Effectiveness of long-term residential substance abuse treatment for women: Findings from three national studies

American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 537-550

  Greenfield, Lawrence ^a,c   Burgdorf, Kenneth ^a   Chen, Xiaowu ^a   Porowski, Allan ^a   Roberts, Tracy ^a   Herrell, James ^b  

^a ICF INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b Center for Substance Abuse Treatment   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Posttreatment abstinence; Residential substance abuse treatment

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ADULT; ALCOHOL ABSTINENCE; ALCOHOL ABUSE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LENGTH OF STAY; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; RESIDENTIAL CARE; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; LENGTH OF STAY; LONG-TERM CARE; MOTHERS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PREGNANCY; STATISTICS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TEMPERANCE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 7244252886     PISSN: 00952990     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/ADA-200032290     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Clark W. Residential substance abuse treatment for pregnant and postpartum women and their children: treatment and policy implications. Child Welfare 2001; 80(2):179-198.
2. Finkelstein N. Treatment issues for alcohol- and drug-dependent pregnant and parenting women. Health Soc Work 1994; 19(1):7-15.
3. National Opinion Research Center (NORC). Final Report: National Treatment Improvement Evaluation Study. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, 1997.
4. Gerstein DR, Johnson RA. Nonresponse and selection bias in treatment follow-up studies. Subst Use Misuse 2000a; 35(6), Special Issue: Methodological.
5. Gerstein DR, Johnson RA. Characteristics, services, and outcomes of treatment for women. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 2000b; 22(4):325-338.
6. Flynn PM, Craddock G, Hubbard RL, Anderson J, Etheridge R. Methodological overview and research design for the drug abuse treatment outcomes study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav 1997; 11(4):230-243.
7. Grella CE, Joshi V, Hser Y. Program variation in treatment outcomes among women in residential drug treatment. Eval Rev 2000; 24(4):364-383.
8. Hubbard RL, Craddock GS, Flynn PM, Anderson J, Etheridge RM. Overview of 1-year follow-up outcomes in the drug abuse treatment outcome study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav 1997; 11(4):261-278.
9. Simpson DD, Joe GW, Brown BS. Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the drug abuse treatment outcome study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav 1997; 11(4):294-307.
10. Chavkin W, Breibart V, Elman D, Wise PH. National survey of the states: policies and practices regarding drug-using pregnant women. Am J Public Health 1998; 88(1):117-119.
11. Hubbard RL, Marsden ME, Rachal JV, Harwood HJ, Cavanaugh ER, Ginzburg HM. Clients in the major modalities. In: Hubbard RL, Marsden ME, Rachal JV, Harwood HJ, Cavanaugh ER, Ginzburg HM, eds. Drug Abuse Treatment: National Study of Effectiveness. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1989;71-98.
12. Simpson DD, Sells SB. Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse: an overview of the DARP research program. Adv Alcohol Subst Abuse 1982; 2(1):7-29.
13. Laudet A, Magura S, Whitney S. Effectiveness of intensive services for substance-using women with cocaine-exposed infants. In: Problems of Drug Dependence, 1997; NIDA Research Monograph No. 178. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1998:126.
14. Messina N, Wish E, Nemes S. Predictors of treatment outcomes in men and women admitted to a therapeutic community. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2000; 26(2):207-227.
15. Zar JH. Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984.