Value of the clinical history for different users of dermoscopy compared with results of digital image analysis

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 665-669

  Blum, A ^a   Hofmann Wellenhof, R ^b   Luedtke, H ^a   Ellwanger, U ^a   Steins, A ^a   Roehm, S ^a   Garbe, C ^a   Soyer, H P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Automated image analysis; Dermatoscopy; Dermoscopy; Digital image; Melanoma

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ANAMNESIS; ANGIOMA; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BENIGN TUMOR; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EPILUMINESCENCE MICROSCOPY; EPITHELIUM TUMOR; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MELANOCYTE; MELANOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEBORRHEIC KERATOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN HEMANGIOMA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DERMATOLOGY; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MICROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; NEVUS, PIGMENTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 7244229795     PISSN: 09269959     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2004.01044.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Mayer J. Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of dermatoscopy in detecting malignant melanoma. Med J Aust 1997; 167: 206-210.
2. Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol 2002; 3: 159-165.
3. Binder M, Puespoeck Schwarz M et al. Epiluminescence microscopy of small pigmented skin lesions: short-term formal training improves the diagnostic performance of dermatologists. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 36: 197-202.
4. Kittler H, Seltenheim M, Dawid M et al. Morphologic changes of pigmented skin lesions. A useful extension of the ABCD rule for dermatoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 40: 558-562.
5. Menzies SW. Automated epiluminescence microscopy. Human vs machine in the diagnosis of melanoma. Arch Dermatol 1999; 135 1538-1540.
6. Ganster H, Pinz A, Rohrer R et al. Automated melanoma recognition. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20: 233-239.
7. Dreiseitl S, Ohno-Machado L, Kittler H et al. A comparison of machine learning methods for the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions. Biomed Inform 2001; 34: 28-36.
8. Piccolo D, Smolle J, Wolf IH et al. 'Face-to-face' versus remote diagnosis of pigmented skin tumors: a teledermoscopic study. Arch Dermatol 1999; 135: 1467-1471.
9. Piccolo D, Smolle J, Argenziano G et al. Teledermoscopy-results of a multicentre study on 43 pigmented skin lesions. J Telemed Telecare 2000; 6: 132-137.
10. Eedy DJ, Wootton R. Teledermatology: a review. Br J Dermatol 2001; 144: 696-707.
11. Blum A, Ellwanger U, Lüdtke H, Garbe C. Digital image analysis of pigmented lesions: the Tübinger Mole Analyser. Skin Res Technol 1999; 5: 127.
12. Elbaum M, Kopf AW, Rabinovitz HS et al. Automatic differentiation of melanoma from melanocytic nevi with multispectral digital dermoscopy: a feasibility study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 44: 207-218.
13. Bauer J, Metzler G, Rassner G et al. Dermatoscopy turns histopathologist's attention to the suspicious area in melanocytic lesions. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137: 1338-1340.
14. Binder M, Kittler H, Dreiseitl S et al. Computer-aided epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions: the value of clinical data for the classification process. Melanoma Res 2000; 10: 556-561.
15. Menzies SW, Gutenev A, Avramidis M et al. Short-term digital surface microscopic monitoring of atypical or changing melanocytic lesions. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137: 1583-1589.
16. Kittler H, Binder M. Risks and benefits of sequential imaging of melanocytic skin lesions in patients with multiple atypical nevi. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137: 1590-1595.
17. Braun RP, Calza AM, Krischer J, Saurat JH. The use of digital dermoscopy for the follow-up of congenital nevi: a pilot study. Pediatr Dermatol 2001; 18: 277-281.
18. Williams T, May C, Esmail A et al. Patient satisfaction with store-and-forward teledermatology. J Telemed Telecare 2001; 7: 45-46.
19. Aas I, Monrad H. Learning in organizations working with telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2002; 8: 107-111.
20. Jacklin P, Roberts J. Social cost-benefit analysis of teledermatology. Costs were understated. Br Med J 2000; 321: 896-897.
21. Loane MA, Oakley A, Rademaker M et al. A cost-minimization analysis of the societal costs of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional care: results from a randomized controlled trial in New Zealand. J Telemed Telecare 2001; 7: 233-238.
22. Loane M, Wootton RA. Review of guidelines and standards for telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2002; 8: 63-71.