|
Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 14-22
|
Against risk-benefit review of prisoner research
|
Author keywords
Coercion; Exploitation; IOM report; Prisoner; Research; Risk benefit; Undue inducement
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CHILD;
CHILD ADVOCACY;
CONFLICT;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS;
FREEDOM;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HEALTH CARE PLANNING;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
METHODOLOGY;
MOTIVATION;
ORGANIZATION;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
PATERNALISM;
PEER REVIEW;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PRISONER;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
RESEARCH ETHICS;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
UNITED STATES;
VULNERABLE POPULATION;
ADULT;
CHILD;
CHILD ADVOCACY;
CHOICE BEHAVIOR;
COERCION;
DISSENT AND DISPUTES;
ETHICS, RESEARCH;
FREEDOM;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;
HEALTH PLANNING GUIDELINES;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (U.S.);
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
MOTIVATION;
PATERNALISM;
PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH;
PRISONERS;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
UNITED STATES;
VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;
|
EID: 72249086624
PISSN: 02699702
EISSN: 14678519
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01775.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (10)
|