Public-Private Partnerships are no silver bullet: An expanded governance model for Critical Infrastructure Protection

International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 179-187

  Dunn Cavelty, Myriam ^a   Suter, Manuel ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Critical infrastructure protection; Governance theory; Meta governance; Public Private Partnerships

Indexed keywords

BROADER APPROACH; CORPORATE SECTOR; CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION; PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS; PUBLIC-PRIVATE; SELF-ORGANIZING NETWORK;

INTERNET PROTOCOLS; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS; SILVER;

PUBLIC WORKS;

EID: 71649109032     PISSN: 18745482     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2009.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Brunner E., and Suter M. The International CIIP Handbook 2008/2009-An Inventory of Protection Policies in 25 Countries and 6 International Organizations (2008), Center for Security Studies, Zurich
2. In: Dunn Cavelty M., and Kristensen K.S. (Eds). Securing the Homeland: Critical Infrastructure, Risk, and (In)Security (2008), Routledge, London
3. Anderson R., and Moore T. The economics of information security. Science 314 (2006) 610-623
4. Auerswald P.E., Branscomb L.M., La Porte T.M., and Michel-Kerjan E.O. Who will act-Integrating public and private interests to make a safer world. In: Idem (Ed). Seeds of Disaster Roots of Response: How Private Action Can Reduce Public Vulnerability (2006), Cambridge University Press, New York 483-505
5. Andersson J.J., and Malm A. Public-Private Partnerships and the challenge of critical infrastructure protection. In: Dunn M., and Mauer V. (Eds). International CIIP Handbook 2006, Vol. II: Analyzing Issues, Challenges, and Prospects (2006), Center for Security Studies, Zurich 139-168
6. D. Assaf, Conceptualizing the use of Public-Private Partnerships as a regulatory arrangement in critical information infrastructure protection, in: A.O. Peters, L. Koechlin, T. Förster, G.F. Zinkernagel (Eds.), Non-State Actors as Standard Setters, October 2009 (in press)
7. Assaf D. Models of critical information infrastructure protection. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection 1 (2008) 6-14
8. Aviram A. Network responses to network threats: The evolution into private cyber-security associations. In: Grady M.F., and Parisi F. (Eds). The Law and Economics of Cybersecurity (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 143-192
9. Savas E.S. Privatizing the Public Sector-How to Shrink Government (1982), Chatham House Publishers, Chatham
10. Budäus D., and Grüning G. Public Private Partnership-Konzeption und probleme eines instruments zur verwaltungsreform aus sicht der public choice theorie. In: Budäus D., and Eichhorn P. (Eds). Public Private Partnership-Neue Formen öffentlicher Aufgabenerfüllung (1997), Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden 25-65
11. In: Vaillancourt Rosenau P. (Ed). Public-Private Policy Partnerships (2000), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
12. Linder S. Coming to terms with the Public-Private partnership-A grammar of multiple meanings. In: Vaillancourt Rosenau P. (Ed). Public-Private Policy Partnerships (2000), The MIT Press, Cambridge MA 19-36
13. Linder S., and Vaillancourt Rosenau P. Mapping the terrain of the Public-Private policy partnership. In: Vaillancourt Rosenau P. (Ed). Public-Private Policy Partnerships (2000), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1-19
14. Kouwenhoven V. Public-Private Partnership: A model for the management of Public-Private cooperation. In: Kooiman J. (Ed). Modern Governance. New Government-Society Interactions (1993), Sage, London 119-130
15. PCCIP President's Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection, critical foundations, Protecting America's Infrastructures, Washington, DC, 13 October 1997
16. Lopez B. Critical infrastructure protection in the United States since 1993. In: Auerswald P.E., Branscomb L.M., La Porte T.M., and Michel-Kerjan E.O. (Eds). Seeds of Disaster, Roots of Response: How Private Action Can Reduce Public Vulnerability (2006), Cambridge University Press, New York 37-50
17. W.J. Clinton, Protecting America's Critical Infrastructures: Presidential Decision Directive 63, Washington, DC, 22 May 1998
18. W.J. Clinton, Protection Against unconventional threats to the Homeland and Americans overseas: Presidential Decision Directive 62, Washington, DC, 22 May 1998
19. National Security Council, White Paper, The Clinton Administration's policy on critical infrastructure protection: Presidential Decision Directive 63, Washington, DC, May 1998
20. US general accounting office, critical infrastructure protection: Establishing effective information sharing with infrastructure sectors, General Accounting Office, Washington, DC, 2004
