Skype-based tandem language learning and web 2.0

Handbook of Research on Web 2.0 and Second Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 101-118

  Mullen, Tony ^a   Appel, Christine ^b   Shanklin, Trevor ^c  

^a TSUDA COLLEGE   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITAT OBERTA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^c SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71849119578     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-190-2.ch006     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Appel, C., & Mullen, T. (2002). A new tool for teachers and researchers involved in e-mail tandem language learning. ReCALL, 14(2), 195-208.
2. Appel, C., & Gilabert, R. (2002). Motivation and task performance in a task-based, Web-based tandem project. ReCALL, 14(1), 16-31.
3. Brammerts, H., Kleppin, K., Schleyer, J., & Zarco de la Hoz, F. (1989). Tandem Bochum-Oviedo, Intensivkurs Deutsch, Tándem Oviedo-Bochum, Curso intensivo de español, Oviedo 2.9198930.9.1989. Bochum: Seminar für Sprachlehrforschung der Ruhr-Universität [dto. 1990, 1991].
4. Branzburg, J. (2007). Talk is cheap: Skype can make VoIP a very real communication option for your school. Technology & Learning, 27(8), 36.
5. Breen, M. (1989). The evaluation cycle for language learning tasks. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Calvert, M. (1992). Working in tandem: Peddling an old idea. Language Learning Journal, 6, 17-19.
7. Elia, A. (2006). VOIP and Skype: A New frontier of online language learning. IATEFL CALL Review, Summer, 30-34.
8. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Esch, E. (1996). Promoting learner autonomy: Criteria for the selection of appropriate methods. In R. Pemberton, E. S. L. Li., W. W. F. Or., & H. D. Pierson (Eds.), Taking Control, Autonomy in language learning (pp. 35-48). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
10. Godwin-Jones, R. (2005). Emerging technologies: Skype and Podcasting. Disruptive technologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 9-12.
11. Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
12. Knight, P. (2005). Learner interaction using email: the effects of task modification. ReCALL 17(1), 101-121.
13. Little, D. (1991). Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.
14. Little, D., & Brammerts, H. (1996). A guide to language learning in tandem via the Internet. CLCS Occasional Paper No. 46. Dublin: Trinity College, Centre for Language and Communication Studies.
15. Little, D., Ushioda, E., Appel, M. C., Moran, J., O'Rourke, B., & Schwienhorst, K. (1999). Evaluating tandem language learning by e-mail. Report on a bilateral project. CLCS Occasional Paper No. 55. Dublin: Trinity College, Centre for Language and Communication Studies.
16. Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-na-tive-speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126-141.
17. Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
18. Long, M. (1989). Task, group, and task-group interactions. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL 8(2),1-26.
19. O'Dowd, R., & Ritter, M. (2006). Understanding and working with 'Failed Communication.' Telecollaborative Exchanges. CALICO 23(3), 623-642.
20. Prabhu, N.S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Robin, R. (2007). Commentary: Learner-Based listening and technological authenticity. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 109-115.
22. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources and syllabus design: a triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 287-318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38-62.
24. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
25. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371-391.