Measuring outcomes in nasal surgery: Realities and possibilities

Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 416-419

  Rhee, John S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ESTHETICS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; NOTE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROGNOSIS; STANDARD; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ESTHETICS; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROGNOSIS; RHINOPLASTY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 72449154092     PISSN: 15212491     EISSN: 15383660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archfacial.2009.86     Document Type: Note

References (13)

1. Rhee JS, Arganbright JM, McMullin BT, Hannley M. Evidence supporting functional rhinoplasty or nasal valve repair: a 25-year systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139(1):10-20.
2. Rhee JS, McMullin BT. Outcome measures in facial plastic surgery: patient-reported and clinical efficacy measures. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008;10(3):194-207.
3. Stewart MG, Smith TL, Weaver EM, et al. Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(3):283-290.
4. Alsarraf R. Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: a review and new directions. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2000;24(3):192-197.
5. Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG. Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996;105(6):415-422.
6. Harris DL, Carr AT. The Derrif ord Appearance Scale (DAS59) : a new psychometric scale forthe evaluation of patients with disfigurements and aesthetic problems of appearance. Br J Plast Surg. 2001;54(3):216-222.
7. Carr T, Moss T, Harris D. The DAS24: a short form of the Derriford Appearance Scale DAS59 to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol. 2005;10(pt 2):285-298.
8. Most SP. Analysis of outcomes after functional rhinoplasty using a disease-specific quality-oflife instrument. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006;8(5):306-309.
9. Rhee JS, Poetker DM, Smith TL, Bustillo A, Burzynski M, Davis RE. Nasal valve surgery improves disease-specific quality of life. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(3):437-440.
10. Boyce JM, Eccles R. Assessment of subjective scales for selection of patients for nasal septal surgery. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;31(4):297-302.
11. Apaydin F, Akyildiz S, Hecht DA, Toriumi DM. Rhinobase: a comprehensive database, facial analysis, and picture-archiving software for rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(3):209-211.
12. Garcia GJ, Rhee JS, Senior BA, Kimbell J. Septal deviation and nasal resistance: an investigation using virtual surgery and computational fluid dynamics. Am J Rhinol. in press.
13. Shaneyfelt TM, Center RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. JAMA. 2009;301(8):868-869.