21. Prieto D.B. Information sharing with the private sector: History, challenges, innovation, and prospects. In: Auerswald P.E., Branscomb L.M., La Porte T.M., and Michel-Kerjan E.O. (Eds). Seeds of Disaster, Roots of Response: How Private Action Can Reduce Public Vulnerability (2006), Cambridge University Press, New York 404-428
22. Percy S. Mercenaries: Strong norm, weak law. International Organization 61 (2007) 367-397
23. Campbell K., Gordon L.A., Loeb M.P., and Zhou L. The economic cost of publicly announced information security breaches: Empirical evidence from the stock market. Journal of Computer Security 11 (2003) 431-448
24. Cavusoglu H., Mishra B., and Raghunathan S. The effect of internet security breach announcements on market value: Capital market reactions for breached firms and internet security developers. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 9 (2004) 69-104
25. Abele-Wigert I. Challenges governments face in the field of critical information infrastructure protection: Shareholders and perspectives. In: Dunn M., and Mauer V. (Eds). International CIIP Handbook 2006, Vol. II: Analyzing Issues, Challenges, and Prospects (2006), Center for Security Studies, Zurich 69-88
26. J.D. Moteff, G.M. Stevens, Critical Infrastructure Information Disclosure and Homeland Security, Congressional Research Report for Congress, RL31547, 29 January 2003, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC
27. E. Frye, Information-sharing hangups: Is antitrust just a cover? The CIP Report 1, 2003, pp. 6-7
28. Aviram A., and Tor A. Overcoming impediments to information sharing. Alabama Law Review 55 (2004) 231-279
29. Donahue J.D., and Zeckhauser R.J. Public-Private collaboration for infrastructure security. In: Auerswald P.E., Branscomb L.M., La Porte T.M., and Michel-Kerjan E.O. (Eds). Seeds of Disaster, Roots of Response: How Private Action Can Reduce Public Vulnerability (2006), Cambridge University Press, New York 429-456
30. Jessop B. The changing governance of welfare: Recent trends in primary functions, scale and modes of coordination. Social Policy and Administration 33 (1999) 348-359
31. Krahmann E. Conceptualizing security governance. Cooperation and Conflict 38 (2003) 6-26
32. Czempiel E.-O., and Rosenau J.N. Governance Without Governement: Order and Change in World Politics (1992), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
33. Rhodes R.A.W. The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies 44 (1996) 652-667
34. M. Bevir, R.A.W. Rhodes, A decentered theory of governance: Rational choice, institutionalism, and interpretation, Working Papers of the Institute of Governmental Studies, Number 10, Berkeley, 2001
35. Osborne D., Gaebler T., and Reinventing T. Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector (1992), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
36. Kooiman J. Findings, speculations and recommendations. In: Kooiman J. (Ed). Modern Governance. New Government-Society Interactions (1993), Sage, London 249-262
37. Stoker G. Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal 50 (1998) 17-28
38. Stoker G. Theory and urban politics. International Political Science Review 19 (1998) 119-129
39. Peters G., and Pierre J. Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (1998) 223-243
40. Salamon L.M. The tools approach and the new governance: Conclusion and implications. In: Salamon L.M. (Ed). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford 600-610
41. Jessop B. The rise of governance and the risk of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal 50 (1998) 29-46
42. Sorensen E., and Metagovernance E. The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. The American Review of Public Administration 36 (2006) 98-114
43. Scharpf F. Die Handlungsfähigkeit des Staates am Ende des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 32 (1991) 621-634
44. Mayntz R., and Scharpf F. Steuerung und Selbstorganisation in staatsnahen Sektoren. In: Mayntz R., and Scharpf F. (Eds). Gesellschaftliche Selbstregulierung und politische Steuerung (1995), Campus, Frankfurt, New York 9-38
45. Salamon L.M. The new governance and the tools of public action: An introduction. In: Salamon L.M. (Ed). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford 1-47
46. M. Suter, A generic national framework for critical information infrastructure protection, Meeting background paper for the 2nd facilitation meeting for WSIS Action Line C5, International Telecommunication Unit, ITU, Geneva, 2007
47. Posner P.L. Accoutability challenges of third-party government. In: Salamon L.M. (Ed). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford 523-551
48. Peters G. The politics of tool choice. In: Salamon L.M. (Ed). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford 552-564
49. US General Accounting Office, Information Sharing-DHS should take steps to encourage more widespread use of its program to protection and share critical infrastructure information, General Accounting Office, Washington, DC, 2006