Twelve-Month Follow-up of Lumbar Spine Range of Motion Following Intervertebral Disc Replacement Using Radiostereometric Analysis

SAS Journal

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 9-15

  Ordway, Nathaniel R ^a   Fayyazi, Amir H ^b   Abjornson, Celeste ^c   Calabrese, Jerry ^a   Park, Soo An ^a   Fredrickson, Bruce ^a   Yonemura, Kenneth ^d   Yuan, Hansen A ^a  

^a SUNY UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Advanced Healthcare   (United States)

^c Synthes Spine ^*  (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Kinematics; ProDisc L; radiostereometric analysis; range of motion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FILM; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC REPLACEMENT; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; KINEMATICS; LUMBAR SPINE; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POPULATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOSTEREOMETRIC ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; TANTALUM BEAD;

EID: 72149095815     PISSN: 19359810     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1935-9810(08)70012-4     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Madan S.S., and Boeree N.R. Comparison of instrumented anterior interbody fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J 12 6 (2003) 567-575
2. Thomsen K., Christensen F.B., Eiskjaer S.P., Hansen E.S., Fruensgaard S., and Bunger C.E. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Spine 22 24 (1997) 2813-2822
3. Malmivaara A., Slatis P., Heliovaara M., et al. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine 32 1 (2007) 1-8
4. Aiki H., Ohwada O., Kobayashi H., et al. Adjacent segment stenosis after lumbar fusion requiring second operation. J Orthop Sci 10 5 (2005) 490-495
5. Ghiselli G., Wang J.C., Hsu W.K., and Dawson E.G. L5-S1 segment survivorship and clinical outcome analysis after L4-L5 isolated fusion. Spine 28 12 (2003) 1275-1280 discussion 1280
6. Hilibrand A.S., and Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion?. Spine J 4 suppl 6 (2004) 190S-194S
7. Errico T.J. Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435 (2005) 106-117
8. Gamradt S.C., and Wang J.C. Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Spine J 5 1 (2005) 95-103
9. Putzier M., Funk J.F., Schneider S.V., et al. Charite total disc replacement--clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 15 2 (2006) 183-195
10. Fernstrom U. Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprothesis in herniated disc and in painful disc. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 357 (1966) 154-159
11. Blumenthal S., McAfee P.C., Guyer R.D., et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30 14 (2005) 1565-1575 discussion E1387-1591
12. Zigler J., Delamarter R., Spivak J.M., et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 32 11 (2007) 1155-1162 discussion 1163
13. Delamarter R.B., Fribourg D.M., Kanim L.E., and Bae H. ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial. Spine 28 20 (2003) S167-175
14. Zigler J.E. Clinical results with ProDisc: European experience and U.S. investigation device exemption study. Spine 28 20 (2003) S163-166
15. Tournier C., Aunoble S., Le Huec J.C., et al. Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement. Eur Spine J 16 3 (2007) 411-421
16. SariAli el H., Lemaire J.P., Pascal-Mousselard H., Carrier H., and Skalli W. In vivo study of the kinematics in axial rotation of the lumbar spine after total intervertebral disc replacement: long-term results: a 10-14 years follow up evaluation. Eur Spine J 15 10 (2006) 1501-1510
17. Lim M.R., Girardi F.P., Zhang K., Huang R.C., Peterson M.G., and Cammisa Jr. F.P. Measurement of total disc replacement radiographic range of motion: a comparison of two techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 18 3 (2005) 252-256
18. Cakir B., Richter M., Puhl W., and Schmidt R. Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method. Eur Spine J 15 2 (2006) 165-173
19. Lim M.R., Loder R.T., Huang R.C., et al. Measurement error of lumbar total disc replacement range of motion. Spine 31 10 (2006) E291-297
20. Gunnarsson G., Axelsson P., Johnsson R., and Stromqvist B. A method to evaluate the in vivo behaviour of lumbar spine implants. Eur Spine J 9 3 (2000) 230-234
21. Axelsson P., and Karlsson B.S. Intervertebral mobility in the progressive degenerative process. A radiostereometric analysis. Eur Spine J 13 6 (2004) 567-572
22. Krijnen M.R., Valstar E.R., Smit T.H., and Wuisman P.I. Does bioresorbable cage material influence segment stability in spinal interbody fusion?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 448 (2006) 33-38
23. Brooks D., Ordway N.R., Sacks J., and Fredrickson B.E. Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of Radiostereometric Analysis in Lumbar and Cervical Spine Surgery. Orthopaedic Research Society (2001)
24. Huang R.C., Girardi F.P., Cammisa Jr. F.P., Lim M.R., Tropiano P., and Marnay T. Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up. Spine 30 12 (2005) 1407-1411
25. Delamarter R.B., Bae H.W., and Pradhan B.B. Clinical results of ProDisc-II lumbar total disc replacement: report from the United States clinical trial. Orthop Clin North Am 36 3 (2005) 301-313
26. White A.A., and Panjabi M.M. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 2 ed. (1990), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia