Solar wind coupling to and predictability of ground magnetic fields and their time derivatives

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Volumn 108, Issue A7, 2003, Pages

  Weigel, R S ^a,c   Klimas, A J ^a   Vassiliadis, D ^a,b  

^a NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITIES SPACE RESEARCH ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Fluctuations; Geomagnetic fields; Geomagnetically induced currents; Predictability; Solar wind driving

Indexed keywords

EID: 7244224117     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21699402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2002JA009627     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Akasofu, S. I., Inter-planetary energy flux associated with magnetospheric substorms, Planet Space Sci., 27, 425-431, 1979.
2. Allen, J., and H. Kroehl, Spatial and temporal distributions of magnetic effects of auroral electrojets as derived from ae-indices, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 3667-3677, 1975.
3. Aoki, T., Influence of dipole tilt angle on development of auroral electrojets, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 29, 441-453, 1977.
4. Baker, D., Statistical analyses in the study of solar wind-magnetosphere coupling, in Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Coupling, edited by Y. Kamide, and J. Slavin, pp. 17-38, Kluwer Acad., Norwell, Mass., 1986.
5. Bargatze, L. F., D. N. Baker, R. L. McPherron, and E. W. Hones, Magnetospheric impulse-response for many levels of geomagnetic activity, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 6387-6394, 1985.
6. Bishop, C., Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1995.
7. Boteler, D., R. Pirjola, and L. Trichtchenko, On calculating the electric and magnetic fields produced in technological systems at the earth's surface bya "wide" electrojet, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 62, 1311-1315, 2000.
8. Box, G., and G. Jenkins, Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, Holden-Day, Boca Raton, Fla., 1976.
9. Clauer, C. R., and Y. Kamide, Dp-1 and dp-2 current systems for the March 22, 1979 substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 1343-1354, 1985.
10. Clauer, C. R., R. L. McPherron, C. Searls, and M. G. Kivelson, Solar wind control of auroral-zone geomagnetic-activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 8, 915-918, 1981.
11. Cybenko, G., Approximation by superpositions of sigmoidal function, Math. Control Signals Syst., 2, 303-314, 1989.
12. Detman, T., and D. Vassiliadis, Review of techniques for magnetic storm forecasting, in Magnetic Storms, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol. 98, AGU, Washington, D. C., 1997.
13. Fedder, J., S. Slinker, J. Lyon, and R. Elphinstone, Global numerical-simulation of the growth-phase and the expansion onset for a substorm observed by Viking, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 19,083-19,093, 1995.
14. Gavrishchaka, V., and S. Ganguli, Optimization of the neural-network geomagnetic model for forecasting large-amplitude substorm events, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 6247-6257, 2001.
15. Gleisner, H., and H. Lundstedt, Response of the auroral electrojets to the solar wind modeled with neural networks, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 14,269-14,278, 1997.
16. Gleisner, H., and II. Lundstedt, Auroral electrojet predictions with dynamic neural networks, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 24,541-24,549, 2001.
17. Gonzalez, W. D., and A. L. C. Gonzalez, Energy-transfer by magnetopause reconnection and the substorm parameter-epsilon, Planet Space Sci., 32, 1007-1012, 1984.
18. Heppner, J. P., and N. C. Maynard, Empirical high-latitude electric-field models, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 4467-4489, 1987.
19. Horton, W., and I. Doxas, A low-dimension energy-conserving state space model for substorm dynamics, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 27, 223-27, 237, 1996.
20. Horton, W., and I. Doxas, A low-dimensional dynamical model for the solar wind driven geotail-ionosphere system, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 4561-4572, 1998.
21. Kamide, Y., and W. Baumjohann, Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling, Physics and Chemistry in Space, vol. 23, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993.
22. Kelly, T., N. Crooker, G. Siscoe, C. Russell, and E. Smith, On the use of a sunward Iibration-point-orbiting spacecraft as an interplanetary magneticfield monitor for magnetospheric studies, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 5629-5636, 1986.
23. Klimas, A. J., D. N. Baker, D. A. Roberts, D. H. Fairfield, and J. Buchner, A nonlinear dynamic analog model of geomagnetic-activity, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 12,253-12,266, 1992.
24. Klimas, A. J., D. N. Baker, D. Vassiliadis, and D. A. Roberts, Substorm recurrence during steady and variable solar wind driving-Evidence for a normal-mode in the unloading dynamics of the magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 14,855-14,861, 1994.
25. Klimas, A., D. Vassiliadis, D. Baker, and D. Roberts, The organized nonlinear dynamics of the magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 13,089-13,113, 1996.
26. Klimas, A. J., D. Vassiliadis, and D. N. Baker, Data-derived analogues of the magnetospheric dynamics, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 26,993-27,009, 1997.
27. Klimas, A., D. Vassiliadis, D. Baker, and J. Valdivia, Data-derived analogues of the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction, Phys. Chem. Earth, Part C, 24, 37-44, 1999.
28. Lee, L., and J. Olson, Kelvin-helmholtz instability and the variation of geomagnetic pulsation activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 7, 777-780, 1980.
