CAPITAL JURY DECISION-MAKING: The Limitations of Predictions of Future Violence

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 223-256

  Cunningham, Mark D ^a   Sorensen, Jon R ^b   Reidy, Thomas J ^a  

^a Prairie View A and M University ^*

^b PRAIRIE VIEW A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

capital jury; capital offenders; death penalty; future dangerousness; jury research; prison violence; risk assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 72449139630     PISSN: 10768971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0017296     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1983). Brief for the American Psychiatric Association as amicus curiae in Barefoot v. Estelle, in the United States Supreme Court.
2. American Psychological Association. (2005). Brief for the American Psychological Association as Amicus Curiae in support of Defendant-Appellant in U.S. v. Sherman Lamont Fields, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
3. Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002).
4. Baldi P., Brunak S., Chauvin Y., Anderson C.A.F., and Nielsen H. Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: An overview. Bioinformatics Review 16 (2000) 412-424
5. Balfour v. State, 598 So. 2d 731 (Miss. 1992).
6. Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 (1983).
7. Baze v. Rees, 128 S. Ct. 1520 (2008).
8. Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625 (1980).
9. Blume J.H., Garvey S.P., and Johnson S.L. Future dangerousness in capital cases: Always "at issue.". Cornell Law Review 86 (2001) 387-399
10. Bowers W.J., and Foglia W.D. Still singularly agonizing: Law's failure to purge arbitrariness from capital sentencing. Criminal Law Bulletin 39 (2003) 51-86
11. Bowers W.J., and Steiner B.D. Death by default: An empirical demonstration of false and coerced choices in capital sentencing. Texas Law Review 77 (1999) 605-717
12. Brock D.E., Sorensen J., and Marquart J.W. Tinkering with the machinery of death: An analysis of the impact of legislative reform on the sentencing of capital murderers in Texas. Journal of Criminal Justice 28 (2000) 343-349
13. Burger v. Kemp, 483 U.S. 776 (1987).
14. Butler B., and Moran G. The role of death qualification in venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital Trials. Law & Human Behavior 26 (2002) 175-184
15. Claussen-Schulz A.M., Pearce M.W., and Schopp R.F. Dangerousness, risk assessment, and capital sentencing. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 10 (2004) 471-491
16. Costanzo S., and Costanzo M. Life or death decisions: An analysis of capital jury decision making under the special issues sentencing framework. Law & Human Behavior 18 (1994) 151-168
17. Cunningham M.D. Dangerousness and death: A nexus in search of science and reason. American Psychologist 61 (2006) 828-839
18. Cunningham M.D. Forensic psychology evaluations at capital sentencing. In: Jackson R.L. (Ed). Learning forensic assessment (2007), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Mahwah, NJ 211-238
19. Cunningham M.D. Institutional misconduct among capital murderers. In: DeLisi M., and Conis P.J. (Eds). Violent offenders: Theory, research, public policy, and practice (2008), Jones & Bartlett Publishers, Boston, MA 237-253
20. Cunningham, M. D., & Goldstein, A. M. (2003). Sentencing determinations in death penalty cases (pp. 407-436). In A. Goldstein (Ed.), Forensic psychology (vol. 11). I. Weiner (Ed.), Handbook of psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
21. Cunningham M.D., and Reidy T.J. Antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy: Diagnostic dilemmas in classifying patterns of antisocial behavior in sentencing evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 16 (1998) 333-351
22. Cunningham M.D., and Reidy T.J. Integrating base rate data in violence risk assessments at capital sentencing. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 16 (1998) 71-95
23. Cunningham M.D., and Reidy T.J. Don't confuse me with the facts: Common errors in violence risk assessment at capital sentencing. Criminal Justice and Behavior 26 (1999) 20-43
24. Cunningham M.D., and Reidy T.J. Violence risk assessment at federal capital sentencing: Individualization, generalization, relevance, and scientific standards. Criminal Justice and Behavior 29 (2002) 512-537
25. Cunningham M.D., Reidy T.J., and Sorensen J.R. Is death row obsolete? A decade of mainstreaming death-sentenced inmates in Missouri. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 23 (2005) 307-320
26. Cunningham M.D., Reidy T.J., and Sorensen J.R. Assertions of "future dangerousness" at federal capital sentencing: Rates and correlates of subsequent prison misconduct and violence. Law and Human Behavior 32 (2008) 46-63
27. Cunningham M.D., and Sorensen J.R. Actuarial models for assessment of prison violence risk: Revisions and extensions of the Risk Assessment Scale for Prison (RASP). Assessment 13 (2006) 253-265
