Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: A Cost-effective Approach

Urology

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 92-95

  Ye, Jianfei ^a   Huang, Yi ^a   Hou, Xiaofei ^a   Zhao, Lei ^a   Wang, Guoliang ^a   Tian, Xiaojun ^a   Tang, Wenhao ^a   Fu, Yan ^a   Ma, Lulin ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY THIRD HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CREATININE; PETHIDINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY DONOR; LIVING DONOR; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RETROPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC LIVE DONOR NEPHRECTOMY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETER FISTULA; URETER SURGERY;

ADULT; AGED; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; RETROPERITONEAL SPACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 72249111116     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.07.1238     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ratner L.E., Hiller J., Sroka M., et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy removes disincentives to live donation. Transplant Proc 29 (1997) 3402-3403
2. Simforoosh N., Basiri A., Tabibi A., et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 95 (2005) 851-855
3. Gill I.S., Uzzo R.G., Hobart M.G., et al. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal live donor right nephrectomy for purposes of allotransplantation and autotransplantation. J Urol 164 (2000) 1500-1504
4. Ng C.S., Abreu S.C., Gill I.S., et al. Right retroperitoneal versus left transperitoneal laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urology 63 (2004) 857-861
5. Ruszat R., Sulser T., Dickenmann M., et al. Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy: donor outcome and complication rate in comparison with three different techniques. World J Urol 24 (2006) 113-117
6. Lei Z., Lulin M., Guoliang W., et al. Ensuring the safety of living kidney donors and recipients in China through ethics committee oversight: an early experience. Am J Transplant 8 (2008) 1765-1766
7. Kok N.F., Adang E.M., Hansson B.M., et al. Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus mini-incision open donor nephrectomy: a randomized study. Transplantation 83 (2007) 1582-1587
8. Sulser T., Bachmann A., Langer I., et al. Retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy-Feasible on both sides. Eur Urol Suppl 1 (2003) 9
9. Fisher P.C., Montgomery J.S., Johnston W.K., et al. 200 Consecutive hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies: evolution of operative technique and outcomes. J Urol 175 (2006) 1439-1443
10. Gill I.S., Kavoussi L.R., Clayman R.V., et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients: a multi-institutional review. J Urol 154 (1995) 479-483
11. Kumar A., Chaudhary H., Srivastava A., et al. Laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: modifications for developing nations. BJU Int 93 (2004) 1291-1295
12. Wright A.D., Will T.A., Holt D.R., et al. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a look at current trends and practice patterns at major transplant centers across the United States. J Urol 179 (2008) 1488-1492
13. Jellison F.C., Shah S.K., Mashni Jr. J.W., et al. Vessel length following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: impact of vascular ligation technique on allograft vessel length. J Endourol 22 (2008) 973-977
14. Tanabe K., Miyamoto N., and Ishida H. Retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN): establishment and initial experience of RPLDN at a single center. Am J Transplant 5 (2005) 739-745
15. Srivastava A., Kumar A., Dubey D., et al. Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: results from a prospective randomized trial. J Endourol 20 (2006) A39-A39
16. Ruiz-Deya G., Cheng S., Palmer E., et al. Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison of outcomes. J Urol 166 (2001) 1270-1274