Balanced monitoring of flow phenomena in moving mesh methods

Communications in Computational Physics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 138-170

  Van Dam, A ^a   Zegeling, P A ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Balanced monitor function; Conservative interpolation; Directional adaptation; Hydrodynamics; Implosion problem; Moving mesh method

Indexed keywords

EID: 72449153518     PISSN: 18152406     EISSN: 19917120     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4208/cicp.2009.09.033     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. R. W. Anderson, N. S. Elliott, and R. B. Pember. An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method with adaptive mesh refinement for the solution of the Euler equations. J. Comput. Phys., 199:598-617, Sep 2004.
2. B. N. Azarenok and T. Tang. Second-order Godunov-type scheme for reactive flow calculations on moving meshes. J. Comput. Phys., 206(1):48-80, 2005.
3. G. Beckett and J. A. Mackenzie. Convergence analysis of finite difference approximations on equidistributed grids to a singularly perturbed boundary value problem. Appl. Numer. Math., 35:87-109, October 2000.
4. M. J. Berger,M. J. Aftosmis, and S.M.Murman. Analysis of slope limiters on irregular grids. Technical Report 2005-0490, AIAA Paper, May 2005. Reno, NV, Jan. 2005.
5. J. U. Brackbill. An adaptive grid with directional control. J. Comput. Phys., 108(1):38-50, 1993.
6. J. U. Brackbill and J. S. Saltzman. Adaptive zoning for singular problems in two dimensions. J. Comput. Phys., 46:342-368, 1982.
7. W.-M. Cao, W.-Z. Huang, and R. D. Russell. A study of monitor functions for two-dimensional adaptive mesh generation. SIAMJ. Sci. Comput., 20(6):1978-1994, 1999.
8. H. D. Ceniceros and T. Y. Hou. An efficient dynamically adaptive mesh for potentially singular solutions. J. Comput. Phys., 172(2):609-639, 2001.
9. P. Clément, R. Hagmeijer, and G. Sweers. On the invertibility of mappings arising in 2D grid generation problems. Numerische Mathematik, 73(1):37-51, 1996.
10. Y.-N. Di, R. Li, and T. Tang. A generalmoving mesh framework in 3D and its application for simulating the mixture of multi-phase flows. Commun. Comput. Phys., 3(3):582-602, 2008.
11. Y.-N. Di, R. Li, T. Tang, and P.-W. Zhang. Moving mesh finite element methods for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. SIAMJ. Sci. Comput., 26(3):1036-1056, 2005.
12. A. H. Glasser, V. D. Liseikin, and I. A. Kitaeva. Specification of monitor metrics for generating vector field-aligned numerical grids. Russian Journal of Numerical Analysis and MathematicalModelling, 20(5):439-461, 2005.
13. J.-Q. Han and H. Z. Tang. An adaptive moving mesh method for two-dimensional ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys., 220:791-812, Jan 2007.
14. A.Harten, P. D. Lax, and B. Van Leer. On upstreamdifferencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAMReview, 25(1):35-61, 1983.
15. L. F. Henderson, E. I. Vasilev, G. Ben-Dor, and T. Elperin. The wall-jetting effect in Mach refiection: theoretical consideration and numerical investigation. J. Fluid Mech., 479:259-286, 2003.
16. W.-Z. Huang. Mathematical principles of anisotropic mesh adaptation. Commun. Comput. Phys., 1:276-310, 2006.
17. W.-Z. Huang. Practical aspects of formulation and solution of moving mesh partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys., 171(2):753-775, 2001.
18. M. E. Hubbard. Multidimensional slope limiters forMUSCL-type finite volume schemes on unstructured grids. J. Comput. Phys., 155(1):54-74,October 1999.
19. W.H.Hui, P. Y. Li, and Z.W. Li. Aunified coordinate systemfor solving the two-dimensional Euler equations. J. Comput. Phys., 153:596-637,Aug 1999.
20. J. Lang, W.-M. Cao, W.-Z. Huang, and R. D. Russell. A two-dimensional moving finite element method with local refinement based on a posteriori error estimates. Appl. Numer. Math., 46(1):75-94, 2003.
21. P. D. Lax and X.-D. Liu. Solution of two-dimensional Riemann problems of gas dynamics by positive schemes. SIAMJ. Sci. Comput., 19(2):319-340, 1998.