28. Cunningham M.D., and Sorensen J.R. Nothing to lose? A comparative examination of prison misconduct rates among life-without-parole and other long-term high security inmates. Criminal Justice and Behavior 33 (2006) 683-705
29. Cunningham M.D., and Sorensen J.R. Capital offenders in Texas prisons: Rates, correlates, and an actuarial analysis of violent misconduct. Law and Human Behavior 31 (2007) 553-571
30. Cunningham M.D., and Sorensen J.R. Predictive factors for violent misconduct in close custody. Prison Journal 87 (2007) 241-253
31. Cunningham, M. D., & Sorensen, J. R. (in press). Improbable predictions at capital sentencing: Contrasting prison violence outcomes. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
32. Cunningham M.D., Sorensen J.R., and Reidy T.J. An actuarial model for assessment of prison violence risk among maximum security inmates. Assessment 12 (2005) 40-49
33. Dawes R.M., Faust D., and Meehl P.E. Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science 243 (1989) 1668-1674
34. Death Penalty Information Center. Number of executions by state and region since 1976 (2009, July 10). http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/number-executions-state-and-region-1976 Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/number-executions-state-and-region-1976
35. Dorland M., and Krauss D. The danger of dangerousness in capital sentencing: Exacerbating the problem of arbitrary and capricious decision-making. Law & Psychology Review 29 (2005) 63-104
36. Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 (1982).
37. Edens J., Buffington-Vollum J., Keilin A., Roskamp P., and Anthony C. Predictions of future dangerousness in capital murder trials: Is it time to "disinvent the wheel?". Law & Human Behavior 26 (2005) 59-87
38. Edens J., Desforges D., Fernandez K., and Palac C. Effects of psychopathy and violence risk testimony on mock juror perceptions of dangerousness in a capital murder trial. Psychology, Crime, & Law 10 (2004) 393-412
39. Eisenberg T., Garvey S.P., and Wells M.T. But was he sorry? The role of remorse in capital sentencing. Cornell Law Review 83 (1998) 1599-1637
40. Flanagan T.J. Time served and institutional misconduct: Patterns of involvement in disciplinary infractions among long-term and short-term inmates. Journal of Criminal Justice 8 (1980) 357-367
41. Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).
42. Gardner v. Florida, 430 U.S. 349 (1977).
43. Garvey S.P. Aggravation and mitigation in capital cases: What do jurors think?. Columbia Law Review 98 (1998) 1538-1576
44. Garvey S.P., Johnson S.L., and Marcus P. Correcting deadly confusion: Responding to jury inquiries in capital cases. Cornell Law Review 85 (2000) 627-655
45. Gendreau P., Goggin C.E., and Law M.A. Predicting prison misconducts. Criminal Justice and Behavior 24 (1997) 414-431
46. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).
47. Haney C., and Lynch M. Comprehending life and death matters: A preliminary study of California's capital penalty instructions. Law & Human Behavior 18 (1994) 411-436
48. Heilbrun K. Prediction versus management models relevant to risk assessment: The importance of legal decision-making context. Law and Human Behavior 21 (1997) 347-359
49. Heilbrun K., O'Neil M.L., Strohman L.K., Bowman Q., and Philipson J. Expert approaches to communicating violence risk. Law and Human Behavior 24 (2000) 137-148
50. Hewitt J.D., Poole E.D., and Regoli R.M. Self-reported and observed rule-breaking in prison: A look at disciplinary response. Journal of Criminal Justice 12 (1984) 437-447
51. Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262 (1976).
52. Krauss D.A., McCabe J.G., and McFadden S. Limited expertise and experts: Problems with the continued use of future dangerous in capital sentencing. In: Schopp R.F., Wiener R.L., Bornstein B.H., and Willborn S.L. (Eds). Mental disorder and criminal law: Responsibility, punishment, and competence (2009), Springer, New York 135-157
53. Light S.C. Measurement error in official statistics: Prison rule infraction data. Federal Probation 54 (1990) 63-74
54. Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978).
55. Luginbuhl J., and Howe J. Discretion in capital sentencing: Guided or misguided. Indiana Law Journal 70 (1995) 1161-1181
56. Marquart J.W., Ekland-Olson S., and Sorensen J.R. Gazing Into the crystal ball: Can jurors accurately predict dangerousness in capital cases?. Law & Society Review 23 (1989) 449-468
57. Marquart J.W., Ekland-Olson S., and Sorensen J.R. The rope, the chair, and the needle: Capital punishment in Texas, 1923-1990 (1994), University of Texas Press, Austin
58. Marquart J.W., and Sorensen J.R. Institutional and post release behavior of Furman-commuted inmates in Texas. Criminology 26 (1988) 677-693
59. Marquart J.W., and Sorensen J.R. A national study of the Furman-commuted inmates: Assessing the threat to society from capital offenders. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 23 (1989) 5-28
