Time-related histopathologic changes in fresh frozen carotid xenografts in a pig-to-goat implantation model

Artificial Organs

Volumn 33, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 827-834

  Chang, Ji M ^a,b   Kim, Won G ^b  

^a Inje University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Histopathology; Immunohistochemistry; Vascular xenograft; Xenotransplantation

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; GRAFTS; T-CELLS;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS; ARTERIAL GRAFTS; CLINICAL FEASIBILITY; ENDOTHELIAL-CELLS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMPLANTATION MODELS; T LYMPHOCYTES; VASCULAR XENOGRAFT; XENOTRANSPLANTATION;

ENDOTHELIAL CELLS;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTERY GRAFT; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY; CD3+ T LYMPHOCYTE; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; GOAT; GRAFT PATENCY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMPLANTATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE; XENOGRAFT;

ANIMALIA; CAPRA HIRCUS; SUIDAE; SUS;

EID: 72449152735     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00819.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. 1. Parker W, Saadi S, Lin SS, Holzknecht ZE, Bustos M, Platt JL. Transplantation of discordant xenografts: a challenge revisited. Immunol Today 1996;17:373-378 (Pubitemid 26247797)
2. Bach FH, Winkler H, Ferran C, Hancock WW, Robson SC. Delayed xenograft rejection. Immunol Today 1996;17:379-384
3. Chen RH, Kadner AL, Mitchell RN. Fresh porcine cardiac valves are not rejected in primates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:1216-1220
4. 4. Chen RH, Mitchell RN, Kadner A, Adams DH. Differential galactose α(1,3) galactose expression by porcine cardiac vascular endothelium. Xenotransplantation 1999;6:169-172 (Pubitemid 29439061)
5. Chiu JJ, Chen LJ, Chang SF, et al. Shear stress inhibits smooth muscle cell-induced inflammatory gene expression in endothelial cells role of NF-KB. Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol 2005; 25:963-969
6. Kim WG, Sung KI, Seo JW. Time-related histopathologic analyses of immunologically untreated porcine valved conduits implanted in a porcine-to-goat model. Artif Organs 2007;31:105-113
7. Kim WG, Seo JW, Yang JH. Comparative analysis of frozen and acellularized vascular xenografts, lnt J Artif Organs 2005; 28:848-852
8. 8. Macchiarini P, Oriol R, Azimzadeh A. Evidence of human non-α-galactosyl antibodies involved in the hyperacute rejection, of pig lungs and their removal, by pig organ perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:831-843 (Pubitemid 28499178)
9. Kim WS, Seo JW, Rho JR, Kim WG. Histopathologic changes of acellularized xenogenic carotid vascular grafts implanted in a pig-to-goat model. Int J Artif Organs 2006;30:44-52.
10. 10. Nataf P, Guettier C, Nappi F. Influence of arterial allograft preparation techniques on chronic vascular rejection. Transplant Proc 1996;28:2890-2892 (Pubitemid 26339551)
11. 11. Tomizawa Y, Noishiki Y, Okoshi T. Development of a small caliber biologic vascular graft: evaluation of its antithrombogenicity and the early healing process. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1990;36:734-737 (Pubitemid 20367181)
12. 12. Nemcova S, Noel AA, Jost CJ. Evaluation of a xenogeneic acellular collagen matrix as a small-diameter vascular graft in dogs-preliminary observations. J Invest Surg 2001;14:321-330 (Pubitemid 34229003)
13. 13. Allaire E, Guettier C, Bruneval P. Cell-free arterial grafts: morphologic characteristics of aortic isografts, allografts, and xenografts in rats. J. Vase Surg 1994;19:446-456 (Pubitemid 24093978)
14. 14. Pascual G, Martinez S, Rodriguez M. Patency and structural changes in cryopreserved arterial grafts used as vessel, substitutes in the rat. 7 Surg Res 2005;124:297-304. (Pubitemid 40463731)
15. Komorowska-Timek E, Zhang F, Shi DY. Effect of cryopreservation on patency and histological changes of arterial isogenic and allogenic grafts in the rat model. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 49:404-409
16. Mitchell RN. Allograft arteriopathy pathogenesis update. Cardiovasc Pathol 2004;13:33-40.
17. 17. Osako M, Otani H, Yamamura Y. Alloimmune response may be involved in neointimal hyperplasia in cryopreserved aortic allografts. Transplant Proc 2001;33:2566-2570 (Pubitemid 32830223)
18. Libby P, Pober JS. Chronic rejection. Immunity 2001;14:387-397
19. Schmitz-Rixen T, Megerman J, Colvin RB. Immunosuppressive treatment of aortic allografts. J Vase Surg 1988;7:82-92.
20. 20. Solanes N, Rigol M, Castella M. Cryopreservation alters antigenicity of allografts in a porcine model of transplant vasculopathy. Transplant Proc 2004;36:3288-3294 (Pubitemid 41126793)
21. Mesa F, Serra JM, Herreros J. Vascular cryopreservation in microsurgery. / Reconstr Microsurg 1997;13:245-250
22. Ku DD, Willis WL, Caulfield JB. Retention of endotheliumdependent vasodilatory responses in canine coronary arteries following cryopreservation. Cryobiology 1990;27:511-520