Do palatal implants remain positionally stable under orthodontic load? A clinical radiologic study

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 136, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 695-699

  Wehrbein, Heinrich ^a   Göllner, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MAINZ   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SCREW; CEPHALOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHODONTICS; PALATE; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; RADIOGRAPHY; TIME; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; BONE SCREWS; CEPHALOMETRY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE PROCEDURES; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PALATE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH MOVEMENT; WEIGHT-BEARING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 71849114586     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.050     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Heyman G.C., and Tulloch J.F.C. Implantable devices as orthodontic anchorage: a review of current treatment modalities. J Esthet Restor Dent 18 (2007) 68-80
2. Bousquet F., Bousquet P., Mauran G., and Parquel P. Use of an impacted post for anchorage. J Clin Orthod 5 (1996) 261-265
3. Costa A., Raffini M., and Melsen B. Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage. A preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 13 (1998) 201-209
4. Creekmore T.D., and Eklund M.K. The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod 17 (1983) 266-269
5. Liou E.J.W., Pai B.C.J., and Lin J.C.Y. Do mini-screws remain stationary under orthodontic forces?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126 (2004) 42-47
6. Ludwig B. Miniimplants in orthodontics (2007), Quintessenz, Berlin, Chicago, Tokyo
7. Melsen B., and Costa A. Immediate loading of implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Orthod Res 3 (2000) 23-28
8. Park H.S., Jeong S.H., and Kwon O.W. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 (2006) 18-25
9. Wehrbein H., Glatzmaier J., Mundwiller U., and Diedrich P. The Orthosystem. A new implant system for orthodontic anchorage in the palate. J Orofac Orthop 57 (1996) 142-153
10. Wehrbein H., Feifel H., and Diedrich P. Palatal implant anchorage reinforcement of posterior teeth. A prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116 (1999) 678-686
11. Bantleon H.P., Bernhard T., Crismani A.G., and Zachrisson B.J. Stable orthodontic anchorage with palatal osseointegrated implants. World J Orthod 3 (2002) 109-116
12. Bernhard T., Vollgruber A., Gahleitner A., Dortbudak O., and Haas R. Alternative to the median region of the palate for placement of an orthodontic implant. Clin Oral Implants Res 11 (2000) 595-601
13. Bernhard T., Dörtbudak O., Wehrbein H., Baier C., Bantleon H.P., and Kucher G. Das Gaumenimplantat. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 32 (2000) 209-229
14. Crismani A.G., Bernhart T., Schwarz K., Čelar A.G., Bantleon H.P., and Watzek G. Ninety percent success in palatal implants loaded 1 week after placement. A clinical evaluation with resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 17 (2006) 445-450
15. Kang S., Lee S.J., Ahn S.J., Heo M.S., and Kim T.W. Bone thickness of the palate for orthodontic mini-implant anchorage in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131 suppl (2007) S74-S81
16. Smith D.E., and Zarb G.A. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prothet Dent 62 (1989) 567-572
17. Wehrbein H., Merz B.R., and Diedrich P. Palatal bone support for orthodontic implant anchorage reinforcement. A clinical and radiological study. Eur J Orthod 27 (1999) 65-70
18. Houston W.J. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 83 (1983) 382-390
19. Wehrbein H., Merz B.R., Hämmerle C.H.F., and Lang P.N. Bone-to-implant contact of orthodontic implants in humans subjected to horizontal loading. Clin Oral Implants Res 9 (1998) 348-353
20. Wilke H.J., Claes L., and Steinemann S. The influence of various titanium implants surfaces on the interface shear strength between implant and bone. In: Heinke G.U., Soltesz A., and Lee J.C. (Eds). Advances in biomaterials, volume 9 (1990), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
21. Buser D., Schenk R.K., Steinmann S., Fiorelli J.P., Fox C.H., and Stich H. Influence of the surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mat Res 25 (1991) 889-902
22. Kravitz N.D., and Kosnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131 Suppl (2007) S43-S51