Intergroup threat and intragroup interdependence: Multiplicity of psychological processes behind ingroup favoritism, and their distinct elicitors

Japanese Journal of Psychology

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 246-251

  Yokota, Kunihiro ^a   Yuki, Masaki ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Intergroup discrimination; Intergroup threat; Intragroup interdependence; Minimal group paradigm; Social identity theory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MOTIVATION;

FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MOTIVATION;

EID: 72349099273     PISSN: 00215236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.80.246     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
2. Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429-444.
3. Brewer, M. B., Weber, J. G., & Carini, B. (1995). Person memory in intergroup contexts: Categorization versus individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 29-40.
4. Dobbs, M, & Crano, W. D. (2001). Outgroup accountability in the minimal group paradigm: Implications for aversive discrimination and social identity theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 355-364.
5. Gaertner, L., & Insko, C. A. (2000). Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation, or fear? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 77-94.
6. Gagnon, A., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1996). Discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Social identity or self-interest? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1289-1301.
7. Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604.
8. (Jin, N., Yamagishi, T., & Kiyonari, T. (1996). Bilateral dependency and the minimal group paradigm. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 67, 77-85.)
9. (Kameda, T., & Murata, K. (2000). Social psychology from the complex system perspective: Humans as Adaptive Agents. Tokyo: Yuhikaku)
10. Karp, D. R., Jin, N., Yamagishi, T., & Shinotsuka, H. (1993). Rising the minimum in the minimal group paradigm. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 231-240.
11. (Kiyonari, T. (2002). Expectations of a generalized excahnge system and ingroup favoritism: An experimental study of bounded reciprocity. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 73, 1-9.)
12. (Kohguch, H., Sakata, K., & Fujimoto, K. (2007). The effects of leadership and prototypicality on group member's morale and leader perception. Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 245-257.)
13. Kurzban, R., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Managing ingroup and outgroup relationships. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology. New York: Wiley, pp. 653-675.
14. Rabbie, J. M., Schot, J. C, & Visser, L. (1989). Social identity theory: A conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioural interaction model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 171-202.
15. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers cave experiment. Norman, OK: Institute of Group Relations.
16. Stroebe, K., Lodewijkx, H. F. M., & Spears, R. (2005). Do unto others as they do unto you: Reciprocity andsocial identification as determinants of ingroup favoritism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 831-845.
17. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorisation and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
18. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole. pp. 33-48.
19. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley & Suns.
20. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1988). The evolution of war and its cognitive foundations. Institute (Institute for Evolutionary Studies Technical Report 88-1).(http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/papers/Evolofwar.pdf) (October 6, 2007)
21. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 19-136.
22. Yamagishi, T., Jin, N., & Kiyonari, T. (1999). Bounded generalized reciprocity: Ingroup favoritism and ingroup boasting. Advances in Group Processes, 16, 161-197.
23. Yamagishi, T., & Kiyonari, T. (2000). The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 116-132.
24. Yuki, M., & Yokota, K. (2009). The primal warrior: Outgroup threat priming enhances intergroup discrimination in men but not women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 271-274.