Phishing detection using classifier ensembles

2009 eCrime Researchers Summit, eCRIME '09

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Toolan, Fergus ^a   Carthy, Joe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFIER ENSEMBLES; HIGH PRECISION; INDIVIDUAL CLASSIFIERS; PHISHING;

CLASSIFIERS; ELECTRONIC MAIL;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 72449135688     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ECRIME.2009.5342607     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Abu-Nimeh, S., Nappa, D., Wang, X., & Nair, S. A Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for Phishing Detection, in Proceedings of the APWG eCrime Researchers Summit, Pittsburgh, USA, 2007.
2. The Anti-Phishing Work Group, http://www.apwg.org/, Last accessed June 2009.
3. nd Half 2008, Available at http://www.apwg.org/reports/apwg- report-H2-2008.pdf, 2009.
4. Bergholz, A., De Beer, J., Glahn, S., Moens, M-F., Paaß, G. & Strobel, S. New Filtering Approaches for Phishing Email, to appear in the Journal of Computer Security, 2009.
5. Cortes, C. & Vapnik, V. Support Vector Networks in Machine Learning, Vol. 20, pp. 273-297, 1995.
6. Cyveillance Report, The Cost of Phishing: Understanding the True Cost Dynamics Behind Phishing Attacks, available at http://www.apwg.org/sponsors- technical-papers/, October 2008.
7. th Ed., Duxbury Press, 2004.
8. Fette, I., Sadeh, N., & Tomasic, A. Learning to Detect Phishing Emails, Technical Report, Institute for Software Research International, School of Computer Science, Carneige Mellon University, 2006.
9. Joachims, T. Text Categorization for Support Vector Machines Technical Report, LS VIII, Number 23, University of Dortmund, 1997.
10. Kuncheva, L. I., & Whitaker, C. J. Measures of Diversity in Classifier Ensembles, in Machine Learning, Vol. 51, pp. 181 - 207, 2003.
11. Mitchell, T. Machine Learning, Mcgraw-Hill, 1997.
12. Nazario, J. Phishing Corpus, From http://www.monkey.org/jose/wiki/doku. php?id=phishingcorpus. Last accessed June 2009.
13. Quinlan, J. R. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning, MorganKaufmann Publishers 1993.
14. Quinlan, J. R. Is See5/C5.0 Better Than C4.5?, available at http://www.rulequest.com/see5-comparison.html. Last accessed June 2009.
15. th International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems, CA, USA, 2005.
16. Ronda, T., Saroiu, S., & Wolman, A. iTrustPage: A User-Assisted Anti-Phishing Tool, in Proceedings of EuroSys 2008, Glasgow, Scotland, 2008.
17. Sheng, S., Magnien, B., Kumaraguru, P., Acquisti, A., Cranor, L., Hong, J., & Nunge, E. Anti-Phishing Phil: The Design and Evaluation of a Game that Teaches People Not to Fall for Phish in Proceedings of the 2007 Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, Pittsburgh, PA, July, 2007.
18. Spam Assassin Project, Ham Email Corpus, http://spamassassin.apache.org/ publiccorpus/. Last Accessed June 2009.
19. Toolan, F. Diversity Metrics for Ensemble Learning, PhD Thesis, University College Dublin, 2007.
20. Vapnik, V. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer-Verlag, 1995.
21. th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 2005.