Introduction economics and contemporary land use policy

Economics and Contemporary Land Use Policy: Development and Conservation at the Rural-Urban Fringe

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-17

  Johnston, Robert J ^a   Swallow, Stephen K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 72149123244     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781936331659     Document Type: Editorial

References (58)

1. Abdalla, C. W. (2001). Protecting Farmland at the Fringe: Do Regulations Work? Strengthening the Research Agenda. Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development Paper no. 7. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.
2. Abdalla, C. W. (2004). What the Public Values about Farm and Ranch Land: Workshop Summary. Regional Rural Development Paper no. 23. Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.
3. Albers, H. J., and A. W. Ando. (2003). Could State-Level Variation in the Number of Land Trusts Make Sense? Land Economics 79(3): 311-327.
4. American Farmland Trust.(1997). SavingAmericanFarmland:What Works. Northampton, MA: American Farmland Trust Publications Division.
5. American Planning Association. (2002). Planning for Smart Growth: 2002 State of the States. Chicago: American Planning Association.
6. Anderson, C. M., and J. R. King. (2004). Equilibrium Behavior in the Conservation Easement Game. Land Economics 80(3): 355-374.
7. Anderson, J. E. (1986). Property Taxes and the Timing of Urban Land Development. Regional Science and Urban Economics 16(4): 483-492.
8. Anderson, J. E. (1993). Use Value Property Tax Assessment: Effects on Land Development. Land Economics 69(3): 263-269.
9. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10. Anselin, L., R. Florax, and S. Rey (eds.). (2004). Advances in Spatial Econometrics. Methodology, Tools and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
11. Arendt, R., E. Brabec, H. Dodson, C. Reid, and R. Yaro. (1994). Rural by Design: Maintaining Small Town Character. Chicago: American Planning Association.
12. Beasley, S. D., W. G. Workman, and N. A. Williams. (1986). Estimating Amenity Values of Urban Fringe Farmland: A Contingent Valuation Approach. Growth and Change 17(1): 70-78.
13. Bentick, B. L. (1979). The Impact of Taxation and Valuation Practices on the Timing and Efficiency of Land Use. Journal of Political Economy 87(4): 859-868.
14. Bentick, B. L. (1997). The Economic Effects (Neutrality) of Taxes on Land. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 56(3): 369-371.
15. Bergstrom, J. C., B. L. Dillman, and J. R. Stoll. (1985). Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case of Prime Agricultural Land. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 17: 139-149.
16. Bills, N., C. Geisler, and A. Sokolow. (2004). Conservation Easements as Encumbered Ownership: Issues at Hand. Rural Development Paper no. 25. Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.
17. Bockstael, N. E. (1996). Modeling Economics and Ecology: The Importance of a Spatial Perspective. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 1168-1180.
18. Caldwell, Bruce J. (1982). Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. Boston: George Allen and Unwin.
19. Calthorpe, P. (1993). The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
20. Case, A. (1991). Spatial Patterns in Household Demand. Econometrica 59(4): 953-965.
21. Case, A. (1992). Neighborhood Influence and Technological Change. Regional Science and Urban Economics 22(3): 491-508.
22. Duke, J. M., and R. A. Hyde. (2002). Identifying Public Preferences for Land Preservation Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Ecological Economics 42(1-2): 131-145.
23. Feather, P., D. Hellerstein, and L. Hansen. (1999). Economic Valuation of Environmental Benefits and the Targeting of Conservation Programs: The Case of the CRP. Agricultural Economic Report no. 778. Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
24. Fischel, W. A. (1985). The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. Freeman, A. M., III. (2003). The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
26. Gardner, B. D. (1977). The Economics of Agricultural Land Preservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59(5): 1027-1036.
27. Garrod, G., and K. Willis. (1992).The Environmental Economic Impact of a Woodland: A Two-Stage Hedonic Price Model of the Amenity Value of Forestry in Britain. Applied Economics 24: 715-728.
28. Geoghegan, J., L. Lynch, and S. Bucholtz. (2003). Capitalization of Open Spaces into Housing Values and the Residential Property Tax Revenue Impacts of Agricultural Easement Programs. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 32(1): 33-45.
29. Gordon, P., and H. W. Richardson. (1998). Prove It: The Costs and Benefits of Sprawl. Brookings Review 16(4): 23.
30. Heimlich, R. E., and W. D. Anderson. (2001). Development at the Urban Fringe and Beyond: Impacts on Agriculture and Rural Land. Agricultural Economic Report no. 803. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
