Teaching for the test: How and why test preparation is appropriate

Defending Standardized Testing

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 159-174

  Crocker, Linda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71649083635     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612595     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Allalouf, A., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1998). The effect of coaching on the predictive validity of scholastic aptitude test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35,31-47.
2. American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington DC: Author.
3. Angel, J. L. (1968). National, state, and other external testing programs. Review of Educational Research, 38,85-91.
4. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1983). Effects of coaching programs on achievement test performance. Review of Educational Research, 53,571-586.
5. Brown, D. (1982, February). Increasing test-wiseness in children. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 180-185.
6. Callenbach, C. (1973). The effects of instruction and practice in content-independent test-taking techniques upon the standardized reading test scores of selected second grade students. Journal of Educational Measurement, 10,25-30.
7. Campanile, P. (1981, March). Evening up the score. Instructor, 58-59.
8. Cannell, J. J. (1987). Nationally normed elementary achievement testing in America's schools: How all fifty states are above the national average. Daniels, WV: Friends for Education.
9. Cizek, G. J. (2002). More unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice, 20(4), 19-27.
10. Crocker, L. (2003). Teaching for the test: Validity, fairness, and moral action. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3,5-10.
11. Crocker, L., & Hombo, C. (1997). Teaching test-taking skills. The Education Advisor, 2(8), 1-5.
12. Doherty, K. M., & Skinner, R. A. (2003, January 9). State of the states. Education Week, 22(17), 75-103.
13. Herman, J. L., & Golan, S. (1993). The effects of standardized testing on teachers and schools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(4), 20-25,41.
14. Hillocks, G., Jr. (2002). The testing trap. NY: Teachers College, Columbia University. Jennings, J. F. (1998). Why national standards and tests? Thousand Oaks: Sage.
15. Kohn, A. (2000, September 27). Standardized testing and its victims: Inconvenient facts and inevitable consequences. Education Week, 60,46.
16. Koretz, D., McCaffrey, D., & Hamilton, L. (2001). Toward a framework for validating gains under high-stakes conditions. CSE Technical Report 551. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing.
17. Lattimore, R. (2001). The wrath of high stakes tests. Urban Review, 33(1), 57-67.
18. Lemann, N. (1999). The big test. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
19. Linn, R. L. (1990). Admissions testing: Recommended uses, validity, differential prediction, and coaching. Applied Measurement in Education, 3, 297-318.
20. Linn, R. L., Graue, M. E., & Sanders, N. M. (1990). Comparing state and district test results to national norms: The validity of the claims that "everyone is above average." Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(3), 5-14.
21. Madaus, G. (1998). The distortion of teaching and testing: High-stakes testing and instruction. Peabody Journal of Education, 65,29-46.
22. McPhail, I. P. (1981, October). Why teach test-wiseness? Journal of Reading, 32-37.
23. Mehrens, W. A. (1998). Consequences of assessment: What is the evidence? Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 6(13), 1-16.
24. Mehrens, W. A., & Kaminski, J. (1989). Methods for improving standardized test scores: Fruitful, fruitless, or fraudulent? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8(1), 14-22.
25. Mehrens, W. A., Popham, W. J., & Ryan, J. M. (1998). How to prepare students for performance assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice, 17(1), 18-22.
26. Millman, J., Bishop, C. H., & Ebel, R. L. (1965). An analysis of test wiseness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25, 707-726.
27. Millman, J., & Pauk, W. (1969). How to take tests. New York: McGraw Hill.
28. Nolan, S. B., Haladyna, T. M., & Haas, N. S. (1992). Uses and abuses of achievement test scores. Education Measurement: Issues & Practice, 11, 9-15.
29. Popham, W. J. (1991). Appropriateness of teachers' test-preparation practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10,12-15.
30. Popham, W. J. (1992). A tale of two test-specification strategies. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice, 11(2), 16-17,22.
31. Popham, W. J. (2003). Seeking redemption for our psychometric sins. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(1) 45-48.
32. Powers, D. E., & Rock, D. A. (1999). Effects of coaching on SAT I: Reasoning test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 93-118.
33. Reeves, D. B. (2001). Standards make a difference: The influence of standards on classroom assessment. NASSP Bulletin, 85,5-12.
34. Sacks, P. (1999). Standardized minds. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
35. Sarnacki, R. E. (1979). An examination of test wiseness in the cognitive domain. Review of Educational Research, 49,252-279.
36. Schmeiser, C. B. (2001). Promoting a healthy environment for college admissions testing. NASSP Bulletin, 85, 27-36.
37. Scruggs, T. E., White, K. P., & Bonnur, K. (1986). Teaching test-taking skills to elementary grade students: A meta-analysis, The Elementary School Journal, 87, 69-82.
38. Shepard, L. A. (1990). Inflated test score gains: Is the problem old norms or teaching to the test? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(3), 15-22.
39. Shortfalls in 1980s reform: Refocused educational strategies on the results of schooling. (1994, July). R & D Preview, p. 6.
40. Smith, M. L., & Rottenberg, C. (1991). Unintended consequences of external testing in elementary schools. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practices, 10(4), 7-11.
41. Smith, J. K., Smith, L. R, & DeLisi, R. (2001). Natural classroom assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
42. Stecher, B. M. (2002). Consequences of large-scale, high-stakes testing on school and classroom practice. In L. S. Hamilton, B. M. Stecher, & S. P. Klein, (Eds.), Making sense of test-based accountability in education. Santa Monica: Rand.
43. Tinkleman, S. N. (1966). Regents Examination in New York State after WOyears. Albany: University of the State of New York, State Department of Education.
44. Wilson, L. W. (2002). Better instruction through assessment. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.