Strain-based design criteria of pipelines

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 884-888

  Liu, Bing ^a   Liu, X J ^b   Zhang, Hong ^b  

^a PETROCHINA PIPELINE R AND D CENTER   (China)

^b CHINA UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM   (China)

Author keywords

Design criteria; Limit states; Pipeline; Strain limit; Strain based

Indexed keywords

COMPRESSION STRAIN; DESIGN CRITERION; GROUND DISPLACEMENT; LIMIT STATE; LIMIT STATES; OVALIZATION; PIPELINE DESIGN; STRAIN LIMIT; STRAIN-BASED DESIGN; STRESS CRITERION;

DESIGN; PIPELINE CODES; PIPELINES;

TENSILE STRAIN;

EID: 71649108834     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. AME. (1997). Establishment of Strain-Based Criteria and Analysis for the Assessment of Sub-sea Pipelines. Final Report AME/ 26563/R/04.
2. American Bureau of Shipping (2006). ABS Guide for Building and Classing Subsea Pipeline Systems, Houston: May, 2006.
3. API 1111. Design, construction, operation, and maintenance of offshore hydrocarbon pipelines (1999) Washington, DC, USA
4. API 5L. American petroleum institute publishing services, specification 5L for line pipe (2000) Washington, DC,USA
5. ASCE. Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe (with addenda through February 2005) (2005) USA
6. BS 8010. (1993). Code of practice for pipeline-part 3. Pipeline subsea: Design, construction and installation. British.
7. Chiou Y.-J., and Chi S.Y. Numerical modeling for buckling of buried pipelines induced by compressive ground failure. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers 19 3 (1996) 321-332
8. CSA-Z662-1996. (1996). Canadian standards association oil and gas pipeline systems. exdale, Ontario, Canada.
9. CSA-Z662-03. (2003). Canadian standards association. Oil and gas pipeline systems. exdale, Ontario, Canada.
10. CSA-Z662-2007. (2007). Canadian standards association. Oil and gas pipeline systems. exdale, Ontario, Canada.
11. Das, S., Cheng, J. J., Murray, D. W., & Zhou, Z. J., (2000), Laboratory Study of Local Buckling, Wrinkling Development, and Strain for NPS12 Line Pipe Proceedings: International Pipeline Conference, October.
12. Denys, R., De Waele, W., Lefevre, A., & De Baets, P. (2004). Plastic straining capacity of axially-loaded pipelines: experimental facts and critical considerations, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Pipeline Technology, In Rudi Denys, Ostend, (Eds.), Belgium, pp. 183-207.
13. Dinovitzer A.S., Brian A., and Graville. Strain-based failure criteria for sharp part-wall defects in pipes[C]. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pressure Vessel Technology (1996), ASME
14. Dinovitzer, A. S., & Smith, R. J. (1998). Strain-based pipeline design criteria review. Proceedings of the 2nd International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
15. DNV-OS-F101. (1982). Submarine Pipeline Systems[S]. HØvik Norway.
16. DNV-OS-F101. (1996). Submarine Pipeline Systems[S]. HØvik Norway.
17. DNV-OS-F101. (2000). Submarine Pipeline Systems[S]. HØvik Norway.
18. Dorey, A. B., Murray, D. W., Cheng, J. J. R., Grondin, G. Y., & Zhou, Z. J. (1999), Testing and experimental results for NPS 30 line pipe under combined loads, Proceedings: 18th OMAE Conference, Paper No. OMAE99/PIPE-5022.
19. Ellinas C.P. Pipeline design based on strain criteria. Chemical Business 13 5 (1999) 131-135
20. Fatemi A., Kenny S., Sen M., Zhou J., Taheri F., and Paulin M. Investigations on the local buckling response of high strength linepipe. Proceedings of the 7th International Pipeline Conference (2008), ASME, Calgary, Canada
21. Graville, B. A., & Dinovitzer, A. S. (1993). Development of rational criteria for strain limits in pipeline welds. Report to Nova Corporation.
22. Liu, B., Liu, X. J., & Zhang, H. (2008a). Compressive strain capacity of pipelines for strain-based design. 7th International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
23. Liu B., Liu, X. J., & Zhang, H. (2008b). Tensile strain capacity of pipelines for strain-based design. 7th International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
24. Murray, N. A., & Bilston, P. (1992). Rational acceptance limit for field bends in oil or gas pipelines. International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Canada.
25. Pan J.-h. Several concernment task under development of high strength pipeline steel. Welded Pipe and Tube 28 4 (2005) 1-2
26. Wang Y.-Y., Liu M., Chen Y., and Horsley D. Effects of geometry, temperature, and test procedure on reported failure strains from simulated wide plate tests. Proceedings of the 6th International Pipeline Conference (2006), ASME, Calgary, Canada
27. Wang Y.-Y., Denys R., Rudland D., and Horseley D. A preliminary strain-based design criterion for pipeline girth welds. Proceedings of the 4th International Pipeline Conference (2002), ASME, Calgary, Canada
28. Wang Y.-Y., Cheng W., and Horsley D. Tensile strain limits of buried defects in pipeline girth welds. Proceedings of the 5th International Pipeline Conference (2004), ASME, Calgary, Canada
29. Zhou, Joe, & Glover, Alan (2005). Strain-based design of pipelines - the path. Rio Pipeline 2005 Conference & Exhibition.