Behavioural indicators of pain in crustacean decapods

Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 432-438

  Gherardi, Francesca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Animal welfare; Behaviour; Crustacean decapods; Pain

Indexed keywords

EID: 72449131892     PISSN: 00212571     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0021-25712009000400013     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Bateson P. assessment of pain in animals. Anim Behav 1991;42:827-39.
2. Sherwin cM. can invertebrates suffer? Or how robust is argument-by-analogy? Anim Welfare 2001;10:S103-8.
3. Stevens CW. alternatives to the use of mammals for pain research. Life Sci 1992;50:901-12.
4. Elwood RW, appel M. Pain experience in hermit crabs? Anim Behav 2009;77:1243-46.
5. Sneddon LU, Braithwaite Va, Gentle MJ. Do fshes have nociceptors? evidence for the evolution of a vertebrate sensory system. Proc Roy Soc B 2003;270:1115-21.
6. Loeser JD, treede R-D. the Kyoto protocol of IASP Basic Pain terminology. Pain 2008;137:473-7.
7. Zimmerman M. Physiological mechanisms of pain and its treatment. Klinische Anaesthesiol Intensivether 1986;32:1-19.
8. Broom DM. evolution of pain. In: Lord Soulsby eJL, Morton D (ed.). Pain: Its nature and management in man and animals. Proceedings of the royal Society of Medicine International congress Symposium Series, vol. 246. London: royal Society of Medicine; 2001. p. 17-25.
9. Mather Ja. animal suffering: an invertebrate perspective. J Appl Anim Welfare Sci 2001;4:151-6.
10. Office of technology assessment, US congress. Alternatives to animal use in research, testing and education. Washington Dc: US Government Printing Office; 1986.
11. eisemann cH, Jorgensen WK, Merritt DJ, rice MJ, Cribb BW, Webb PD, Zalucki MP. Do insects feel pain? A biological view. Experentia 1984;40:164-7.
12. Wigglesworth VB. Do insects feel pain? Antenna 1980;4:8-9.
13. Varner G. How facts matter - on the language condition and thescope of pain in the animal kingdom. Pain Forum 1999;8:84-6.
14. Broom DM. Cognitive ability and sentience: which aquatic animals should be protected? Dis Aquat Org 2007;75:99-108.
15. Bradshaw eL, Bateson P. Welfare implications of culling red deer (Cervus elaphus). Anim Welfare 2000;9:3-24.
16. Mason GJ, Cooper J, Clarebrough C. Frustrations of furfarmed mink: mink may thrive in captivity but they miss having water to romp about in. Nature 2001;410:35-6.
17. Molony V, Kent Je, McKendrick IJ. Validation of a method for assessment of acute pain in lambs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2002;76:215-38.
18. Smith Ja, Boyd KM. Lives in the balance: The ethics of using animals in biomedical research. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991.
19. Dawkins MS. through animal eyes: what behaviour tells us. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006;100:4-10.
20. Mather JA, anderson RC. ethics and invertebrates: a cephalopod perspective. Dis Aquat Org 2007;75:119-29.
21. Barr S, Laming PR, Dick Jta, elwood RW. Nociception or pain in a decapod crustacean? Anim Behav 2008;75:745-51.
22. Elwood RW, Barr S, Patterson L. Pain and stress in crustaceans? Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009;118:128-36.
23. Stasiak KL, Maul D, French e, Hellyer P, Vanderwoude S. Species-specific assessment of pain in laboratory animals. Con Top Lab Anim Sci 2003;42:13-20.
24. Weary DM, Neil L, Flower Fc, Fraser D. Identifying and preventing pain in animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006;100:64-76.
25. Fiorito G. Is there "pain" in invertebrates? Behav Process 1986;12:383-8.
26. Millsopp S, Laming P. trade-offs between feeding and shock avoidance in goldfsh (Carassius auratus). Appl Anim Behav Sci 2008;113:247-54.
27. Kawai N, Kono r, Sugimoto S. Avoidance learning in the crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) depends on the predatory imminence of the unconditioned stimulus: a behavior systems approach to leaning in invertebrates. Behav Brain Res 2004;150:229-37.
