Information on the 3rs in animal research publications is crucial

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 9, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 60-61

  Whittall, Hugh ^a  

^a UK Human Genetics Commission   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL WELFARE; ARTICLE; ETHICAL THEORY; ETHICS; HUMAN; MORALITY; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; EDITORIAL POLICIES; ETHICAL THEORY; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GREAT BRITAIN; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 71649095867     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160903323095     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Osborne, N. J., Payne,D., and Newman, M. L. 2009. Journal editorial policies, animal welfare, and the 3Rs. American Journal of Bioethics 9(12): 55-59.
2. National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs). Available at: http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/ (accessed October 7, 2009).
3. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2005. The Ethics of Research Involving Animals. London, UK: Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Available at: http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/ (accessed October 7, 2009).