Novel multiple resolutions design of experiment/response surface methodology for uncertainty analysis of reservoir simulation forecasts

SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 41-56

  Li, B ^a   Friedmann, F ^a  

^a SPE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BENCHMARKING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; FORECASTING; INTERPOLATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; RISK MANAGEMENT;

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT (DOE); MANAGEMENT DECISION PROCESSES; RESERVOIR SIMULATION FORECASTS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY (RSM);

PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION;

EID: 22244479668     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2523/92853-ms     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Box, G.E.P., and Wilson, K. G.: Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces, Wiley, New York, 1987.
2. Montgomery, D.C.: Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, INC., 2001.
3. Box, G.E.P., and Hunter, J.S.: "Multifactor Experimental Designs for Exploring Response Surfaces," Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 28 (1957), pp. 195-242.
4. Box, G.E.P., and Wilson, K. G.: "On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions," Journal of Royal Statistical Society, B., Vol.13 (1951), pp. 1-45.
5. Chu, C.: "Prediction of Steamflood Performance in Heavy-Oil Reservoirs Using Correlations Developed by Factorial Design Method," paper SPE 20020 presented at the 1990 SPE California Regional Meeting, Ventura, April 4-6.
6. Egeland, T. et al.: "Designing Better Decisions," paper SPE 24275 presented at the 1992 SPE European Petroleum Computer Conference, Stavanger, May 25-27.
7. Damsleth, E., Hage, A., and Volden, R.: "Maximum Information at Minimum Cost: A North Sea Field Development Study With an Experimental Design," J. Pet. Techn. pp. 1350-1356.
8. Friedmann, F., Chawathé, A., and Lame, D. K.: "Assessing Uncertainty in Channelized Reservoir Using Experimental Designs," SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, August 2003, p. 264-274.
9. Dejean, J.-P., and Blance, G.: "Managing Uncertainties on Productions Using Integrated Statistical Methods," paper SPE 56696, presented at the 1999 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Houston, Texas, 3-6 October.
10. Corre, B., Thore, P., de Feraudy, V., and Vincent, G.: "Integrated Uncertainty Assessment For Project Evaluation and Risk Analysis," paper SPE 65205, presented at the SPE European Petroleum Conference held in Paris, France, 24-25 October 2000.
11. Manceau, E., Meaghani, M., Zabalza-Mezghani, I., and Roggero, F.: "Combination of Experimental Design and Joint Modeling Methods for Quantifying the Risk Associated With Deterministic and Stochastic Uncertainties - An Integrated Test Study," paper SPE 71620 presented at the 2001 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in New Orleans, Louisiana, 30 September - 3 October 2001.
12. th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Røros, Norway, 7-10 June, 1994.
13. Landa, J.L. and Güyagüler, B.: "A Methodology for History Matching and the Assessment of Uncertainties Associated with Flow Prediction," paper SPE 84465, presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Denver, Colorado, USA, 5-8 October 2003.
14. Güyagüler, B. and Horne, R. N.: "Uncertainty Assessment of Well-Placement Optimization," paper SPE 71625, presented at the 2001 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in New Orleans, Louisiana, 30 September -3 October 2001.
15. Li, B., A Control Volume Function Approximation Method for Reservoir Simulation Using Unstructured Grids, dissertation, Southern Methodist University, 2003.
16. Killough, J. E.: "Ninth SPE Comparative Solution Project: A Examination of Black-Oil Simulation," paper SPE 29910, presented at the 13th SPE Symposium on Reservoir Simulation held in San Antonio, TX, 12-15 February, 1995.
17. Deutsch, C.V., Geostatistical Reservoir Modeling, Oxford Univ. Press, 2002.