Why reduced-form regression models of health effects versus exposures should not replace QRA: Livestock production and infant mortality as an example

Risk Analysis

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1664-1671

  Cox Jr , Louis Anthony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal feeding operations; Causal analysis; Health risk analysis; Infant mortality rates; Spurious regression

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS; ANIMAL TYPES; CATTLE PRODUCTION; CAUSAL ANALYSIS; CAUSAL RELATIONS; DOSE-RESPONSE MODELING; EXPLANATORY VARIABLES; EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT; FATE AND TRANSPORT MODELING; HEALTH EFFECTS; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT MORTALITY RATES; LIVESTOCK OPERATIONS; LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION; MANAGEMENT POLICY; MODEL SPECIFICATIONS; POLLUTION EMISSIONS; PUBLIC HEALTH RISKS; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT; REGRESSION MODEL; SPECIFIC COMPONENT; STANDARD METHOD; VARIABLE SELECTION; WEIGHTED SUM;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMALS; FEEDING; HEALTH; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFETY FACTOR; TELEMEDICINE;

HEALTH RISKS;

HEALTH RISK; INFANT MORTALITY; LIVESTOCK FARMING; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

AIR POLLUTION; ARTICLE; CATTLE; HUMAN; INFANT; INFANT MORTALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVESTOCK; NONHUMAN; POULTRY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; SWINE;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, DOMESTIC; CATTLE; CAUSALITY; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POULTRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SUS SCROFA;

UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; BOS; SUIDAE;

EID: 72249104666     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01303.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Sneeringer S. Does animal feeding operation pollution hurt public health? A national longitudinal study of health externalities identified by geographic shifts in livestock production. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2009 91 (1 124 137.
2. Jacobs RL, Leamer EE, Ward MP. Difficulties with testing for causation. Economic Inquiry, 1979 17 (3 401 413.
3. Cox LA Jr. Some limitations of a proposed linear model for antimicrobial risk management. Risk Analysis, 2005 25 (6 1327 1332.
4. Biggs D, de Ville B, Suen E. A method of choosing multiway partitions for classification and decision trees. Journal of Applied Statistics, 1991 18 (1 49 62.
5. Brodkin CA, Balmes JR, Redlich CA, Cullen MR. Residential proximity to naturally occurring asbestos: Health risk or ecologic fallacy American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2006 173 (5 573.
6. Kwok RK, Yankaskas BC. The use of census data for determining race and education as SES indicators: A validation study. Annals of Epidemiology, 2001 11 (3 171 177.
7. Selvin S, Merrill D, Wong L, Sacks ST. Ecologic regression analysis and the study of the influence of air quality on mortality. Environmental Health Perspectives, 1984 54 : 333 340.
8. Cui Y, Zhang ZF, Froines J, Zhao J, Wang H, Yu SZ, Detels R. Air pollution and case fatality of SARS in the People's Republic of China: An ecologic study. Environmental Health, 2003 2 (1 15.
9. Wakefield J. Multi-level modelling, the ecologic fallacy, and hybrid study designs. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2009 38 (2 330 336.
10. Greenland S. Ecologic versus individual-level sources of bias in ecologic estimates of contextual health effects. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2001 30 (6 1343 1350.
11. Chen W-D. Testing for spurious regression in a panel data model with the individual number and time length growing. Journal of Applied Statistics, 2006 33 (8 759 772.
12. Christenfeld NJ, Sloan RP, Carroll D, Greenland S. Risk factors, confounding, and the illusion of statistical control. Psychosomatic Medicine, 2004 66 (6 868 875.
13. Fewell Z, Davey Smith G, Sterne JA. The impact of residual and unmeasured confounding in epidemiologic studies: A simulation study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2007 166 (6 PubMed 646 655.
14. Shipley B. Cause and Correlation in Biology. A User's Guide to Path Analysis, Structural Equations and Causal Inference. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2000. http://callisto.si.usherb.ca:8080/bshipley/my%20book. htm.
15. Greenland S, Brumback B. An overview of relations among causal modeling methods. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2002 31 (5 1030 1037.
16. Ellis B, Wong WH. Learning causal Bayesian network structures from experimental data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2008 103 (482 778 789.
17. Shih J-S, Burtraw D, Palmer K, Siikamäki J. Air emissions of ammonia and methane from livestock operations: Valuation and policy options. Resources for the Future. Discussion Paper. Washington, DC. http://www.rff.org/Documents/ RFF-DP-06-11.pdf, 2006.
18. Lucas R. Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1976 1 : 19 46.