The empirical analysis of strategic change and origin of top management successor

International Research Journal of Finance and Economics

Volumn 34, Issue , 2009, Pages 217-226

  Wen, Lei ^a  

^a BUENA VISTA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Financial performance; Managerial succession; Successor type

Indexed keywords

EID: 72249095047     PISSN: 14502887     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barber, Brad M. and John D. Lyon, 1996, Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics, Journal of Financial Economics 41, 359-399.
2. Boeker, Warren. 1997. Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of Management Journal 40, 152-170.
3. Brady, G., and Helmich, D. 1984. Executive succession. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
4. Denis, David J. and Diane K. Denis, 1995. Firm performance changes following top management dismissals, Journal of Finance, 50, 1029-1057.
5. Fondas, N., Wiersema, M., 1997. Changing of the guard: The influence of CEO socialization on strategic change. Journal of Management Studies 34, 561-585.
6. Fredrickson, J. W., Hambrick, D. C., & Baumrin, S. 1988. A model of CEO turnover. Academy of Management Review 13, 255-270.
7. Gabarro, J. J. 1987. The dynamics of taking charge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
8. Harvey, C., 2006. Campbell R. Harvey's Hypertextual Finance Glossary. http://www.duke.edu/~charvey/Classes/wpg/bfglosz.htm
9. Hotchkiss, Edith Shwalb, 1995. Postbankruptcy performance and management turnover, Journal of Finance 50, 3-21
10. Huson, M., and Malatesta P. and Parrino, R., 2004. Managerial Succession and Firm Performance. Forthcoming, Journal of Financial Economics
11. Kesner, I.F., & Dalton, D.R. 1994. Top management turnover and CEO succession: an investigation of the effects of turnover on performance. Journal of Management Studies, 31: 701-713.
12. Kesner, I. F., and Sebora, T. C. 1994. Executive succession: Past, present & future. Journal of Management, 20: 327-372.
13. Khorana, Ajay, 2001. Performance Changes following Top Management Turnover: Evidence from Open-End Mutual Funds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36, 371-393.
14. Kotter, J. P. 1982. The general managers. New York: Free Press.
15. Lucier, Chuck, Eric Spiegel, and Rob Schuyt, 2002. Why CEOs Fall: The Causes and Consequences of Turnover at the Top. Strategy+business. http://www.strategy-business.com
16. Miller, D., 1993. Some Organizational Consequences of CEO Succession. Academy of Management Journal 36, 645-659.
17. Reinganum, M. R., 1985. The effect of executive succession on stockholder wealth, Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 46-60.
18. Siegel, J., Shim, J., and Hartman, S., 1992. The McGraw-Hill Pocket Guide to Business Finance. 1992. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
19. Westphal, J. D., 1999. Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal 42, 7-24.
20. Wiersema, M. F., 1992. Strategic consequences of executive succession within diversified firms. Journal of Management Studies 29, 73-94.
21. Wiersema, M. F. 1995. Executive succession as an antecedent to corporate restructuring. Human Resource Management, 34: 185-202.
22. Wiersema, M. F., 2002. Holes at the Top: Why CEO Firings Backfire. Harvard Business Review 80, 70-78.
23. Zajac, E. J., 1990. CEO selection, succession, compensation and firm performance: A theoretical integration and empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal 11, 217-230.