Discourse analysis of teaching computing online

Computer Science Education

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 69-92

  Bower, Matt ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Discourse analysis; Online learning; Teaching styles

Indexed keywords

EID: 71849101681     PISSN: 08993408     EISSN: 17445175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08993400902909500     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bauer, M. W., 2000. “ Classical content analysis ”. In Qualitative research with text image and sound, Edited by: Bauer, M. W., and Gaskell, G., 131–151. London: Sage Publications.
2. Bower, M., 2008. Designing for interactive and collaborative learning in a web-conferencing environment Retrieved February 20, 2009, from: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/26888
3. Britain, S., 2007. “ Learning design systems ”. In Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing and delivering e-learning, Edited by: Beetham, H., and Sharpe, R., 103–114. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
4. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., and Holum, A., 1991. Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 6 (11): 38–46.
5. Koopmans, L., 1987. Introduction to contemporary statistical methods, 2nd ed., Boston, MA: Duxbury.
6. Laurillard, D., 2002. Rethinking university teaching–a framework for the effective use of learning technologies, Oxford, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
7. McDowell, C., Werner, L., Bullock, H., and Fernald, J., The effects of pair-programming on performance in an introductory programming course. Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Edited by: Grissom, S., pp. 38–42. New York: ACM Press.
8. Nagappan, N., Williams, L., Ferzli, M., Wiebe, E., Yang, K., Miller, C., Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming. Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Edited by: Dann, W., pp. 359–362. New York: ACM Press.
9. Naidu, S., and Jarvela, S., 2006. Analyzing CMC content for what?. Computers & Education, 46 (1): 96–103.
10. Neale, D. C., Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B., Evaluating computer-supported cooperative work: Models and frameworks. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Edited by: Herbsleb, J., and Olson, G., pp. 112–121. New York: ACM Press.
11. Oliver, R., Harper, B., Wills, S., Agostinho, S., and Hedberg, J., 2007. “ Describing ICT-based learning designs that promote quality learning outcomes ”. In Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing and delivering e-learning, Edited by: Beetham, H., and Sharpe, R., 64–80. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
12. Pullen, M. J., Scaling up a distance education program in computer science. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. Edited by: Goldweber, M., and Salomoni, P., pp. 33–37. New York: ACM.
13. Reushle, S., and Loch, B. I., 2008. Conducting a trial of web conferencing software: Why, how, and perceptions from the coalface. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9 (3): 19–28.
14. Strijbos, J.-W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., and Jochems, W. M.G., 2006. Content analysis: What are they talking about?. Computers & Education, 46 (1): 29–48.
15. Waite, W. M., Jackson, M. H., and Diwan, A., The conversational classroom. Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Edited by: Dann, W., pp. 127–131. New York: ACM Press.
16. Williams, L., and Upchurch, R. L., In support of student pair-programming. Proceedings of the 32nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Edited by: Walker, H., McCauley, R., Gersting, J., and Russell, I., pp. 327–331. New York: ACM Press.