TPACK: Where do we go now?

TechTrends

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 46-47

  Polly, Drew ^a   Dias, Laurie Brantley ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 72249115642     PISSN: 87563894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11528-009-0324-4     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barbour, M., Rieber, L. P., Thomas, G., & Rauscher, D. (2009). Homemade Power-Point games: A constructionist alternative to WebQuests. TechTrends 53(5),.
2. Buck Institute for Education (2002). Teaching with technology: A statewide professional development program. Retrieved November 12, 2005, from http://www. bie. org/files/twtfinal. pdf.
3. Cox, S. & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. Tech-Trends 53(5), 60-69.
4. Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St. Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). TPACK Development in Science Teaching: Measuring the TPACK Confidence of Inservice Science Teachers. TechTrends 53(5), 70-79.
5. Hall, G. E., Loucks, S. F., Rutherford, W. L., & Newlove, W. (1975). Levels of use of the innovation: A framework for analyzing innovation adoption. Journal of Teacher Education, 26, 5-9.
6. Mishra, P. & Koelher, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
7. Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Kereluik, K. (2009). The Song Remains the Same: Looking Back to the Future of Educational Technology. TechTrends 53(5), 48-53.
8. Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of Technology Implementation (LoTi): A framework for measuring Classroom Technology Use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(3), 40-42.
9. Mullens, J. (1998). Validating teacher responses on instructional practice self-report surveys. Prepared for the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management Research Conference, New York. Retrieved January 12, 2005, from http://www. amstat. org/sections/SRMS/Proceedings/papers/1999_118. pdf.
10. Nelson, J., Christopher, A., Mims, C. (2009). TPACK and Web 2. 0: Transformation of Teaching and Learning. TechTrends 53(5), 80-85.
11. Newhouse, C. P. (2001). Applying the concernsbased adoption model to research on computers in classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 33(5).
12. Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523.
13. Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Shafer, K. G., Driskell, S. O., Harper S. R., Johnston, C., Browning, C., Özgün-Koca, S. A., & Kersaint, G. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 9(1).
14. Retrieved May 18, 2009 from http://www. citejournal. org/vol9/iss1/mathematics/article1. cfm.
15. Polly, D., & Mims, C. (in press). Supporting the integration of Web 2. 0 technologies in professional development programs. In T. Kidd & I. Chen (Eds.), Wired for learning: An educators guide to Web 2. 0. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
16. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.