Scenario-based reservoir modelling: The need for more determinism and less anchoring

Geological Society Special Publication

Volumn 309, Issue , 2008, Pages 145-159

  Bentley, Mark ^a   Smith, Simon ^a  

^a TRACS International   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOSTATISTICS; HYDROCARBON RESERVOIR; MODELING; PROBABILITY; RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION;

EID: 72049094804     PISSN: 03058719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1144/SP309.11     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alession, L., Coca, S. & Bourdon, L. 2005. Experimental design as a framework for multiple history matching: F6 further development studies. SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Paper SPE n° 93164.
2. Baddeley, M. C., Curtis, A. & Wood, R. 2004. An introduction to prior information derived from probabilistic judgements: elicitation of knowledge, cognitive bias and herding. In: Curtis, A. & Wood, R. (eds) Geological Prior Information: Informing Science and Engineering. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 239, 15-27.
3. Bentley, M.R. & Hartung, M. 2001. A 4D surprise at Gannet B - a way forward through seismicallg-constrained scenario-based reservoir modelling. EAGE Annual Technical Conference. Amsterdam. Abstract.
4. Bentley, M.R. & Woodhead, T. J. 1998. Uncertainty Handling Through Scenario-Based Reservoir Modelling. SPE Asia Pacific Conference on Integrated Modeling for Asset Management. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, SPE n° 39717.
5. Box, G., Hunter, W. & Hunter, J. 1978. Statistics for Experimenters. An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis and Model Building. Wiley, New York.
6. Cosentino, L. 2001. Integrated Reservoir Studies. Editions Technip, Paris.
7. Dubrule, O. & Damsleth, E. 2001. Achievements and challenges in petroleum geostatistics. Petroleum Geoscience, 7,1-7.
8. Egeland, T., Hatlebakk, E., Holden, L. & Larsen, E. A. 1992. Designing Better Decisions. SPE European Petroleum Computer Conference, Stavanger, Norway. SPE n° 24275.
9. Kloosterman, H. J., Kelly, R. S., Stammeijer, J., Hartung, M., Van Waarde, J. & Chajecki, C. 2003. Successful application of time-lapse seismic data in Shell Expro's Gannet Fields, Central North Sea, UKCS. Petroleum Geoscience, 9, 25-34.
10. Li, B. & Friedman, F. 2005. Novel Multiple Resolutions Design of Experiment/Response Surface Methodology for Uncertainty Analysis of Reservoir Simulation Forecasts. SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. The Woodlands, Texas 2005, SPE n° 92853.
11. Van der Heijden, K. 1996. Scenarios: the Art of Strategic Conversation. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
12. Van de Leemput, L.E.C, Bertram, D., Bentley, M. R. & Gelling, R. 1995. Full field reservoir modelling of Central Oman gas/condensate fields. Spe Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, USA, SPE n° 30757.
13. Mintzberg, H. 1990. The design school: reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 171-195.
14. Peng, C.Y. & Gupta, R. 2005. Experimental design and analysis methods in multiple deterministic modelling for quantifying hydrocarbon in-place probability distribution curve. SPE Asia Pacific Conference on Integrated Modelling for Asset Management. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, SPE n° 87002.
15. Plackett, R. & Burman, J. 1946. The Design of Optimum Multifactorial Experiments. Biometrika, 33, 305-325.
16. Smith, S., Bentley, M. R., Southwood, D. A., Wynn, T.J. & Spence, A. (2005). Why reservoir models so often disappoint - some lessons learned. Petroleum Studies Group meeting, Geological Society, London. Abstract.
17. Taylor, S. R. 1996. 3D Modeling to Optimize Production at the Successive Stages of Field Life. SPE Formation Evaluation, 11, 205-210.
18. Yeten, B., Castellini, A., Guyaguler, B. & Chen, W. H. 2005. A Comparison Study on Experimental Design and Response Surface Methodologies. SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. The Woodlands, Texas, SPE n° 93347.