An investigation of image users across disciplines: A model of image needs, retrieval and use

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 45, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Beaudoin, Joan ^a  

^a Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71949093976     PISSN: 15508390     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.2008.14504503118     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Angeles, M. (1998). Information organization and information use of visual resources collections. Visual Resources Association Bulletin, 25(3), 51-58.
2. Armitage, L., & Enser, P. (1997). Analysis of user needs in image archives. Journal of Information Science, 4, 287-299.
3. Attig, J., Copeland, A., & Pelikan, M. (2004). Context and meaning: the challenges of metadata for a digital image library within the university. College and Research Libraries, 65 (3), 251-261.
4. Bakewell, E. et al., (Gen. Ed.). (1988). Object, image, inquiry: The art historian at work. Santa Monica: CA: Getty Art History Information Program.
5. Batley, S. (1988). Visual information retrieval: Browsing strategies in pictorial databases. In Online Information 88, Proceedings of the 12th Internations Online Information Meeting, 373-381.
6. Beaudoin, J. 2007. Visual Materials & Online Access: Issues Concerning Content Representation. Art Documentation, 26 (2): 24-28.
7. Bradfield, V. (1976). Slide collections: a user requirements survey. British Library Research & Development Report 5309. 1976 September. Leicester Polytechnic.
8. Busch, J. (1994). Thinking Ambiguously: Organizing Source Materials for Historical Research. In R. Fidel, T. Bellardo Hahn, E. M. Rasmussen, & P. J. Smith (Eds.), Challenges in indexing electronic text and images, 23-55. Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
9. Challener, J. (1999). Information-Seeking Behavior of Professors of Art History and Studio Art. Master's Thesis, Kent State University.
10. Chen, H. (2007). A socio-technical perspective on museum practitioners' image-using behaviors. Electronic Library, 25(1), 18-35.
11. -. (2001). An analysis of image queries in the field of art history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(3), 260-273.
12. Chidlow, J. (1991). The information needs of architectural practices. Art Libraries Journal, 16(3), 18-224.
13. Choi, Y. & Rasmussen, E. (2003). Searching for images: The analysis of users' queries for image retrieval in American history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 498-511.
14. -. (2002). User's relevance criteria in image retrieval in American history. Information Processing and Management, 38(5), 695-726.
15. Conniss, L., Ashford, J., & Graham, M. (2000). Information seeking behavior in image retrieval: VISOR I Final Report. Institute for Image Data Research, (Library and Information Commission Research Report 95).
16. Cunningham, S., & Masoodian, M. (2006). Looking for a picture: an analysis of everyday image information searching. Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries, 198-199.
17. Cunningham, S., Bainbridge, D., & Masoodian, M. (2004). How people describe their image information needs: a grounded theory analysis of visual arts queries. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries, 7-11 June, 2004, 47-48.
18. Efthimiadis, E. & Fidel, R. (2000). The Effect of Query Type on Subject Searching Behavior of Image Databases: an Exploratory Study. Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, 328-330.
19. Enser, P. (1993). Query analysis in a visual information retrieval context. Journal of Document & Text Management, 1(1), 25-52.
20. Fidel, R. (1997). Image Retrieval Task: Implications for the Design and Evaluation of Image Databases. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 3, 181-199.
21. Frost, C. et al. (2000). Browse and Search Patterns in a Digital Image Database. Information Retrieval, 1(4), 287-313.
22. Frost, C., & Noakes, A. (1998). Browsing images using broad classification categories. In Jacob E. K. (Ed.), Knowledge Organization and Change, Proceedings of the 9th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, October 25, 1998, Pittsburgh, PA, 71-89.
23. Giral, A. (1998). Digital image libraries and the teaching of art and architectural history. Art Libraries Journal, 23(4), 18-25.
24. Goodrum, A., Bejune, M., & Siochi, A. (2003). A State Transition Analysis of Image Search Patterns on the Web. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2728, 281-290.
25. Goodrum, A., & Spink, A. (2001). Image searching on the Excite Web Search Engine. Information Processing and Management, 37(2), 295-312.
26. Gould, C. (1988). Information Needs in the Humanities: An Assessment. (Stanford, CA: The Research Libraries Group).
27. Grout, C. et al. (2000). Creating Digital Resources for the Visual Arts: Standards and Good Practices. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
28. Hastings, S. (1999). Evaluation of Image Retrieval Systems: Role of User Feedback. Library Trends, 48(2), 438-452.
29. Jörgensen, C. (2003). Image retrieval: theory and research. Lanham, MD & Oxford: Scarecrow Press, Inc.
30. -. (1998). Attributes of images in describing tasks. Information Processing & Management, 34(2/3), 161-174.
31. -., & Jörgensen, P. (2005). Image querying by image professionals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(12), 1346-1359.
32. Matusiak, K. (2006). Information seeking behavior in digital image collections: A cognitive approach. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(5), 479-488.
33. Ornager, S. (1995). The newspaper image database: Empirical supported analysis of users' typology and word association clusters. In E. Fox, P. Ingwersen, & R. Fidel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Annual Special Interest Group Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIRM '95), 212-218. New York: ACM Press.
34. Pisciotta, H. et al. (2005). Penn State's Visual Image User Study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 5(1), 33-58. Retrieved on April 14, 2007 from: http://muse.jhu.edu/demo/portal-libraries-and-the-academy/v005/5. 1pisciotta.pdf.
35. Pisciotta, H., & Copeland, A. (2003). Accessing User Needs for an Image Delivery System. ACRL Eleventh National Conference, April 10-13, 2003, Charlotte, North Carolina.
36. Roberts, H. (1985). Visual resources: proposals for an ideal network. Art Libraries Journal, 10, 32-41.
37. Sklar, H. (1995). Why make images available online: User perspectives. In P. McClung (ed) RLG Digital Image Access Project, 11-18. Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group.
38. Stafford, B. (1996). Good Looking: Essays on the Virtue of Images. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
39. Turner, J. (1993). Subject access to pictures: Considerations in the surrogation and indexing of visual documents for storage and retrieval. Visual Resources, 9(3), 245-247.