28. Denti A, Dimant B, Maldonado H. Passive avoidance learning in the crab Chasmagnathus granulatus. Physiol Behav 1988;43:317-20.
29. Fernandez-Duque E, Valeggia C, Maldonado H. Multitrial inhibitory avoidance learning in the crab Chasmagnathus. Behav Neur Biol 1992;57:189-97.
30. Bolles RC. Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning. Psychol Rev 1970;77:32-48.
31. Mather JA. Cephalopod consciousness: Behavioural evidence. Conscious Cogn 2008;17:37-48.
32. Edelman DB, Baars BJ, Seth AK. Identifying hallmarks of consciousness in non-mammalian species. Conscious Cogn 2005;14:169-87.
33. Baars BJ. In the theatre of consciousness: Global workspace theory: a rigorous scientific theory of consciousness. J Consciousness Stud 1997;4:292-309.
34. Czeschlik T. Animal cognition - the phylogeny and ontogeny of cognitive abilities. Anim Cogn 1998;1:1-2.
35. Dawkins MS. Animal suffering: the science of animal welfare. London: chapman & Hall; 1992.
36. Aquiloni L, Gherardi F. Mutual mate choice in crayfish: large body size is selected by both sexes, virginity by males only. J Zool London 2008; 274:171-9.
37. Aquiloni L, Gherardi F. Mate assessment by size in the red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii: effects of chemical versus visual cues. Freshw Biol 2008;53:461-9.
38. Aquiloni L, Massolo A, Gherardi F. Sex identification in female crayfish is bimodal. Naturwissenschaften 2009;96:103-10.
39. Aquiloni L, Gherardi F. Evidence of cryptic mate choice in crayfish. Biol Lett 2008;4:163-5.
40. aquiloni L, Buřič M, Gherardi F. Crayfish females eavesdrop on fighting males before choosing the dominant mate. Current Biol 2008;18:462-3.
41. aquiloni L, Gherardi F. crayfish females eavesdrop on fighting males and use smell and sight to recognize the identity of the winner. Anim Behav 2009 (in press).
42. Tricarico E, Gherardi F. Shell acquisition in hermit crabs. Which tactic is more efficient? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2006;60:492-500.
43. Elwood RW, Stewart A. The timing of decisions during shell investigation by the hermit crab, Pagurus bernhardus. Anim Behav 1985;33:620-7.
44. Jackson NW, Elwood RW. 1989. How animals make assessments: information gathering by the hermit crab, Pagurus bernhardus. Anim Behav 1989;38:951-7.
45. Elwood RW, Pothanikat E, Briffa M. Honest and dishonest displays, motivatioccnal state, and subsequent decisions in hermit crab shell fights. Anim Behav 2006;72:853-9.
46. Gherardi F. Fighting behavior in hermit crabs: the combined effect of resource-holding potential and resource value in Pagurus longicarpus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2006;59:500-10.
47. Tricarico E, Gherardi F. resource assessment in hermit crabs: the worth of their own shell. Behav Ecol 2007;18:615-20.
48. Dowds BM, Elwood RW. Shell wars: assessment strategies and the timing of decisions in hermit crab fights. Behaviour 1983;85:1-24.
49. Briffa M, Elwood RW, Dick Jta. analyses of repeated signals during hermit crab shell fights. Proc Roy Soc B 1998;265:1467-74.
50. Tricarico E, Gherardi F. The past ownership of a resource affects the agonistic behavior of hermit crabs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2007;61:1945-53.
51. Briffa M, elwood RW. Use of energy reserves in fighting hermit crabs. Proc Roy Soc B 2004;271:373-9.
52. Briffa M, elwood rW. Decision rules, energy metabolism and vigour of hermit crab fghts. Proc Roy So B 2001; 268:1841-7.
53. Briffa M., Elwood RW. Eapid change in energetic status in fghting animals: causes and effects of strategic decisions. Anim Behav 2005; 7:119-24.
54. Derby C D. Learning from spiny lobsters about chemosensory coding of mixtures. Physiol Behav 2000;69:203-9.
55. Fine-Levy JB, Girardot M-N, Derby CD, Daniel PC. Differential associative conditioning and olfactory discrimination in the spiny lobster Panulirus argus. Behav Neural Biol 1988;49:315-31.
