Comparison of 10 hemostatic dressings in a groin transection model in swine

Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 848-855

  Arnaud, Françoise ^a,b   Parreño Sadalan, Dione ^b   Tomori, Toshiki ^a   Delima, Mariam Grace ^b   Teranishi, Kohsuke ^a   Carr, Walter ^a   McNamee, George ^b   McKeague, Anne ^a   Govindaraj, Krishnanurthy ^b   Beadling, Charles ^b   Lutz, Clifford ^b   Sharp, Trueman ^b   Mog, Steven ^c   Burris, David ^b   McCarron, Richard ^a,b  

^a NAVAL MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center   (United States)

^c ARMED FORCES RADIOBIOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bleeding; Hemostasis; Noncompressible wound; Uncontrolled hemorrhage

Indexed keywords

ABSORBENT; HEMOSTATIC AGENT;

ABSORPTION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BANDAGE; BLEEDING; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; BLOOD VOLUME; COLLOID; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSION BANDAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMORAL ARTERY; FEMORAL VEIN; GAUZE DRESSING; HEMOSTASIS; INCIDENCE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFUSION; INGUINAL REGION; INJURY SEVERITY; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NONHUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURVIVAL RATE; SWINE; TEMPERATURE; TISSUE INJURY; VASCULAR SURGERY; VASCULARIZATION; VITAL SIGN; WOUND ASSESSMENT; WOUND DRESSING;

ABSORPTION; ANIMALS; BANDAGES; BIOPOLYMERS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GROIN; HEMOSTATIC TECHNIQUES; MATERIALS TESTING; SHOCK, HEMORRHAGIC; SWINE;

EID: 72449132894     PISSN: 00225282     EISSN: 15298809     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b2897f     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Hoyt RW, Reifman J, Coster TS, Buller MJ. Combat medical informatics: present and future. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002;335-339.
2. Zeller J, Fox A, Pryor JP. Beyond the battlefield. The use of hemostatic dressings in civilian EMS. JEMS. 2008;33:102-109.
3. Lounsbury DE, Ballamy RF. Emergency War Surgery. ed 3rd. US Revision. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office; 2004.
4. Alam HB, Uy GB, Miller D, et al. Comparative analysis of hemostatic agents in a swine model of lethal groin injury. J Trauma. 2003;54:1077-1082.
5. Alam HB, Chen Z, Jaskille A, et al. Application of a zeolite hemostatic agent achieves 100% survival in a lethal model of complex groin injury in Swine. J Trauma. 2004;56:974-983.
6. Carraway JW, Kent D, Young K, Cole A, Friedman R, Ward KR. Comparison of a new mineral based hemostatic agent to a commercially available granular zeolite agent for hemostasis in a swine model of lethal extremity arterial hemorrhage. Resuscitation. 2008;78:230-235.
7. Horton JW, Garcia NM, Stone KR. Evaluation of a new hemostatic agent in experimental splenic laceration. Arch Surg. 1995;130:161-164.
8. Pusateri AE, Delgado AV, Dick EJ Jr, Martinez RS, Holcomb JB, Ryan KL. Application of a granular mineral-based hemostatic agent (Quik- Clot) to reduce blood loss after grade V liver injury in swine. J Trauma. 2004;57:555-562; discussion 562.
9. Pusateri AE, Holcomb JB, Kheirabadi BS, Alam HB, Wade CE, Ryan KL. Making sense of the preclinical literature on advanced hemostatic products. J Trauma. 2006;60:674-682.
10. Acheson EM, Kheirabadi BS, Deguzman R, Dick EJ Jr, Holcomb JB. Comparison of hemorrhage control agents applied to lethal extremity arterial hemorrhages in swine. J Trauma. 2005;59:865- 874; discussion 874-875.
11. Arnaud F, Tomori T, Saito R, McKeague A, Prusaczyk WK, McCarron RM. Comparative efficacy of granular and bagged formulations of the hemostatic agent QuikClot. J Trauma. 2007;63:775-782.
12. Sondeen JL, Pusateri AE, Coppes VG, Gaddy CE, Holcomb JB. Comparison of 10 different hemostatic dressings in an aortic injury. J Trauma. 2003;54:280-285.
13. Jewelewicz DD, Cohn SM, Crookes BA, Proctor KG. Modified rapid deployment hemostat bandage reduces blood loss and mortality in coagulopathic pigs with severe liver injury. J Trauma. 2003;55:275- 280; discussion 280-281.
14. Kozen BG, Kircher SJ, Henao J, Godinez FS, Johnson AS. An alternative hemostatic dressing: comparison of CELOX, HemCon, and Quik- Clot. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:74-81.
15. Pusateri AE, Modrow HE, Harris RA, et al. Advanced hemostatic dressing development program: animal model selection criteria and results of a study of nine hemostatic dressings in a model of severe large venous hemorrhage and hepatic injury in Swine. J Trauma. 2003;55: 518-526.
16. Alam HB, Burris D, DaCorta JA, Rhee P. Hemorrhage control in the battlefield: role of new hemostatic agents. Mil Med. 2005;170:63-69.
17. Wedmore I, McManus JG, Pusateri AE, Holcomb JB. A special report on the chitosan-based hemostatic dressing: experience in current combat operations. J Trauma. 2006;60:655-658.
18. Rhee P, Brown C, Martin M, et al. QuikClot use in trauma for hemorrhage control: case series of 103 documented uses. J Trauma. 2008;64:1093-1099.
19. Wright JK, Kalns J, Wolf EA, et al. Thermal injury resulting from application of a granular mineral hemostatic agent. J Trauma. 2004;57: 224-230.
20. Arnaud F, Tomori T, Carr W, et al. Exothermic reaction in zeolite hemostatic dressings: QuikClot ACS and ACS. Ann Biomed Eng. 2008;36:1708-1713.
21. Ahuja N, Ostomel TA, Rhee P, et al. Testing of modified zeolite hemostatic dressings in a large animal model of lethal groin injury. J Trauma. 2006;61:1312-1320.
22. American College of Surgeons. ATLS Advanced Trauma Life Support Program for Doctors. ed 7. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2004.