Re-consenting human subjects: Ethical, legal and practical issues

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 656-657

  Resnik, D B ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGAL ASPECT; NOTE; RESEARCH ETHICS;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMAN RIGHTS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT;

EID: 72449134312     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2009.030338     Document Type: Note

References (13)

1. National Institutes of Health. Nuremberg Code. Office of Human Subjects Research. Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg military tribunals under Control Council Law no 10, vol 2, pp 181-182. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1949. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html (accessed 23 Feb 2009).
2. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki, ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, revised October 2008. http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm (accessed 23 Feb 2009).
3. National Institutes of Health. Nuremberg Code. Office of Human Subjects Research. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: ethical principles for the protection of human subjects in research. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1979. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html (accessed 23 Feb 2009).
4. US Department of Health and Human Services. Code of Federal Regulations,no 46. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm (accessed 23 Feb 2009).
5. Berg J, Applebaum P, Parker L, et al. Informed consent: legal theory and clinical practice, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
6. Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
7. US Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Human Research Protections. Informed consent frequently asked questions. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/ informconsfaq.html (accessed 23 Feb 2009).
8. Wendler D, Rackoff J. Consent for continuing research participation: what is it and when should it be obtained? IRB Ethics Hum Res 2002;24:1-6.
9. Dal-Ré R, Avendaño C, Gil-Aguado A, et al. When should re-consent of subjects participating in a clinical trial be requested? A case-oriented algorithm to assist in the decision-making process. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008;83:788-93.
10. Renegar G, Webster C, Stuerzebecher S, et al. Returning genetic research results to individuals: points to consider. Bioethics 2006;20:24-36.
11. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services. The Sister Study. 2008 Newsletter. http://www.sisterstudy.org/english/images/0208newsletter.pdf (accessed 23 Feb 2009).
12. Burke W, Diekema D. Ethical issues arising from the participation of children in genetic research. J Pediatr 2006;149(Suppl 1):S34-8.
13. Sugarman J, Siegel A. When embryonic stem cell lines fail to meet consent standards. Science 2008;322:379.