Between historical heritage and policy learning: The reform of public research funding systems in poland, 1989-2007

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 697-708

  Jabłecka, Julita ^a   Lepori, Benedetto ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUGANO   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECENTRALIZATION; FINANCIAL SYSTEM; POST-COMMUNISM; PUBLIC SECTOR; REFORM PROCESS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

POLAND;

EID: 72249089569     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234209X475263     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Amsterdamski, S 1993. Perceptions of Dilemmas: Summary of a Qualitative Study. Vienna: Institute fur die Wissenschaften vom Menschen (TERC5).
2. Amsterdamski, S and J Jabłecka 1993. Higher Education and Research in Poland: the Inherited Situation and the Reforms. Vienna: Institute fur die Wissenschaften vom Menschen (TERC1).
3. Amsterdamski, S, I Białecki, E Chmielecka and J Jabłecka 1994. Report on the reform of higher education and research in Poland. Issues in Transition, Institute of Human Sciences, Vienna, TERC Program, 7, 13-36.
4. Argyris, C and D A Schon 1978. Organizational Learning: a Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
5. Arthur, W B 1989. Competing technologies increasing returns and lock in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99, 116-131.
6. Bonaccorsi, A 2007. Better institutions vs better policies in European science. Science and Public Policy, 34(5), June, 303-316.
7. Braun, D 2003. Lasting tensions in research policy making - a delegation problem, Science and Public Policy, 32(5), October, 309-321.
8. Braun, D and M Benninghoff 2003. Policy learning in Swiss research policy - the case of the national centres of competence in research. Research Policy, 32(10), 1849-1863.
9. Cohen, M, J March and J Olsen 1972. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, March, 1-25.
10. Collier, R B and D Collier 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11. Cox, R 2001. The social construction of an imperative: why welfare reform happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but not in Germany. World Politics, 53, 163-198.
12. David, D 1985. Clio and the economics of querty. American Economic Review, 75, 332-337.
13. Djelic, M and S Quack 2007. Overcoming path dependency -path generation in open systems. Theory and Society, 36(2), 161-186.
14. Dolowitz, D P and D Marsh 2000. Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy making. Governance, 13(1), 5-24.
15. Findeisen, W 1993. Założenia do aktów prawnych dotycza{ogonek}cych nauki, szkolnictwa wyższego i działalności badawczo- rozwo-jowej (opracowanie z grudnia 1989). Nauka Polska, Jej Potr-zeby Organizacja I Rozwój, 2 (XXVIII). Warszawa, Fundacja Popierania Nauki.
16. Goldstein, J and R Keohane 1993. Ideas and foreign policy: an analytical framework. In Ideas and Foreign Policy, eds. J Goldstein and R Keohane. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17. Greener, I 2002: Understanding NHS reform: the policy transfer, social learning and path dependency perspectives. Governance, 15(2), 161-183.
18. Hall, P 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: the case of economic policy making in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275-296.
19. Hall, P and R Taylor 1996. Political science and the three institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 936-957.
20. Heclo, H 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: from Relief to Income. New Haven: Yale University Press.
21. Jabłecka, J 1992. System grantów czyli konfrontacja założeń z realiami. Sprawy Nauki, 6, 3-10.
22. Jabłecka, J 1995. The changes of the management and financing of the research system in Poland. Social Studies of Science, 4, special issue, 727-753.
23. James, O and M Lodge 2003. The limitations of policy transfer and lesson drawing for public policy research. Political Studies Review, 1, 179-193.
24. Kingdon, J 2003. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York/San Francisco/Boston: Longman.
25. Lepori, B, J Masso, J Jabłecka, K Sima and K Ukrainski 2009. Comparing the organization of public research funding in Central and Eastern European countries. Science and Public Policy, this issue.
26. Mahoney, J 2000. Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507-548.
27. Małkowski, S 1992. Postulaty z dziedziny nauki. Nauka Polska, Jej Potrzeby Organizacja I Rozwój, 1 (XXVII). Warszawa: Fundacja Popierania Nauki.
28. McCubbins, Mathew D, Roger G Noll and Barry R Weingast 1987. Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 3(2), 243-277.
29. North, D 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
30. OECD, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1995. Reviews of National Science and Technology Policy Poland, Part Two, Examiners Report.
31. Olsen, J P and B G Peters 1996. Lessons from Experience: Experiential Learning in Administrative Reforms in Eight Democracies. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
32. Peters, G 1995. Institutional Theory in Political Science: the 'New Institutionalism'. London: Continuum.
33. Pierson, P 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251-267.
34. Polanyi, M 1962. The republic of science, its political and economic theory. Minerva, Autumn, 54-73. Reprinted in Criteria for Scientific Development, Public Policy and National Goals, ed. E Shils. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1968.
35. Rose, R 1993. Lesson Drawing in Public Policy. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
36. Sabatier, P 1987. Knowledge, policy-oriented learning and policy change. Knowledge, Diffusion, Utilization, 8(4), 649-692.
37. Scott, R, P Mendel and C Caronna 2000. Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: from Professional Dominance to Managed Care. University of Chicago Press.
38. Smith, A 2002. Policy Transfer in the Development of UK Climate Policy for Business. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, Paper no. 75, January.
39. Stacey, J and B Ritterberger 2003. Dynamics of formal and informal institutional change. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(6), 858-873.
40. Stark, D and L Burszt 1992. One way or multiple paths for a comparative sociology of East European capitalism. American Journal of Sociology, 4, 1129-1137.
41. Steinmo, S, Kathleen Thelen and F Logstreth 1992. Structuring Politics: Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
42. Stone, D 2000. Learning Lessons, Policy Transfer and the International Diffusion of Ideas. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation.
43. Sydow, J and J Koch 2005. Organizational Paths: Path Dependency and Beyond. Free University of Berlin, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 21st EGOS Colloquium, 30 June-2 July, Berlin.
44. Thelen, K 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Sciences, 2, 369-404.
45. Thelen, K 2003. How institutions evolve: insights from comparative historical analysis. In Comparative Historical Analysis in Social Sciences, eds. J Mahoney and D Rueschemeyer. New York: Cambridge University Press.