and MANSOURI, A. The Multi-Objective Next Release Problem. In ACM Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2007). (London, England, 7 - 11 July 2007).