60. McCorkle R.C., Miethe T.D., and Drass K.A. The roots of prison violence: A test of the deprivation, management, and "not so total" institution models. Crime & Delinquency 41 (1995) 317-331
61. Monahan J. Predicting violent behavior: An assessment of clinical techniques (1981), Sage, Beverly Hills
62. Otto C., Applegate B., and Davis R. Improving comprehension of capital sentencing instructions: Debunking juror misconceptions. Crime & Delinquency 53 (2007) 502-517
63. Patrick S. Differences in inmate-inmate and inmate-staff altercations: Examples from a medium security prison. The Social Sciences Journal 35 (1998) 253-263
64. Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989).
65. People v. Davenport, 710 P. 2d 861 (Cal. 1985).
66. People v. Murtishaw, 631 P. 2d 446 (Cal. 1981).
67. Pilgrim, R. L., & Sorensen, J. R. (1999). Jury deliberations on future dangerousness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Toronto, Canada.
68. Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242 (1976).
69. Rachal v. State, 917 S. W. 2d 799 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
70. Reidy T.J., Cunningham M.D., and Sorensen J. From death to life: Prison behavior of former death row inmates in Indiana. Criminal Justice and Behavior 28 (2001) 62-82
71. Rogers R. The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior 24 (2000) 595-605
72. Roper v. Simmons. (2005) 543 U.S. 551.
73. Sandys, M., Pruss, H. C., & Walsh, S. M. (in press). Aggravation and mitigation: Findings and implications. Journal of Psychiatry and Law
74. Schopp R.F., and Quattrocchi M.R. Predicting the present: Expert testimony and civil commitment. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 13 (1995) 159-181
75. Schweitzer N.J., and Saks M.J. The gatekeeper effect: The impact of judges' admissibility decisions on the persuasiveness of expert testimony. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law 15 (2009) 1-18
76. Shah S. Dangerousness: A paradigm for exploring some issues in law and psychology. American Psychologist 33 (1978) 224-238
77. Shapiro M. An overdose of dangerousness: How "future dangerousness" catches the least culpable capital defendants and undermines the rationale for the executions it supports. American Journal of Criminal Law 35 (2009) 101-156
78. Slobogin C. Capital punishment and dangerousness. In: Schopp R.F., Wiener R.L., Bornstein B.H., and Willborn S.L. (Eds). Mental disorder and criminal law: Responsibility, punishment, and competence (2009), Springer, New York 119-134
79. Sorensen J.R., and Cunningham M.D. Operationalizing risk: The influence of measurement choice on the prevalence and correlates of violence among incarcerated murderers. Journal of Criminal Justice 35 (2007) 546-555
80. Sorensen, J. R., & Cunningham, M. D. (in press a). Conviction offense and prison violence: A comparative study of murderers and other offenders. Crime & Delinquency
81. Sorensen, J. R., & Cunningham, M. D. (in press b). Once a killer always a killer? Prison misconduct of former death-sentenced inmates in Arizona. Journal of Psychiatry and Law
82. Sorensen J.R., and Marquart J.W. Prosecutorial and jury decision making in post-Furman Texas capital cases. New York University Review of Law and Social Change 18 (1990-1991) 743-776
83. Sorensen J.R., and Pilgrim R.L. An actuarial risk assessment of violence posed by capital murder defendants. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 90 (2000) 1251-1270
84. Sorensen J.R., and Wrinkle R.D. No hope for parole: Disciplinary infractions among death-sentenced and life-without-parole inmates. Criminal Justice and Behavior 23 (1996) 542-552
85. Spaziano v. Florida, 468 U.S. 447 (1984).
86. Steinke P. Using situational factors to predict types of prison violence. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 17 (1991) 119-132
87. Sundby S. The capital jury and absolution: The intersection of trial strategy, remorse, and the death penalty. Cornell Law Review 83 (1998) 1557-1598
88. Texas Psychological Association. Brief of the amici curiae Texas Psychological Association and Texas Appleseed in Support of Appellant, Noah Espada vs. The State of Texas, in the Court of Criminal Appeals of Austin, Texas (2007)
89. U.S. Department of Justice. Fact sheet: Prosecuting and detaining terror suspects in the U.S. criminal justice system (2009). http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2009/June/09-ag-564.html Retrieved July 11, 2009, from http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2009/June/09-ag-564.html
90. United States v. Sablan, 555 F. Supp. 2d 1177 (D. Colo. 2007).
91. White L.T. Juror decision-making in the capital penalty trial: An analysis of crimes and defense strategies. Law & Human Behavior 11 (1987) 113-130
92. Wolff N., Blitz C.L., Shi J., Siegel J., and Bachman R. Physical violence inside prisons: Rates of victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior 34 (2007) 588-599
93. Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976).