22. R. Liska and B. Wendroff. Comparison of several difference schemes on 1D and 2D test problems for the Euler equations. SIAMJ. Sci. Comput., 25(3):995-1017, 2003.
23. M. Nool and R. Keppens. AMRVAC: a multidimensional grid-adaptive magneto fluid dynamics code. Comp. Meth. Appl. Math., 2:92-109, 2002.
24. V. V. Rusanov. Calculation of intersection of non-steady shock waves with obstacles. J. Comput. Math. Phys. USSR, 1:267-279, 1961.
25. C. W. Schulz-Rinne, J. P. Collins, and H. M. Glaz. Numerical solution of the Riemann problem for two-dimensional gas dynamics. SIAMJ. Sci. Comput., 14(6):1394-1414, 1993.
26. J. M. Stone, T. A. Gardiner, P. Teuben, J. F. Hawley, and J. B. Simon. Athena: a new code for astrophysical MHD. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 178(1):137-177, 2008.
27. Z.-J. Tan. Adaptive moving mesh methods for two-dimensional resistive magneto-hydrodynamic PDE models. Comput. Fluids, 36:758-771,May 2007.
28. Z.-J. Tan, Z.-R. Zhang, Y.-Q.Huang, and T. Tang. Movingmeshmethodswith locally varying time steps. J. Comput. Phys., 200:347-367,October 2004.
29. H. Z. Tang, T. Tang, and P.-W. Zhang. An adaptivemesh redistributionmethod for nonlinear Hamilton-Jacobi equations in two- and three-dimensions. J. Comput. Phys., 188(2):543-572, 2003.
30. H. Z. Tang and T. Tang. Adaptive mesh methods for one- and two-dimensional hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAMJ. Numer. Anal., 41(2):487-515, 2003.
31. H. Z. Tang. A moving mesh method for the Euler flow calculations using a directional monitor function. Commun. Comput. Phys., 1:656-676, 2006.
32. T. Tang. Moving mesh methods for computational fluid dynamics. In Z.-C. Shi, Z. Chen, T. Tang, and D. Yu, editors, Recent Advances in Adaptive Computation, volume 383 of Contemporary Mathematics, pp. 185-218. American Mathematical Society, 2005.
33. E. F. Toro,M. Spruce, andW. Speares. Restoration of the contact surface in theHLL-Riemann solver. Shock Waves, 4(1):25-34, 1994.
34. E. F. Toro. Riemann solvers and numerical methods for fluid dynamics - A practical intro- duction. Springer-Verlag, 1999.
35. A. van Dam. Go with the Flow. Moving meshes and solution monitoring for compressible flow simulation. PhD thesis, Utrecht University, Dept. of Mathematics, July 2009.
36. B. van der Holst and R. Keppens. Hybrid block-AMR in cartesian and curvilinear coordinates: MHD applications. J. Comput. Phys., 226(1):925-946, September 2007.
37. B. van Leer. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme III. Upstream-centered finite-difference schemes for ideal compressible flow. J. Comput. Phys., 23:263-275, March 1977.
38. B. van Leer. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection. J. Comput. Phys., 23:276-299,March 1977.
39. A. van Dam and P. A. Zegeling. A robust moving mesh finite volume method applied to 1D hyperbolic conservation laws from magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys., 216:526-546, 2006.
40. A. M. Winslow. Adaptive-mesh zoning by the equipotential method. Technical Report UCID-19062, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, 1981.
41. P. Woodward and P. Colella. The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys., 54:115-173, April 1984.
42. P. A. Zegeling. On resistive MHD models with adaptive moving meshes. J. Sci. Comput., 24(2):263-284, 2005.
43. P. A. Zegeling. Theory and application of adaptive moving grid methods. In T. Tang and J. Xu, editors, Adaptive Computations: Theory and Algorithms, chapter 7, pp. 251-296. Science Press, Beijing, 2007.
44. P. A. Zegeling, W. D. de Boer, and H. Z. Tang. Robust and efficient adaptive moving mesh solution of the 2-D Euler equations. In Z.-C. Shi, Z. Chen, T. Tang, and D. Yu, editors, Recent Advances in Adaptive Computation, volume 383 of Contemporary Mathematics, pp. 419-430. American Mathematical Society, 2005.
45. Z. Zhang. Moving mesh method with conservative interpolation based on L2-projection. Commun. Comput. Phys., 1:930-944, 2006.