Tensile strain capacity of pipelines for strain-based design

Proceedings of the Biennial International Pipeline Conference, IPC

Volumn 3, Issue , 2009, Pages 533-541

  Liu, Bing ^a,b   Liu, X J ^a   Zhang, Hong ^a  

^a CHINA UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM   (China)

^b PetroChina Pipeline R and D Center Langfang   (China)

Author keywords

Girth Weld; Pipeline; Strain Based Design; Tensile Strain Limit

Indexed keywords

AXIAL DIRECTION; AXIAL STRAIN; AXIAL TENSILE STRAIN; CODES AND STANDARDS; COMPRESSION STRAIN; CURVED WIDE PLATE TESTS; DEFECT SIZE; EXPERIMENT DATA; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; FULL SCALE TESTS; GIRTH WELD; GROUND DISPLACEMENT; INTERNAL PRESSURE; PARAMETRIC EQUATION; PIPELINE DESIGN; PLASTIC COLLAPSE; PLASTIC STRAIN; QUANTITATIVE APPROACH; QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATIONS; STRAIN-BASED DESIGN; STRESS CRITERION; TENSION STRAIN; TEST DATA; Y/T-RATIO;

DESIGN; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FRACTURE; LOCATION; PIPE; PIPELINE CODES; PIPELINES; PLASTIC PIPE; PRESSURE EFFECTS; SAFETY FACTOR; SURFACE DEFECTS; THERMOANALYSIS; WELDING; WELDS;

TENSILE STRAIN;

EID: 70350041362     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/IPC2008-64031     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Det Norske Veritas(DNV). Submarine Pipeline Systems[S]. Høvik Norway, 2000.
2. Canadian Standards Association. Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems. exdale,Ontario,Canada, 2003.
3. AME. Establishment of Strain-Based Criteria and Analysis for the Assessment of Sub-sea Pipelines. Final Report AME/26563/R/04, 1997.
4. Det Norske Veritas(DNV). Rules for Submarine Pipeline Systems. Høvik,Norway, 1982.
5. Det Norske Veritas(DNV). Rules for Submarine Pipeline Systems(1996). Høvik,Norway,1996.
6. Canadian Standards Association. Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems. Rexdale,Ontario,Canada, 1996.
7. EWI. Strain-Based Design of Pipelines. Report Project No. 45892GTH, October 8, 2003.
8. Yong-Yi, Wang, Rudland, David Denys. et al. A preliminary strain-based design criterion for pipeline girth welds. Proceedings of the 4th International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Canada,ASME, 2002.
9. Yong-Yi, Wang, Wentao, Cheng, et al. Tensile strain limits of buried defects in pipeline girth welds. Proceedings of the 5th International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Canada, ASME, 2004.
10. Aaron S., Dinovitzer, Graville, Brian A., et al. Strain-based failure criteria for sharp part-wall defects in pipes. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pressure Vessel Technology, ASME, 1996.
11. Graville, Brian A., Aaron S., Dinovitzer et al. Development of rational criteria for strain limits in pipeline welds. Report to Nova Corporation, 1993.
12. Bing Liu, X.J., Liu, Hong Zhang. Strain-based Design Criteria of Pipelines. World Conference on Safety of Oil and Gas Industry 2007, April 10-13,2007, Gyeongju, Korea.
13. American Petroleum Institute Publishing Services. API 5L, Specification 5L for Line Pipe. Washington, D.C,USA, 2000.
14. Denys, R. M. Wide Plate Testing ofWeldments, Part I, II, and III, Fatigue and Fracture Testing of Weldments. ASTM STP 1058, Eds. H. McHe.
15. Yong-Yi, Wang, Ming Liu, Yaoshan Chen, et al. Effects of Geometry, Temperature, and Test Procedure on Reported Failure Strains from Simulated Wide Plate Tests. Proceedings of the 6th International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Canada, ASME, 2006.
16. Yong-Yi, Wang, Wentao, Cheng, Martin McLamb, et al. Tensile Strain Limits of Girth Welds with Surface-Breaking Defects Part II Experimental Correlation and Validation, in Pipeline Technology, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Pipeline Technology, Edited by Rudi Denys, Ostend, Belgium, May 9-13, 2004.