56. Karavanich C, Atema J. Individual recognition and memory in lobster dominance. Anim Behav 1998;56:1553-60.
57. Hazlett BA. Predator recognition and learned irrelevance in the crayfsh Orconectes virilis. Ethology 2003;109:765-80.
58. Gherardi F, Tricarico E, Atema J. Unraveling the nature of individual recognition by odor in hermit crabs. J Chem Ecol 2005;31:2877-96.
59. Breithaupt T, Atema J. The timing of chemical signaling with urine in dominance fights of male lobsters (Homarus americanus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2000;49:67-78.
60. Breithaupt t, eger P. Urine makes the difference: chemical communication in fighting crayfish made visible. J Exp Biol 2002;205:1221-31.
61. Moore PA. Agonistic behavior in freshwater crayfish: the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on aggressive behaviour and dominance. In: Je Duffy, M thiel (ed.). Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems: Crustacea as model organisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 90-114.
62. Gherardi F, Tiedemann J. Binary individual recognition in hermit crabs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2004;55:524-30.
63. Gherardi F, tiedemann J. Chemical cues and binary individual recognition in the hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus. J Zool London 2004;263:23-9.
64. Gherardi F, atema J. Memory of social partners in hermit crab dominance. Ethology 2005;111:271-85.
65. Papi F. General aspects. In: F Papi (ed.). Animal homing. London: chapman & Hall; 1992. p. 6-18.
66. Vannini M, Cannicci S. Homing behaviour and possible cognitive maps in crustacean decapods. J Exp Mar. Biol Ecol 1995;193:67-91.
67. Zeil J, Hemmi JM. The visual ecology of fiddler crabs. J Comp Physiol A 2006;192:1-25.
68. Lohmann KJ, Pentcheff ND, Nevitt GA, Stetten GD, Zimmerfaust RK, Jarrard HE, Boles LC. Magnetic orientation of spiny lobsters in the ocean: experiments with undersea coil systems. J Exp Biol 1995;198:2041-8.
69. Boles LC, Lohmann KJ 2003. True navigation in spiny lobsters. Nature 2003;421:60-3.
70. Vezzosi r, anyona D, Barbaresi S, Vannini M. activity pattern in Thalamita crenata (Portunidae, Decapoda) : a shaping by the tidal cycle. Mar. Behav Physiol 1994;24:207-14.
71. Cannicci S, Anyona D, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Vannini M. Homing in the mangrove swimming crab Thalamita crenata (Decapoda, Portunidae). Ethology 1995;100:242-52.
72. tinbergen N. Curious naturalists. Harmondsworth: Penguin education; 1974.
73. cannicci S, Fratini S, Vannini M. Short-range homing in fiddler crabs (Ocypodidae, Genus Uca) : a homing mechanism not based on local visual landmarks. Ethology 1999;105:867-80.
74. Dall SRX, Houston aI, McNamara JM. The behavioural ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecol Lett 2004;7:734-9.
75. Mather JA, anderson RC. Personalities of octoposuses (Octopus rubescens). J Comp Psychol 1993;107:336-40.
76. Wilson DS, coleman K, clark AB, Biederman L. Shy-bold continuum in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus) : an ecological study of a psychological trait. J Comp Psychol 1993;107:250-60.
77. Briffa M, rundle SD, Fryer a. comparing the strength of behavioural plasticity and consistency across situations: animal personalities in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus. Proc Roy Soc B 2008;275:1305-11.
78. Gosling S. From mice to men: what we can learn about personality from animal research? Psychol Bull 2001;127:45-86.
79. European Union. council Directive 86/609/eec of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Official Journal L 358, 18/12/1986 p. 1-28.
80. Zutphen van B. Legislation of animal use - developments in europe. AATEX 2008;14:805-9.
81. European Food Safety authority. Opinion on the "aspects of the biology and welfare of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes". adopted by the aHaW. Panel on 14 November 2005. EFSA J 2005;292:1-46. (http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab-animals/ scientific-en.htm).