Erratum to Do a threatened native amphibian and its invasive congener differ in response to human alteration of the landscape? (Biol Invasions, 10.1007/s10530-009-9438-z);Do a threatened native amphibian and its invasive congener differ in response to human alteration of the landscape?

Biological Invasions

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 145-154

  D'Amore, Antonia ^a   Hemingway, Valentine ^b   Wasson, Kerstin ^a,b  

^a Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Anthropogenic change; Invasive species; Rana catesbeiana; Rana draytonii

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ECOHYDROLOGY; ENDANGERED SPECIES; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; FROG; GLOBAL WARMING; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HUMAN ACTIVITY; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; RANA AURORA DRAYTONII; RANA CATESBEIANA;

EID: 72149128153     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-009-9457-9     Document Type: Erratum

References (36)

1. Adams MJ (1999) Correlated factors in amphibian decline: exotic species and habitat change in western Washington. J Wildl Manage 63: 1162-1171. doi: 10. 2307/3802834.
2. Adams MJ, Pearl CA, Bury BR (2003) Indirect facilitation of an anuran invasion by non-native fishes. Ecol Lett 6: 343-351. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1461-0248. 2003. 00435. x.
3. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG et al (2002) Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 16: 909-923. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1523-1739. 2002. 00530. x.
4. Byers JE (2002) Impact of non-indigenous species on natives enhanced by anthropogenic alteration of selection regimes. Oikos 97: 449-458. doi: 10. 1034/j. 1600-0706. 2002. 970316. x.
5. Chapman MG, Underwood AJ (1999) Ecological patterns in multivariate assemblages: information and interpretation of negative values in ANOSIM tests. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 180: 257-265. doi: 10. 3354/meps180257.
6. Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18: 117-143. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1442-9993. 1993. tb00438. x.
7. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1994) Similarity-based testing for community pattern: the two-way layout with no replication. Mar Biol 118: 167-176. doi: 10. 1007/BF00699231.
8. Clavero M, Garcia-Berthou E (2005) Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 110. doi: 10. 1016/j. tree. 2005. 01. 003.
9. Davidson C (2004) Declining downwind: amphibian population declines in California and historical pesticide use. Ecol Appl 14: 1892-1902. doi: 10. 1890/03-5224.
10. Davies RG, Orme CDL, Olson V et al (2006) Human impacts and the global distribution of extinction risk. Proc Biol Sci 273: 2127. doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2006. 3551.
11. Debinski DM, Holt RD (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv Biol 14: 342-355. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1523-1739. 2000. 98081. x.
12. Didham RK, Tylianakis JM, Gemmell NJ et al (2007) Interactive effects of habitat modification and species invasion on native species decline. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 489. doi: 10. 1016/j. tree. 2007. 07. 001.
13. Doubledee RA, Muller EB, Nisbet RM (2003) Bullfrogs, disturbance regimes, and the persistence of California red-legged frogs. J Wildl Manage 67: 424-438.
14. Dukes JS, Mooney HA (1999) Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends Ecol Evol 14: 135. doi: 10. 1016/S0169-5347(98)01554-7.
15. Edinger EN, Jompa J, Limmon GV et al (1998) Reef degradation and coral biodiversity in Indonesia: Effects of land-based pollution, destructive fishing practices and changes over time. Mar Pollut Bull 36: 617. doi: 10. 1016/S0025-326X(98)00047-2.
16. Forman RTT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29: 207-231. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. ecolsys. 29. 1. 207.
17. Hayes MP, Jennings MR (1986) Decline of ranid frog species in western North America: are bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) responsible? J Herpetol 20: 490-509. doi: 10. 2307/1564246.
18. Hayes MP, Jennings MR (1988) Habitat correlates of distribution of the California red-legged frog (Rana aurora draytonii) and the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii): implications for management. In: Proceedings of the symposium on the management of amphibians, reptiles, and small mammals in North America. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-166.
19. Hobbs RJ (2001) Synergisms among habitat fragmentation, livestock grazing, and biotic invasions in southwestern Australia. Conserv Biol 15: 1522-1528. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1523-1739. 2001. 01092. x.
20. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 199. doi: 10. 1016/S0169-5347(01)02101-2.
21. Lawler SP, Dritz D, Strange T, Holyoak M (1999) Effects of introduced mosquitofish and bullfrogs on the threatened Calfornia red-legged frog. Conserv Biol 13: 613-622 doi: 10. 1046/j. 1523-1739. 1999. 98075. x.
22. Mandrillon A-L, Saglio P (2007) Herbicide exposure affects the chemical recognition of a non native predator in common toad tadpoles (Bufo bufo). Chemoecology 17: 31. doi: 10. 1007/s00049-006-0354-8.
23. Marsh DM, Trenham PC (2001) Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conserv Biol 15: 40-49. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1523-1739. 2001. 00129. x.
24. Marvier M, Kareiva P, Neubert MG (2004) Habitat destruction, fragmentation, and disturbance promote invasion by habitat generalists in a multispecies metapopulation. Risk Anal 24: 869-878. doi: 10. 1111/j. 0272-4332. 2004. 00485. x.
25. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.
26. Meador MR, Brown LR, Short T (2003) Relations between introduced fish and environmental conditions at large geographic scales. Ecol Indic 3: 81. doi: 10. 1016/S1470-160X(03)00013-X.
27. Meiners SJ (2005) Seed and seedling ecology of Acer saccharum and Acer platanoides: a contrast between native and exotic congeners. Northeast Nat 12: 23-32. doi: 10. 1656/1092-6194(2005)012[0023: SASEOA]2. 0. CO; 2.
28. Opdam P, Wascher D (2004) Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biol Conserv 117: 285. doi: 10. 1016/j. biocon. 2003. 12. 008.
29. Pellet J, Guisan A, Perrin N (2004) A concentric analysis of the impact of urbanization on the threatened European tree frog in an agricultural landscape. Conserv Biol 18: 1599-1606. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1523-1739. 2004. 0421a. x.
30. Richter BD, Braun DP, Mendelson MA et al (1997) Threats to imperiled freshwater fauna. Conserv Biol 11: 1081-1093. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1523-1739. 1997. 96236. x.
31. Rubbo MJ, Kiesecker JM (2005) Amphibian breeding distribution in an urbanized landscape. Conserv Biol 19: 504-511. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1523-1739. 2005. 000101. x.
32. Stebbins RC (1966) A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians; field marks of all species in western North America. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
33. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE et al (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427: 145. doi: 10. 1038/nature02121.
34. Trakhtenbrot A, Nathan R, Perry G et al (2005) The importance of long-distance dispersal in biodiversity conservation. Divers Distrib 11: 173-181. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1366-9516. 2005. 00156. x.
35. Vitousek PM, D'Antonio CM, Loope LL et al (1997) Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. N Z J Ecol 21: 1-16.
36. Wania F, Mackay D (1996) Tracking the distribution of persistent organic pollutants. Environ Sci Technol 30: 390-396.