Steady atomic entanglement in cavity QED without state initialization

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 6, 2009, Pages

  Zhang, Shengli ^a,b   Zou, Xubo ^a   Yang, Song ^a   Li, Chuanfeng ^a   Jin, Chenhui ^b   Guo, Guangcan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b INFORMATION ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOM-CAVITY SYSTEMS; ATOMIC ENTANGLEMENT; ATOMIC STATE; CAVITY DECAY; CAVITY QED; ENTANGLEMENT STATE; HIGH FIDELITY; SPONTANEOUS DECAY RATES; THERMAL FIELD; TRAPPED ATOMS;

DECAY (ORGANIC);

ATOMS;

EID: 72049115232     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.062320     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. J. S. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 195 (1965).
2. C. Monroe, Nature (London) 416, 238 (2002). 10.1038/416238a
3. H. Mabuchi and A. C. Doherty, Science 298, 1372 (2002). 10.1126/science.1078446
4. J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A 50, R2799 (1994). 10.1103/PhysRevA.50.R2799
5. E. Hagley, X. Maitre, G. Nogues, C. Wunderlich, M. Brune, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1 (1997). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1
6. M. Freyberger, P. K. Aravind, M. A. Horne, and A. Shimony, Phys. Rev. A 53, 1232 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevA.53.1232
7. B. J. Oliver and C. R. Stroud, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 1426 (1987). 10.1364/JOSAB.4.001426
8. I. K. Kudryavtsev and P. L. Knight, J. Mod. Opt. 40, 1673 (1993). 10.1080/09500349314551681
9. L. M. Duan and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 253601 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.253601
10. S. Bose, P. L. Knight, M. B. Plenio, and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5158 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.5158
11. A. S. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 127903 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.127903
12. C. Cabrillo, J. I. Cirac, P. García-Fernández, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1025 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.1025
13. D. E. Browne, M. B. Plenio, and S. F. Huelga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 067901 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.067901
14. J. Hong and H. W. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 237901 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.237901
15. A. S. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 097905 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.097905
16. J. Metz, M. Trupke, and A. Beige, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 040503 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.040503
17. J. Metz and A. Beige, Phys. Rev. A 76, 022331 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.022331
18. M. B. Plenio, S. F. Huelga, A. Beige, and P. L. Knight, Phys. Rev. A 59, 2468 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.2468
19. S. G. Clark and A. S. Parkins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 047905 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.047905
20. A. S. Parkins, E. Solano, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 053602 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.053602
21. D. F. V. James, Fortschr. Phys. 48, 823 (2000). 10.1002/1521-3978(200009) 48:9/11<823::AID-PROP823>3.0.CO;2-M
22. M. S. Zubairy, M. Kim, and M. O. Scully, Phys. Rev. A 68, 033820 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.033820
23. It can be directly obtained that Σ12 =- ω̄1 ∼ 14 -i Δ2E ∼ 12, Σ23 = ω̄1 ∼ 43 +i Δ2E ∼ 23, and Σ24 = ω̄1 ∼ 44 +i Δ2E ∼ 24.
24. C. J. Hood, Science 287, 1447 (2000). 10.1126/science.287.5457.1447
25. With a much lower γ, the characterization time will be prolonged, which may impose some limitation on the velocity for state preparation.
26. D. Kleppner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 233 (1981) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.233
27. F. De Martini, G. Innocenti, G. R. Jacobovitz, and P. Mataloni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2955 (1987) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2955
28. W. Jhe, A. Anderson, E. A. Hinds, D. Meschede, L. Moi, and S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 666 (1987). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.666
29. T. J. Rogers, D. G. Deppe, and B. G. Streetman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 1858 (1990). 10.1063/1.104120