31. Irwin, E. G., and N. E. Bockstael. (2002). Interacting Agents, Spatial Externalities, and the Evolution of Residential Land Use Patterns. Journal of Economic Geography 2(1): 31-54.
32. Irwin, E. G., and N. E. Bockstael. (2004). Endogenous Spatial Externalities: Empirical Evidence and Implications for Exurban Residential Land Use Patterns. In Advances in Spatial Econometrics, edited by L. Anselin, R. Florax, and S. Rey. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
33. Johnston, R. J. (2002). Conserving Farm and Forest in a Changing Rural Landscape: Current and Potential Contributions of Economic Research. Regional Rural Development Paper no. 11. Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.
34. Johnston, R. J., J. J. Opaluch, T. A. Grigalunas, and M. J. Mazzotta. (2001). Estimating Amenity Benefits of Coastal Farmland. Growth and Change 32(Summer): 305-325.
35. Johnston, R. J., S. K. Swallow, T. J. Tyrrell, and D. M. Bauer. (2003). Rural Amenity Values and Length of Residency. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(4): 1000-1015.
36. Josling, T. (2002). Competing Paradigms in the OECD and Their Impact on the WTO Agriculture Talks. In Agricultural Policy for the 21st Century edited by L. Tweeten and S. R. Thompson. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 245-264.
37. Kline, J., and D. Wichelns. (1994). Using Referendum Data to Characterize Public Support for Purchasing Development Rights to Farmland. Land Economics 70(2): 223-233.
38. Kline, J., and D. Wichelns. (1998). Measuring Heterogeneous Preferences for Preserving Farmland and Open Space. Ecological Economics 26(2): 211-224.
39. Kramer, R. A., and L. Shabman. (1993). The Effects of Agricultural and Tax Policy Reform on the Economic Return to Wetland Drainage in the Mississippi Delta Region. Land Economics 69(3): 249-262.
40. Land Trust Alliance. (2003). Americans Invest in Parks and Open Space: LandVote 2003. Washington, DC: Land Trust Alliance.
41. Lynch, L., and J. M. Duke. (2003). Linkages between Agricultural and Conservation Policies: Workshop Proceedings. Regional Rural Development Paper no. 21. Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.
42. Nelson, A. C., and J. B. Duncan. (1995). Growth Management Principles and Practices. Chicago: American Planning Association.
43. Nickerson, C. (2001). Smart Growth: Implications for Agriculture in Urban Fringe Areas. Agricultural Outlook. April. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
44. Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development. (2002). Land Use Problems and Conflicts in the U.S.: A Comprehensive Research Agenda for the 21st Century. Rural Development Paper no. 10. University Park, PA.
45. Owens, N. (2004). Economic Analysis at EPA: Requirements and Research Needs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association. August 1-4, Denver, CO.
46. Parks, P. J., and J. P. Schorr. (1997). Sustaining Open Space Benefits in the Northeast: An Evaluation of the Conservation Reserve Program. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32(1): 85-94.
47. Pasha, H. A. (1996). Suburban Minimum Lot Zoning and Spatial Equilibrium. Journal of Urban Economics 40(1): 1-12.
48. Plantinga, A. (1996). The Effect of Agricultural Policies on Land Use and Environmental Quality. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(4): 1082-1091.
49. Portney, P. R. (2004). The Obligations of a Policy Economist. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 33(2): 159-161.
50. Prendergast, J. R., R. M. Quinn, and J. H. Lawton. (1999). The Gaps between Theory and Practice in Selecting Nature Reserves. Conservation Biology 13(3): 484-492.
51. Ready, R. C., M. C. Berger, and G. C. Blomquist. (1997). Measuring Amenity Benefits from Farmland: Hedonic Pricing vs. Contingent Valuation. Growth and Change 28(Fall): 438-458.
52. Roe, B., E. G. Irwin, and H. A. Morrow-Jones. (2004). The Effects of Farmland, Farmland Preservation, and Other Neighborhood Amenities on Housing Values and Residential Growth. Land Economics 80(1): 55-74.
53. Rosenberger, R. S., and R. G. Walsh. (1997). Nonmarket Value of Western Valley Ranch-land Using Contingent Valuation. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22(2): 296-309.
54. Sen, A. (1993). Markets and Freedoms: Achievements and Limitations of the Market Mechanism in Promoting Individual Freedoms. Oxford Economic Papers 45: 519-541.
55. Simpson, R. D. (1998). Economic Analysis and Ecosystems: Some Concepts and Issues. Ecological Applications 8(2): 342-349.
56. Turner, R. K. (1999). The Place of Economic Values in Environmental Valuation. In Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries, edited by I. J. Bateman and K. G. Willis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. University of Connecticut Cooperative Extension, Nonpoint Education for Municipal Officials (NEMO) Project. (1999). Conservation Subdivisions: A Better Way to Protect Water Quality, Retain Wildlife, and Preserve Rural Character. NEMO Project Fact Sheet. Storrs: University of Connecticut College of Agriculture.
58. van Kooten, C. G. (1993). Bioeconomic Evaluation of Government Agricultural Programs on Wetlands Conversion. Land Economics 69(1): 27-38.