Leukocyte inflammatory response in a rat urinary bladder regeneration model using porcine small intestinal submucosa scaffold

Tissue Engineering - Part A

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 3241-3246

  Ashley, Richard A ^a   Palmer, Blake W ^a   Schultz, Andrew D ^a   Woodson, Benjamin W ^a   Roth, Christopher C ^a   Routh, Jonathan C ^b   Fung, Kar Ming ^a,c   Frimberger, Dominic ^a   Lin, Hsueh Kung ^a,c   Kropp, Bradley P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); MACROPHAGES; SCAFFOLDS; STATISTICAL TESTS; SURVEYING INSTRUMENTS;

BIODEGRADABLE SCAFFOLD; CELL COUNT; CELL DENSITY; CELL TYPES; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STAINING; INFLAMMATORY PROCESS; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; KRUSKAL; MAST CELLS; PER UNIT; REGENERATION MODEL; SMALL INTESTINAL SUBMUCOSA; SPRAGUE-DAWLEY RATS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TIME COURSE; TISSUE REGENERATION; URINARY BLADDER;

SWITCHING CIRCUITS;

TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ANASTOMOSIS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLADDER; CELL COUNT; CELL TYPE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTECTOMY; EOSINOPHIL; FEMALE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INFLAMMATION; INTESTINE GRAFT; LEUKOCYTE; MACROPHAGE; MAST CELL; NEUTROPHIL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SMALL INTESTINE MUCOSA; SWINE; TISSUE REGENERATION;

RATTUS; SUS;

EID: 72649104523     PISSN: 19373341     EISSN: 1937335X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0699     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Atala, A., Vacanti, J.P., Peters, C.A., Mandell, J., Retik, A.B., and Freeman, M.R. Formation of urothelial structures in vivo from dissociated cells attached to biodegradable polymer scaffolds in vitro. J Urol 148, 658, 1992.
2. Kropp, B.P., Eppley, B.L., Prevel, C.D., Rippy, M.K., Harruff, R.C., Badylak, S.F., Adams, M.C., Rink, R.C., and Keating, M.A. Experimental assessment of small intestinal submu-cosa as a bladder wall substitute. Urology 46, 396, 1995.
3. Staack, A., Hayward, S.W., Baskin, L.S., and Cunha, G.R. Molecular, cellular and developmental biology of ur-othelium as a basis of bladder regeneration. Differentiation 73, 121, 2005.
4. Badylak, S.F., Lantz, G.C., Coffey, A., and Geddes, L.A. Small intestinal submucosa as a large diameter vascular graft in the dog. J Surg Res 47, 74, 1989.
5. Roth, C.C., Bell, C.H., Woodson, B., Schultz, A.D., Palmer, B.W., Frimberger, D., Fung, K.M., Lin, H.K., and Kropp, B.P. Temporal differentiation and maturation of regenerated rat urothelium. BJU Int 103, 836, 2009.
6. Kropp, B.P., Cheng, E.Y., Lin, H.K., and Zhang, Y. Reliable and reproducible bladder regeneration using unseeded distal small intestinal submucosa. J Urol 172, 1710, 2004.
7. Kajbafzadeh, A.M., Payabvash, S., Salmasi, A.H., Sadeghi, Z., Elmi, A., Vejdani, K., Tavangar, S.M., Tajik, P., and Mahjoub, F. Time-dependent neovasculogenesis and regeneration of different bladder wall components in the bladder acellular matrix graft in rats. J Surg Res 139, 189, 2007.
8. Broughton, G., II, Janis, J.E., and Attinger, C.E. The basic science of wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 117, 12S, 2006.
9. Nathan, C. Neutrophils and immunity: challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Immunol 6, 173, 2006.
10. Hibbs, J.B., Jr., Granger, D.L., Cook, J.L., and Lewis, A.M., Jr. Activated macrophage mediated cytotoxicity for transformed target cells. Adv Exp Med Biol 146, 315, 1982.
11. Riddle, J.M., and Barnhart, M.I. The eosinophil as a source for profibrinolysin in acute inflammation. Blood 25, 776, 1965.
12. Todd, R., Donoff, B.R., Chiang, T., Chou, M.Y., Elovic, A., Gallagher, G.T., and Wong, D.T. The eosinophil as a cellular source of transforming growth factor alpha in healing cutaneous wounds. Am J Pathol 138, 1307, 1991.
13. Itano, N.M., and Malek, R.S. Eosinophilic cystitis in adults. J Urol 165, 805, 2001.
14. Kleine, T.J., Gleich, G.J., and Lewis, S.A. Eosinophil peroxi-dase increases membrane permeability in mammalian urinary bladder epithelium. Am J Physiol 276, C638, 1999.
15. Yang, J., Torio, A., Donoff, R.B., Gallagher, G.T., Egan, R., Weller, P.F., and Wong, D.T. Depletion of eosinophil infiltration by anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody (TRFK-5) accelerates open skin wound epithelial closure. Am J Pathol 151, 813, 1997.
16. Badylak, S.F., Valentin, J.E., Ravindra, A.K., McCabe, G.P., and Stewart-Akers, A.M. Macrophage phenotype as a determinant of biologic scaffold remodeling. Tissue Eng A 14, 1835, 2008.
17. Martin, P., and Leibovich, S.J. Inflammatory cells during wound repair: the good, the bad and the ugly. Trends Cell Biol 15, 599, 2005.
18. Egozi, E.I., Ferreira, A.M., Burns, A.L., Gamelli, R.L., and Dipietro, L.A. Mast cells modulate the inflammatory but not the proliferative response in healing wounds. Wound Repair Regen 11, 46, 2003.
19. Rao, K.N., and Brown, M.A. Mast cells: multifaceted immune cells with diverse roles in health and disease. Ann NY Acad Sci 1143, 83, 2008.
20. Cairns, J.A. Mast cell tryptase and its role in tissue remodelling. Clin Exp Allergy 28, 1460, 1998.
21. Yamamoto, T., Hartmann, K., Eckes, B., and Krieg, T. Mast cells enhance contraction of three-dimensional collagen lattices by fibroblasts by cell-cell interaction: role of stem cell factor/c-kit. Immunology 99, 435, 2000