Examining incentives for adjacent non-industrial private forest landowners to cooperate

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 104-110

  Vokoun, Melinda ^a   Amacher, Gregory S ^b   Sullivan, Jay ^b   Wear, Dave ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STEVENS POINT   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Amenity values; Forest management; Harvesting; Spatial interdependence; Strategic behavior

Indexed keywords

AMENITY VALUES; FOREST HEALTH; FOREST MANAGEMENT; JOINT FOREST MANAGEMENTS; LANDSCAPE LEVEL; NON-INDUSTRIAL PRIVATE FOREST LANDOWNERS; NON-TIMBER BENEFITS; SPATIAL FACTORS; STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR; SURVEY DATA;

HARVESTING; HEALTH RISKS; TIMBER;

FORESTRY;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; FORESTS; HARVESTING; HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 72149122906     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Amacher G., Conway C., and Sullivan J. Econometric analysis of forest landowners: is there anything left to study?. Journal of Forest Economics 9 2 (2003) 137-164
2. Amacher G., Koskela E., and Ollikainen M. Forest rotation and stand interdependency: ownership structure and timing of decisions. Natural Resource Modeling 17 1 (2004) 1-45
3. Bowes M., and Krutilla J. Multiple-use management of public forestlands. In: Kneese A., and Sweeney J. (Eds). Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics Vol. II (1985), North Holland, Amsterdam 655-663
4. Brunson M.W., Yarrow D.T., Roberts S.D., Guynn Jr. D.C., and Kuhns M.R. Nonindustrial private forest owners and ecosystem management: can they work together?. Journal of Forestry 94 6 (1996) 14-21
5. Conway M.C., Amacher G.S., and Sullivan J. Decisions nonindustrial forest landowners make: an empirical examination. Journal of Forest Economics 9 3 (2003) 181-203
6. Dillman D.A. Mail and Telephone Surveys: the Total Design Method (1978), John Wiley & Sons, New York 325 pp
7. Dillman D.A. Mail and Telephone Surveys: the Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed (2001), John Wiley & Sons, New York 464 pp
8. Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis. Fourth edition (2000), New Jersey, Prentice Hall 1004 pp
9. Hartman R. The harvesting decision when a standing forest has value. Economic Inquiry 14 (1976) 52-58
10. Hyberg B.T., and Holthausen D.M. The behavior of nonindustrial private forest landowners. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19 (1989) 1014-1023
11. Jacobson M. Ecosystem management in the United States: interest of forest landowners in joint management across ownerships. Small Scale Forest Economics, Management, and Policy 1 1 (2002) 71-92
12. Jacobson M., Abt R., and Carter D. Attitudes toward joint forest planning among private landowners. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 11 3 (2000) 95-112
13. Jenkins D.H., Sullivan J., Amacher G.S., Nicholas N.S., and Reaves D.W. Valuing high altitude spruce-fir forest improvements: importance of forest condition and recreation activity. Journal of Forest Economics 8 1 (2002) 77-99
14. Klosowski R., Stevens T., Kittredge D., and Dennis D. Economic incentives for coordinated management of forest land: a case study of Southern New England. Forest Policy and Economics 2 (2001) 29-38
15. Koskela E., and Ollikainen M. Optimal private and public harvesting under spatial and temporal interdependence. Forest Science 47 4 (2001) 596-607
16. Kuuluvainen J., Karppinen H., and Ovaskainen V. Landowner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply. Forest Science 42 3 (1996) 300-309
17. Maddala G.S. Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (1983), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 401 pp
18. Randall A. The NOAA panel report: a new beginning of the end of an era?. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 5 (1997) 1489-1494
19. Stevens T.H., Dennis D., Kittredge D., and Rickenbach M. Attitudes and preferences toward co-operative management agreements for management of private forestlands in the North-eastern United States. Journal of Environmental Management 55 (1999) 81-90
20. Sullivan J., Amacher G.S., and Chapman S. Forest banking and forest landowners forgoing management rights for guaranteed financial returns. Forest Policy and Economics 7 3 (2005) 381-392
21. Swallow S., and Wear D. Spatial interactions in multiple-use forestry and substitution and wealth effects for the single stand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25 (1993) 103-120
22. Vokoun M., Amacher G.S., and Wear D.N. Scale of harvesting by non-industrial private forest landowners. Journal of Forest Economics 11 4 (2006) 223-244