29. Luhr, H., A. Aylward, S. Bücher, A. Pajunpaa, K. Panjunpaa, T. Holmboe, and S. Zalewski, Westward moving dynamic substorm features observed with the image magnetometer network and other ground-based instruments, Ann. Geophys., 16, 425-440, 1998.
30. McComas, D., S. Bame, P. Barker, W. Feldman, J. Phillips, P. Riley, and J. Griffee, Solar wind electron proton alpha monitor (SWEPAM) for the advanced composition explorer, Space Sci Rev., 86, 563-612, 1998.
31. Murayama, T., T. Aoki, H. Nakai, and K. Hakamada, Empirical-formula to relate the auroral electrojet intensity with inter-planetary parameters, Planet Space Sci, 28, 803-813, 1980.
32. O'Brien, T. P., and R. L. McPherron, Evidence against an independent solar wind density driver of the terrestrial ring current, Geophys. Res. Lett, 27, 3797-3799, 2000.
33. Papitashvili, V., B. Belov, D. Faermark, Y. Feldstein, S. Golyshev, L. Gromova, and A. Levitin, Electric-potential patterns in the northern and southern polar regions parameterized by the interplanetary magneticfield, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 13,251-13,262, 1994.
34. Papitashvili, V., C. Clauer, T. Killeen, B. Belov, S. Golyshev, and A. Levitin, Linear modeling of ionospheric electrodynamics from the IMF and solar wind data: Application for space weather forecast, Adv. Space Res., 22, 113-116, 1998.
35. Pirjola, R., and A. Viljanen, Complex image method for calculating electric and magnetic fields produced by an auroral electrojet of finite length, Ann. Geophys., 16, 1434-1444, 1998.
36. Richmond, A. D., and Y. Kamide, Mapping electrodynamic features of the high-latitude ionosphere from localized observations-Technique, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 5741-5759, 1988.
37. Ridley, A. J., G. Crowley, and C. Freitas, An empirical model of the ionospheric electric potential, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3675-3678, 2000.
38. Rostoker, G., and F. Pascal, Dependence of the response of the magnetosphere ionosphere current systems on the preconditioning of the auroral oval and on the level of the solar terrestrial interaction, Can. J. Phys., 68, 74-80, 1990.
39. Shue, J. H., and Y. Kamide, Effects of solar wind density on auroral electrojets, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 2181-2184, 2001.
40. Smith, C., J. L'Heureux, N. Ness, M. Acuna, L. Burlaga, and J. Scheifele, The ACE magnetic fields experiment, Space Sei. Rev., 86, 613-632, 1988.
41. Southwood, D., Hydromagnetic stability of magnetospheric boundary, Planet Space Sci, 16, 587, 1968.
42. Takalo, J., and J. Timonen, Neural network prediction of AE data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 2403-2406, 1997.
43. y dependencies of the polar-cap auroral distribution for northward IMF orientation inferred from observations at vostok station, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 56, 237-244, 1994.
44. Troshichev, O., and N. Voloshinov, Effects of magnetic activity and interplanetary magnetic-field on the position of radioaurorae in the southern polar-region, Planet Space Sci., 36, 441-448, 1988.
45. Troshichev, O., A. Kotikov, B. Bolotinskaya, and V. Andrezen, Influence of the IMF azimuthal component on magnetospheric substorm dynamics, J. Geomagn. Geoelectn, 38, 1075-1088, 1986.
46. Valdivia, J., D. Vassiliadis, A. Klimas, and A. Sharma, Modeling the spatial structure of the high latitude magnetic perturbations and the related current systems, Phys. Plasmas, 6, 4185-4194, 1999.
47. Vassiliadis, D., A. Klimas, D. Baker, and D. Roberts, A description of the solar wind magnetosphere coupling based on nonlinear filters, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 3495-3512, 1995.
48. Vasyliunas, V. M., J. R. Kan, G. L. Siscoe, and S. I. Akasofu, Scaling relations governing magnetospheric energy-transfer, Planet Space Sci., 30, 359-365, 1982.
49. Vennerstrom, S., Dayside magnetic ulf power at high latitudes: A possible long-term proxy for the solar wind velocity?, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 10,145-10,157, 1999.
50. Vennerstrom, S., and E. Friis-Christensen, On the role of IMF by in generating the electric-field responsible for the flow across the polar-cap, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 195-202, 1987.
51. Vennerstram, S., E. Friis-Christensen, O. Troshichev, and V. Andresen, Comparison between the polar-cap index, PC, and the auroral electrojet indexes AE, AL, and AU, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 101-113, 1991.
52. Weigel, R., W. Horton, T. Tajima, and T. Detman, Forecasting auroral electrojet activity from solar wind input with neural networks, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 1353-1356, 1999.
53. Weigel, R. S., D. Vassiliadis, and A. Klimas, Coupling of the solar wind to temporal fluctuations in ground magnetic fields, Geophys. Res. Lett, 29(X9), 1915, doi:10.1029/2002GL014740, 2002.
54. Weimer, D., Models of high-latitude electric potentials derived with a least error fit of spherical harmonic coefficients, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 19,595-19,607, 1995.
55. Weimer, D., A flexible, IMF dependent model of high-latitude electric potentials having "space weather" applications, Geophys. Res. Lett, 23, 2549-2552, 1996.
56. Winglee, R., V. Papitashvili, and D. Weimer, Comparison of the highlatitude ionospheric electrodynamics inferred from global simulations and semiempirical models for the January 1992 GEM campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 26,961-26,977, 1997.
57. Wu, J. G., and H. Lundstedt, Neural network modeling of solar wind magnetosphere interaction, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 14,457-14,466, 1997.